Court filing
Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Francois (D. Mass.)
Filed March 11, 2026 in U.S. v. Francois; one of 5 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-03-11 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · No. 1:25-cr-10389-FDS · Doc. 14 · 2026-03-11 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 1:25-cr-10389-FDS Document14 Filed 03/11/26 Page1of3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. 25-10389-FDS Vv. WIGENIE FRANCOIS, ) ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER OF FORFEITURE (MONEY JUDGMENT) SAYLOR, D.J. WHEREAS, on October 1, 2025, the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts filed a one-count Information, charging defendant Wigenie Francois (the “Defendant”), with Wire Fraud; Aiding and Abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 (Count One); WHEREAS, the Information also included a forfeiture allegation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a\(1)\(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), which provided notice that the United States intended to seek the forfeiture, upon conviction of the Defendant of any offense alleged in Count One of the Information, of any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the offense; WHEREAS, such property specifically included, without limitation: a. $20,833 in U.S. currency, to be entered in the form of a forfeiture money judgment; WHEREAS, the Information further provided that, if any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission by the Defendant, (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided Case 1:25-cr-10389-FDS Document14 Filed 03/11/26 Page2of3 without difficulty, the United States is entitled to seek forfeiture of any other property of the Defendant, up to the value of such assets, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incoporated by 28 US.C. § 2461 (c); WHEREAS, on December 11, 2025, at a hearing pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a written plea agreement that she signed on September 26, 2025; WHEREAS, in Paragraph 6 of the plea agreement, the Defendant agreed to forfeit to the United States $20,833 on the grounds that such amount is equal to the amount of proceeds the Defendant derived from the offense as a result of her guilty plea; WHEREAS, based on the Defendant's admissions in the written plea agreement and her guilty plea on December 11, 2025, the United States is entitled to an Order of Forfeiture consisting of a personal money judgment against the Defendant in the amount of $20,833 in United States currency, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c): WHEREAS, the amount of $20,833 constitutes proceeds that the Defendant obtained as a result of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2; and WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that “no ancillary proceeding is required to the extent that the forfeiture consists of a money judgment.” ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 1. The Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $20,833, pursuant to 18 US.C. § 981 (a) )(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). 2. This Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Case 1:25-cr-10389-FDS Document14 _ Filed 03/11/26 Page3of3 Order. 3. The United States may, at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to amend this Order to substitute property having a value not to exceed the amount set forth in Paragraph | to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part. 4. The United States may, at any time, conduct pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. 2461, any discovery to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property or substitute assets, including, but not limited to, depositions and requests for documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things. 5. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4), this Order shall be included in the sentence pronounced and imposed by the Court at the sentencing hearing, and in the criminal judgment entered by this Court against the Defendant. /s/ F. Dennis Saylor, IV F. DENNIS SAYLOR IV United States District Judge Certified to be a true and correet copy of the original Robert M. Farrell, Clerk U. S. District Court District of Massachusetts Deputy Clerk Date: 03/11/2026
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mad.289747.14.0.pdf
- Size
- 611,003 bytes
- SHA-256
- c12277b0d2aac03c7ffd6fc8f575fe661791f5e766d9c0ff3595f3c5c9482326
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.mad.289747.14.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)