Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Elijah Majak Buoi case — U.S. District Court, D. Mass. Joint Status Report — United States v. Buoi (Dkt. 54, D. Mass.)

Court filing

Joint Status Report — United States v. Buoi (Dkt. 54, D. Mass.)

Summary

A joint status report under Local Rule 116.5(b) in United States v. Elijah Majak Buoi, Criminal No. 20-cr-10130-FDS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed November 3, 2020 as Document 54. The parties state that the government has provided its automatic discovery production with no outstanding requests, ask that expert disclosures be due 45 days before trial, and report that they are not engaged in plea discussions. They estimate that a trial would last approximately 2 weeks.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed November 3, 2020 in Elijah Majak Buoi; one of 7 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Filed2020-11-03

Cite this document

“Joint Status Report — United States v. Buoi (Dkt. 54, D. Mass.).” U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 1:20-cr-10130, Doc. 54, filed 2020-11-03. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-elijah-majak-buoi/2020-11-03-joint-status-report-dkt-54/, SHA-256 5ea56be3967cf1b1bc7ee1ebb0f9ea2b44f18245dd7be8adabbfc9af57fb0767.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Case 1:20-cr-10130-FDS Document 54 Filed 11/03/20 Page 1 of 3




                              IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                       )
                                               )
                                               )
        v.                                     )Criminal No. 20-cr-10130-FDS
                                               )
ELIJAH MAJAK BUOI,                             )
                                               )
                        Defendant              )


                                        JOINT STATUS REPORT

        Now come the parties jointly and submit this status report pursuant to Local Rule 116.5(b). The

parties state as follows:


        1.      The government has provided its automatic discovery production. There are no

outstanding discovery requests at this time, but counsel reserves the right to request discovery at a later

date. The government understands that it has an ongoing and continuing duty to produce discovery.


        2.      No protective order is necessary at this time.


        3.      The parties believe it is too early to establish a motions date, and request to do so at the

next status conference.


        4.      The parties request that expert disclosures be due 45 days before trial.


        5.      The parties are not currently engaging in plea discussions. In the event the case proceeds

to trial, it is estimated that the trial may last approximately 2 weeks.

            Case 1:20-cr-10130-FDS Document 54 Filed 11/03/20 Page 2 of 3




       6.      The status conference scheduled for November 6, 2020 is the second status conference in

this matter, but the first attended by Attorney Owens. The parties jointly request that the instant report be

considered in lieu of a status conference, and move for a status conference in 60 days to allow defense

counsel time to review the case file and the automatic discovery produced in this matter.


       7.      The court has excluded the time from September 1, 2020, through November 6, 2020 the

date the status conference was originally scheduled for. The parties agree that the time from November

6, 2020 until the next status conference following the status conference on November 6, 2020 should be

excluded. The exclusion of such time is necessary to provide counsel for the defendant and the attorney

for the government the reasonable time necessary to attempt to resolve the matter short of trial, and,

should those efforts fail, to effectively prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The parties further agree that the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §§

3161(h)(7)(A), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); § 3161(h)(1)(G).




Respectfully submitted,

ELIJAH BUOI                                                    ANDREW LELLING
                                                               United States Attorney
/s/ Bryan Owens                                                /s/ Mackenzie Queenin
Bryan Owens                                                    Mackenzie Queenin
100 State Street, 9th Floor                                    United States Attorney’s Office
Boston, MA 02109                       `                       One Courthouse Way
                                                               Boston, MA 02210

         Case 1:20-cr-10130-FDS Document 54 Filed 11/03/20 Page 3 of 3




                                        Certificate of Service

       I, Mackenzie A. Queenin, hereby certify that this document was this day filed through the ECF
system and will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of
Electronic Filing (“NEF”).


Date: November 3, 2020                                           /s/ Mackenzie A. Queenin
                                                                 Mackenzie A. Queenin

File and source

File
54.pdf
Size
121,676 bytes
SHA-256
5ea56be3967cf1b1bc7ee1ebb0f9ea2b44f18245dd7be8adabbfc9af57fb0767
Our copy
54.pdf
Back to top