Plea Agreement — U.S. v. Halfkenny

Record facts

U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · No. 1:26-cr-10107-NMG · Doc. 3 · 2026-04-10 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3 _ Filed 04/10/26 Page1of8

U.S. Department of Justice

Leah B. Foley
United States Attorney
District of Massachusetts

Main Reception: (617) 748-3100 John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse
1 Courthouse Way
Suite 9200
Boston, Massachusetts 02210

April 10, 2026

Patrick M. Hanley, Esq.
Butters Brazilian LLP
420 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02116

Re: United States v. Damian Halfkenny

Criminal No. 2 ¢ . lolote- N Moe
Dear Mr, Hanley:

The United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts (the “U.S. Attorney”) and your
client, Damian Halfkenny (“Defendant”), agree as follows, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 11(c)(1)(B):

1, Change of Plea

As soon as possible, Defendant will waive Indictment and plead guilty to Count One of the
Information: Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Defendant admits that Defendant
committed the crime specified in this count and is in fact guilty of it.

es Penalties
Defendant faces the following maximum penalties: incarceration for twenty years;
supervised release for three years; a fine of $250,000; a mandatory special assessment of $100;

restitution; and forfeiture to the extent charged in the Information.

3. Sentencing Guidelines

The parties agree, based on the following calculations, that Defendant’s total “offense
level” under the Guidelines is 7:

Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3 _ Filed 04/10/26 Page 2of8

a) Defendant’s base offense level is 7, because wire fraud is punishable by twenty
years or more (USSG § 2B1.1(a)(1));

b) Defendant’s offense level is increased by 4, because the loss was between
$15,000 and $40,000 (USSG § 2B1.1(b)(1)(C));

c) Defendant’s offense level is decreased by 2, because Defendant has accepted
responsibility for Defendant’s crime (USSG § 3E1.1(a)); and

d) Defendant’s offense is decreased by 2, because Defendant qualifies as a zero-
point offender (USSG § 4C1.1(a)).

Defendant understands that the Court is not required to follow this calculation or even to
sentence Defendant within the Guidelines and that Defendant may not withdraw Defendant’s
guilty plea if Defendant disagrees with how the Court calculates the Guidelines or with the
sentence the Court imposes.

Defendant also understands that the government will object to any reduction in Defendant’s
sentence based on acceptance of responsibility if: (a) at sentencing, Defendant (directly or through
counsel) indicates that Defendant does not fully accept responsibility for having engaged in the
conduct underlying each of the elements of the crime to which Defendant is pleading guilty; or (b)
by the time of sentencing, Defendant has committed a new federal or state offense, or has in any
way obstructed justice.

If, after signing this Agreement, Defendant’s criminal history score or Criminal History
Category is reduced, the U.S. Attorney reserves the right to seek an upward departure under the
Guidelines.

Nothing in this Plea Agreement affects the U.S. Attorney’s obligation to provide the Court
and the U.S. Probation Office with accurate and complete information regarding this case.

4, Sentence Recommendation

The U.S. Attorney agrees to recommend the following sentence to the Court:
a) One year of probation;

b) amandatory special assessment of $100, which Defendant must pay to the Clerk
of the Court by the date of sentencing;

c) restitution of $21,332.79; and

d) forfeiture as set forth in Paragraph 6.

p
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3 _ Filed 04/10/26 Page 3of8

Defendant agrees that all criminal monetary penalties, including special assessment,
restitution, forfeiture, and/or fine imposed shall be due and payable immediately, and further
agrees that any Court-ordered repayment schedule does not preclude further enforcement or
collection by the United States.

5, Waiver of Appellate Rights and Challenges to Conviction or Sentence

Defendant has the right to challenge Defendant’s conviction and sentence on “direct
appeal.” This means that Defendant has the right to ask a higher court (the “appeals court”) to look
at what happened in this case and, if the appeals court finds that the trial court or the parties made
certain mistakes, overturn Defendant’s conviction or sentence. Also, in some instances, Defendant
has the right to file a separate civil lawsuit claiming that serious mistakes were made in this case
and that Defendant’s conviction or sentence should be overturned.

Defendant understands that Defendant has these rights, but now agrees to give them up.
Specifically, Defendant agrees that:

a) Defendant will not challenge Defendant’s conviction on direct appeal or in any
other proceeding, including in a separate civil lawsuit; and

b) Defendant will not challenge Defendant’s sentence, including any court orders
related to forfeiture, restitution, fines or supervised release, on direct appeal or
in any other proceeding, including in a separate civil lawsuit.

Defendant understands that, by agreeing to the above, Defendant is agreeing that
Defendant’s conviction and sentence will be final when the Court issues a written judgment after
the sentencing hearing in this case. That is, after the Court issues a written judgment, Defendant
will lose the right to appeal or otherwise challenge Defendant’s conviction and sentence, regardless
of whether Defendant later changes Defendant’s mind or finds new information that would have
led Defendant not to agree to give up these rights in the first place.

Defendant is agreeing to give up these rights at least partly in exchange for concessions the
U.S. Attorney is making in this Agreement.

The parties agree that, despite giving up these rights, Defendant keeps the right to later
claim that Defendant’s lawyer rendered ineffective assistance of counsel, or that the prosecutor or
a member of law enforcement involved in the case engaged in misconduct serious enough to entitle
Defendant to have Defendant’s conviction or sentence overturned.

6. Forfeiture

Defendant understands that the Court will, upon acceptance of Defendant’s guilty plea,
enter an order of forfeiture as part of Defendant’s sentence, and that the order of forfeiture may
include assets directly traceable to Defendant’s offense, assets used to facilitate Defendant’s
offense, substitute assets, and/or a money judgment equal to the value of the property derived from,

3
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3 _ Filed 04/10/26 Page4of8

or otherwise involved in, the offense.
The assets to be forfeited specifically include, without limitation, the following:

a. $21,332.79 in United States currency, to be entered in the form of an Order of
Forfeiture (Money Judgment).

Defendant admits that $21,332.79 is subject to forfeiture on the grounds that it is equal to
the amount of proceeds the defendant derived from the offense.

Defendant acknowledges and agrees that the amount of the forfeiture money judgment
represents proceeds the Defendant obtained (directly or indirectly), and/or facilitating property
and/or property involved in, the crime to which Defendant is pleading guilty and that, due at least
in part to the acts or omissions of Defendant, the proceeds or property have been transferred to, or
deposited with, a third party, spent, cannot be located upon exercise of due diligence, placed
beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, substantially diminished in value, or commingled with other
property which cannot be divided without difficulty. Accordingly, Defendant agrees that the
United States is entitled to forfeit as “substitute assets” any other assets of Defendant up to the
value of the now missing directly forfeitable assets.

Defendant agrees to consent to the entry of an order of forfeiture for such property and
waives the requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(J), 32.2, and 43(a)
regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, advice regarding the forfeiture at the
change-of-plea hearing, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the
forfeiture in the judgment. Defendant understands and agrees that forfeiture shall not satisfy or
affect any fine, lien, penalty, restitution, cost of imprisonment, tax liability or any other debt owed
to the United States.

If the U.S. Attorney requests, Defendant shall deliver to the U.S. Attorney within 30 days
after signing this Plea Agreement a sworn financial statement disclosing all assets in which
Defendant currently has any interest and all assets over which Defendant has exercised control, or
has had any legal or beneficial interest. Defendant further agrees to be deposed with respect to
Defendant’s assets at the request of the U.S. Attorney. Defendant agrees that the United States
Department of Probation may share any financial information about the Defendant with the United
States Attorney’s Office.

Defendant also agrees to waive all constitutional, legal, and equitable challenges (including
direct appeal, habeas corpus, or any other means) to any forfeiture carried out in accordance with
this Plea Agreement.

Defendant hereby waives and releases any claims Defendant may have to any vehicles,
currency, or other personal property seized by the United States, or seized by any state or local law
enforcement agency and turned over to the United States, during the investigation and prosecution
of this case, and consents to the forfeiture of all such assets.

4
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3 _ Filed 04/10/26 Page5of8

7. Civil Liability
This Plea Agreement does not affect any civil liability, including any tax liability,
Defendant has incurred or may later incur due to Defendant’s criminal conduct and guilty plea to

the charges specified in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement.

8. Breach of Plea Agreement

Defendant understands that if Defendant breaches any provision of this Agreement,
violates any condition of Defendant’s pre-trial release or commits any crime following
Defendant’s execution of this Plea Agreement, Defendant cannot rely upon such conduct to
withdraw Defendant’s guilty plea. Defendant’s conduct, however, would give the U.S. Attorney
the right to be released from the U.S. Attorney’s commitments under this Agreement, to pursue
any charges that were, or are to be, dismissed under this Agreement, and to use against Defendant
any of Defendant’s statements, and any information or materials Defendant provided to the
government during investigation or prosecution of Defendant’s case—even if the parties had
entered any earlier written or oral agreements or understandings about this issue.

Defendant also understands that if Defendant breaches any provision of this Agreement or
engages in any of the aforementioned conduct, Defendant thereby waives any defenses based on
the statute of limitations, constitutional protections against pre-indictment delay, and the Speedy
Trial Act, that Defendant otherwise may have had to any charges based on conduct occurring
before the date of this Agreement.

9. Who is Bound by Plea Agreement

This Agreement is only between Defendant and the U.S. Attorney for the District of
Massachusetts. It does not bind the Attorney General of the United States or any other federal,
state, or local prosecuting authorities.

10. Modifications to Plea Agreement

This Agreement can be modified or supplemented only in a written memorandum signed
by both parties, or through proceedings in open court.
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3 _ Filed 04/10/26 Page 6of8

If this letter accurately reflects the agreement between the U.S. Attorney and Defendant,
please have Defendant sign the Acknowledgment of Plea Agreement below. Please also sign below
as Witness. Return the original of this letter to Assistant U.S. Attorney Christine Wichers.

Sincerely,

LEAH B. FOLEY
United States Attorney

By: thy /

DUSTINCHAO “7
Chief, Public Corruption Unit

Caw WA

CHRISTINE WICHERS
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3 _ Filed 04/10/26 Page /7of8

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PLEA AGREEMENT

I have read this letter and discussed it with my attorney. The letter accurately presents my
agreement with the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts. There are no
unwritten agreements between me and the United States Attorney’s Office, and no United States
government official has made any unwritten promises or representations to me in connection with
my guilty plea. I have received no prior offers to resolve this case.

I understand the crime I am pleading guilty to, and the maximum penalties for that crime.
have discussed the Sentencing Guidelines with my lawyer, and I understand the sentencing ranges
that may apply.

I am satisfied with the legal representation my lawyer has given me, and we have had
enough time to meet and discuss my case. We have discussed the charge against me, possible
defenses I might have, the terms of this Agreement and whether I should go to trial.

I am entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily and because I am in fact guilty of
the offense. I believe this Agreement is in my best interest.

Aax||up rs
Damian Hatfk in) (Apr 10, 2026 15:19:31 EDT)

Damian Halfkenny
Defendant
Date: 04/10/2026

I certify that Damian Halfkenny has read this Agreement and that we have discussed what
it means. I believe Mr. Halfkenny understands the Agreement and is entering into it freely,
voluntarily, and knowingly. I also certify that the U.S. Attorney has not extended any other offers

regarding a change of plea in this case.

Patrick M. Hanley
Attorney for Defendant

Date: April 10, 2026

Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document3_ Filed 04/10/26 Page 8of8

Halfkenny plea agreement (4-10-26) (USAO
executed).docx

Final Audit Report 2026-04-10
Created: 2026-04-10
By: Patrick Hanley (patrickmhanley@patrickhanleylaw.com)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAXRD5eTxwrO7_st9klf6J1 JiGn8nS1ccn

"Halfkenny plea agreement (4-10-26) (USAO executed).docx" Hi
story

*) Document created by Patrick Hanley (patrickmhanley@patrickhanleylaw.com)
2026-04-10 - 6:22:23 PM GMT- IP address: 96.78.196.153

Ex. Document emailed to Damian Halfkenny (dhalfkenny1@aol.com) for signature
2026-04-10 - 6:22:32 PM GMT

-®@ Email sent to Patrick Hanley (patrickmhanley@patrickhanleylaw.com) bounced and could not be delivered
2026-04-10 - 6:22:35 PM GMT

*) Email viewed by Damian Halfkenny (dhalfkenny1@aol.com)
2026-04-10 - 7:18:41 PM GMT- IP address: 146.75.252.0

@ Document e-signed by Damian Halfkenny (dhalfkenny1@aol.com)
Signature Date: 2026-04-10 - 7:19:31 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 174.242.74.149

@ Agreement completed.
2026-04-10 - 7:19:31 PM GMT

Adobe Acrobat Sign

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mad.298905.3.0.pdf

Size

3,363,672 bytes

SHA-256

cc27ae84d678446839eaa07dfd674e5d9d5bd60f5acd0d79e61ede3ac2395659

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mad.298905.3.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)