Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings U.S. v. Gregory Keough Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Supervised Release — United States v. Gregor…

Court filing

Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Supervised Release — United States v. Gregory Scott Keough

No. 9:23-cr-80154-DMM · Doc. 70 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 1 of 8




  Patrick J. Egan (Pro Hac Vice pending)
  Ian Comisky
  FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
  Two Commerce Square
  2001 Market Street, Suite 1700
  Philadelphia, PA 10103
  pegan@foxrothschild.com
  icomisky@foxrothschild.com
  Tel: 215.299.2000
  Fax: 215.299.2150
  Attorneys for Defendant
  Gregory Scott Keough

                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                                  CASE NO. 9:23-CR-80154-DMM-1

  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                     Plaintiff,

         v.

  GREGORY SCOTT KEOUGH,

                 Defendant.
  _________________________________

   DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

         Defendant Gregory Scott Keough (“Mr. Keough”), by and through undersigned counsel,

  respectfully submits this Motion to Modify Conditions of Supervised Release (“Motion”). Keough

  seeks to modify his supervised release conditions to (a) become non-reporting and (b) remove the

  drug testing requirement, and in support thereof states as follows:

         1.      Mr. Keough incorporates by reference the Statement of Material Facts and

  Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Modify Conditions of Supervised Release filed

  contemporaneously with this Motion.
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 2 of 8




             2.   Courts are empowered to “modify, reduce, or enlarge the conditions of supervised

  release, at any time prior to the expiration or termination of the term of supervised release….” 18

  U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2).

             3.   Courts must make an individualized assessment of the defendant’s circumstances

  when modifying conditions of supervised release. See United States v. Bell, 915 F.3d 574, 577-78

  (8th Cir. 2019).

             4.   Courts are guided by factors noted in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) when evaluating

  modifications to supervised release conditions.

             5.   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), Mr. Keough moves the Court to modify the

  conditions of his supervised release to cease all reporting to the United States Probation Office.

             6.   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), Mr. Keough moves the Court to modify the

  conditions of his supervised release to remove the requirement that he submit to periodic drug

  testing.

             7.   The United States Probation Office has stated regarding the relief sought that they

  “typically do not recommend non-reporting supervision as it becomes impossible to enforce any

  of the standard and special conditions imposed by the court, however, it may be appropriate in this

  case.” See Declaration of Patrick J. Egan, Esq. (“Egan Declaration”) ¶ 3.

             8.   The United States Attorney’s Office objects to the relief sought in this Motion. See

  Egan Decl. ¶ 4.




                                                    2
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 3 of 8




  Dated: July 1, 2025                      FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP



                                           /s/ Patrick J. Egan
                                           Patrick J. Egan (Pro Hac Vice pending)
                                           Ian Comisky
                                           Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street
                                           Suite 1700
                                           Philadelphia, PA 19103
                                           Tel: 215.299.2000
                                           Fax: 215.299.2150
                                           pegan@foxrothschild.com
                                           icomisky@foxrothschild.com
                                           Attorneys for Defendant
                                           Gregory Scott Keough




                                       3
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 4 of 8




  Patrick J. Egan (Pro Hac Vice pending)
  Ian Comisky
  FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
  Two Commerce Square
  2001 Market Street, Suite 1700
  Philadelphia, PA 10103
  pegan@foxrothschild.com
  icomisky@foxrothschild.com
  Tel: 215.299.2000
  Fax: 215.299.2150
  Attorneys for Defendant
  Gregory Scott Keough

                         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                                 CASE NO. 9:23-CR-80154-DMM-1

  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff,

         v.

  GREGORY SCOTT KEOUGH,

                 Defendant.
  _________________________________

                             STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS

         Pursuant to Local Rule 88.9, Defendant Gregory Scott Keough (“Mr. Keough”), by and

  through undersigned counsel, respectfully submits this Statement of Material Facts in support of

  his Motion to Modify Conditions of Supervised Release:

         1.     Mr. Keough pled guilty in November 2023 to two counts of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C.

  § 1343, and one count of money laundering, 18 U.S.C. 1957(a). See Judgment 1, ECF No. 60.

         2.     The Court sentenced him to thirty months imprisonment, followed by a three-year

  term of supervised release. See Judgment 2-3, ECF No. 60.
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 5 of 8




         3.      Mr. Keough voluntarily reported to prison on March 25, 2024. He was released to

  a halfway house on May 21, 2025, and currently is under home confinement at a rental property

  in Wellington, Florida. Declaration of Gregory Scott Keough (“Keough Declaration”) ¶¶ 3, 5.

         4.      As part of his sentence, the Court imposed several “mandatory” conditions of

  supervised release, among them the requirement that Mr. Keough to “submit to one drug test within

  15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, as determined

  by the court.” Judgment 3, ECF No. 60.

         5.      Mr. Keough has never abused alcohol, nor experimented with any illicit drugs. See

  Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) 19-20 ¶¶ 86-87, ECF No. 50.

         6.      The Probation Office determined that Mr. Keough “pose[d] a low risk of future

  substance abuse.” PSR 27 ¶ 125, ECF No. 50.

         7.      Mr. Keough has been subjected to three drug tests since his release from prison.

  Keough Decl. ¶ 3. All drug tests returned negative results for the presence of illicit drugs. Id.

         8.      The Court also imposed thirteen “standard” conditions of supervised release. See

  Judgment 4, ECF No. 60.

         9.      Many of the standard conditions require Mr. Keough to report in some way to an

  officer with the United States Probation Office:

                 2. After initially reporting to the probation office, you will receive instructions from
                 the court or the probation officer about how and when you must report to the
                 probation officer, and you must report to the probation officer as instructed.

                 3. You must not knowingly leave the federal judicial district where you are
                 authorized to reside without first getting permission from the court or the probation
                 officer.

                 …

                 5. You must live at a place approved by the probation officer. If you plan to change
                 where you live or anything about your living arrangements (such as the people you
                                                     2
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 6 of 8




                 live with), you must notify the probation officer at least 10 days before the change.
                 If notifying the probation officer in advance is not possible due to unanticipated
                 circumstances, you must notify the probation officer within 72 hours of becoming
                 aware of a change or expected change.

                 6. You must allow the probation officer to visit you at any time at your home or
                 elsewhere, and you must permit the probation officer to take any items prohibited
                 by the conditions of your supervision that he or she observes in plain view.

  Id.

         10.     Finally, the Court imposed four “special” conditions of supervised release. See

  Judgment 5, ECF No. 60.

         11.     The special conditions: (1) prohibit Mr. Keough from associating with his partner

  in crime, Derek Acree; (2) requires complete financial disclosure to the Probation Office; (3)

  subject Mr. Keough to periodic searches of person or property; and (4) require Mr. Keough pay

  unpaid fines and restitution. See id.

         12.     Mr. Keough’s life is not in the United States; Ana, his wife of 30 years, is a citizen

  and resident of El Salvador. PSR 18 ¶ 77, ECF No. 50.

         13.     The couple have five children, all of whom are also El Salvadoran citizens. Id.

         14.     The family had lived in El Salvador for over two years prior to Mr. Keough’s plea,

  and had intended to settle in San Salvador, El Salvador permanently. See Keough Decl. ¶ 7.

         15.     Individually Mr. Keough has deep and lengthy ties to El Salvador, having originally

  arrived there over thirty years ago while serving in the United States Central Intelligence Agency.

  See PSR 22 ¶ 98, ECF No. 50.

         16.     He has lived in El Salvador intermittently for the last ten years as an authorized

  legal resident. See Keough Decl. ¶ 6. All told, he considers El Salvador his home. Id. ¶ 14.

         17.     Prior to his plea Mr. Keough was working full time in El Salvador and had adequate

  income to support his family. See PSR 20 ¶ 92, 23 ¶ 99, ECF No. 50. Mr. Keough will be able to
                                                   3
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 7 of 8




  return to his former work should he be allowed to return to El Salvador. See PSR 23 ¶ 99, ECF No.

  50; Keough Decl. ¶ 12.

          18.     The Keough family has no home and owns no property in the United States. See

  Keough Decl. ¶ 8.

          19.     Mr. Keough’s one daughter was a college student in the U.S. but is now studying

  in Spain. Id. ¶ 9. His three brothers reside in the United States but are not local to Florida. See PSR

  17 ¶ 75, ECF No. 50.

          20.     Mr. Keough’s family struggles without him in El Salvador. His two youngest

  children are special needs—one has ADD and Dyslexia, and the youngest child has sensory

  processing disorder, ADHD and is currently undergoing psychiatric and phycological treatment.

  See PSR 18 ¶ 77, ECF No. 50.

          21.     In addition, Ana Keough’s elderly father passed away unexpectedly. See Keough

  Decl. ¶ 10. As a result, she and Mr. Keough are now the primary care givers for Ana’s mother, who

  is also a citizen of El Salvador. Id.

          22.     The Keough family is currently getting by, but they need Mr. Keough in El Salvador

  for emotional and financial support. See id. ¶ 11. Mr. Keough also needs his family to ease his

  transition back into civilian life. Id.

          23.      Undersigned counsel contacted Scott T. Kirsche, Supervising United States

  Probation Officer in this matter to seek the position of his office on this Motion. Mr. Kirsche

  advised that the Probation Office “typically do not recommend non-reporting supervision as it

  becomes impossible to enforce any of the standard and special conditions imposed by the court,

  however, it may be appropriate in this case.” See Declaration of Patrick J. Egan, Esq. (“Egan

  Declaration”) ¶ 3.

                                                    4
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2025 Page 8 of 8




         24.     Undersigned counsel has been advised by Assistant United States Attorney, Katie

  Sadlo, that the government objects to the relief requested in this motion. Id. ¶ 4.



  Dated: July 1, 2025                                   FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP



                                                        /s/ Patrick J. Egan
                                                        Patrick J. Egan (Pro Hac Vice pending)
                                                        Ian Comisky
                                                        Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street
                                                        Suite 1700
                                                        Philadelphia, PA 19103
                                                        Tel: 215.299.2000
                                                        Fax: 215.299.2150
                                                        pegan@foxrothschild.com
                                                        icomisky@foxrothschild.com
                                                        Attorneys for Defendant
                                                        Gregory Scott Keough




                                                    5


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.653009.70.0.pdf
Size
203,662 bytes
SHA-256
1cb354197c7c85de695bc934a08c4739dac7941ff55cb2e86fabfb79cb9b117e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.653009.70.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top