Court filing
Affidavit — United States v. Smith (Dkt. 1-2, D. Mass.)
Summary
Christina Rosen, a Special Agent with the Department of Labor's Office of Inspector General, swore this affidavit for a criminal complaint charging Devin Smith with wire fraud and aggravated identity theft (18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1028A). It was filed October 27, 2021 as Dkt. 1-2 in No. 1:21-mj-05526 (D. Mass.). The affidavit ties a Comcast IP address subscribed to by Smith, a 28-year-old resident of Michigan, to twelve UI claims filed in Massachusetts between March 22, 2020 and April 2, 2020 in other people's names, each listing Smith's address for payments. It says the same IP address was used to submit approximately 88 claims in eight other states, which paid out approximately $275,000 in benefits according to DOL records. It also lists claims in Smith's own name in several states and online purchases made with stolen credit card information.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed October 27, 2021 in Devin Smith; one of 1 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-10-27 |
Cite this document
“Affidavit — United States v. Smith (Dkt. 1-2, D. Mass.).”
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 1:21-mj-05526, Doc. 1-2, filed 2021-10-27. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-devin-smith-mad-1-21-mj-05526/2021-10-27-affidavit-dkt-1-2/
, SHA-256 1ff41b6f3edd51e985d1330833193374cd88b552481de82406ac7767c2a91ad5.Full text
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 1 of 12
AFFIDAVIT
I, Christina Rosen, being duly sworn, hereby depose and state as follows:
INTRODUCTION & AGENT BACKGROUND
1. I am employed as a Special Agent with the United States Department of Labor,
Office of Inspector General, Office of Investigations (“DOL OIG”) in Boston, Massachusetts.
My responsibilities as a Special Agent with DOL OIG include investigating fraud, waste and
abuse of Department of Labor programs, employees, and departments. I have been employed by
the United States government as a Special Agent since October 2007. I am a graduate of the
Criminal Investigator Training Program of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in
Glynco, Georgia, and have received extensive training in criminal investigation procedures and
criminal law. In 2005, I graduated from Northeastern University with a Bachelor’s degree in
Criminal Justice. In 2006, I graduated from Boston University with a Master’s degree in
Criminal Justice.
2. I am currently investigating DEVIN SMITH (“SMITH”) for his involvement in
wire fraud and aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1028A (the
“TARGET OFFENSES”).
3. I make this affidavit in support of an application for a criminal complaint
charging SMITH with the TARGET OFFENSES and a warrant for SMITH’s arrest.
4. Based on the facts set forth below, there is probable cause to believe that
SMITH committed the TARGET OFFENSES.
5. The facts in this affidavit come from my personal observations and review of
records, my training and experience, and information obtained from other agents and
witnesses. This affidavit is intended to show merely that there is sufficient probable cause for
the requested warrant and does not set forth all of my knowledge about this matter.
1
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 2 of 12
BACKGROUND
UI Framework
6. The U.S. Department of Labor’s UI programs provide unemployment benefits to
unemployed workers who meet certain eligibility requirements. UI is a joint state-federal
program that provides cash benefits to eligible workers. Each state administers its UI program,
but all states follow the same guidelines established by federal law.
7. While eligibility requirements vary among states, a worker typically qualifies if:
(1) the worker is unemployed through no fault of the worker, meaning that the separation from
the job is due to a lack of available work, (2) the worker meets time-worked and wages-earned
requirements, and (3) the worker meets any additional state requirements.
Massachusetts UI
8. Massachusetts UI benefits are funded by the UI Trust Fund, which is in turn
funded by federal funds and state-imposed taxes on employers. The Massachusetts
Department of Unemployment Affairs (“DUA”) administers the Massachusetts UI program.
9. Private, for profit, employers in Massachusetts are required by law to submit
quarterly employment and wage detail reports to DUA. DUA then calculates UI contributions,
which are made quarterly to the state UI Trust Fund. For a claimant to be eligible to receive UI
benefit payments from the UI Trust Fund, a claimant’s Social Security Number (“SSN”) needs to
be reported by an employer to DUA in the quarterly employment and wage detail reports.
10. When a claimant applies for UI, the claimant must first create an online account.
Creating a UI online account requires that the claimant review eligibility requirements, approve
the data privacy authorization, and provide personal information, including:
a. Their SSN, date of birth, phone number, email address, residential address, and
mailing address.
2
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 3 of 12
b. Their employment history, such as their former employer’s name and address,
the reason for their unemployed status, how many hours they normally worked
in a week, and the start and end dates of employment.
c. The effective date of the UI claim, any other types of employment, and whether
the claimant applied for UI in another states.
11. In the “Claimant Authentication” section, the claimant’s SSN, date of birth,
gender, and legal name must be entered for verification. The claimant is then prompted to
create a password and select a security question and answer. Once the online account is
created, the claimant enters contact information in the “General Information” section. A
claimant may choose to receive correspondence from DUA in hard copy or electronically. In
the “Payment Options” portion of the “General Information” section, the claimant is informed
that they can choose to receive UI benefits via direct deposit or debit card, and that the first
payment will be made via paper check.
12. Prior to submitting the UI claim, the claimant also must certify, “under penalty
of perjury, all information provided is as complete and accurate to the best of my ability.”
13. UI claims submitted to DUA are processed via a server in Massachusetts. UI
claims are frequently submitted via the internet, and I understand that individuals who submit
UI-related information to DUA, via the internet, cause wires to be transmitted to and/or from
this Massachusetts-based server.
14. DUA’s UI system tracks activity associated with each registered account,
including the IP addresses assigned to electronic devices used to initiate activity on accounts.
Federal and State Pandemic Responses
15. On March 27, 2020, the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law. The CARES Act provided additional
3
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 4 of 12
funds for traditional UI programs and created a new temporary federal unemployment
insurance program called Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (“PUA”).1
16. DUA administered the Massachusetts PUA program.
17. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, DUA took measures to speed up the
process of paying out UI benefits, including by reducing its fraud protection measures. For
example, DUA historically required a one-week waiting period before paying UI benefits to
allow DUA to verify eligibility with both the applicant and former employer. In response to
COVID-19, DUA temporarily eliminated the one-week waiting period. DUA also made a
change to the initial manner of payment. DUA’s traditional fraud protection measures
required that the first UI payment be made via paper check mailed the applicant. In
response to COVID-19, the DUA eliminated the paper check requirement.
18. State unemployment agencies, including DUA, typically require a claimant
to provide an email address in connection with their unemployment claim.
PROBABLE CAUSE
SMITH Background
19. SMITH is a 28-year-old resident of Michigan.
20. The investigation identified SMITH’s phone number as (313) 909-0771
(“SMITH’s phone number”). The investigation confirmed SMITH’s phone number through,
among other methods, a review of T-Mobile records listing SMITH as the subscriber.
21. The investigation identified SMITH’s address as 35330 Van Born Road,
Apartment 201, Wayne, Michigan (“SMITH’s address”) through, among other methods, U.S.
1
PUA provides unemployment insurance benefits for individuals who are not eligible for
other types of unemployment benefits (e.g., the self-employed, independent contractors, or gig
economy workers). PUA provided payments for these benefits beginning on or after January 27,
2020 and ending before December 31, 2020, for a maximum period of 39 weeks. On or about
December 27, 2020, recipients of PUA were granted 13 weeks of Extended Benefits. The
American Rescue Act has now further extended PUA benefits through September 4, 2021.
4
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 5 of 12
Postal Service records and information obtained from the Michigan Department of Motor
Vehicles.
22. IP address 68.41.206.111 (“the 68 IP address”) belongs to Comcast Cable
Communications, LLC (“Comcast”), and Comcast records reflect that the 68 IP address is
subscribed to by SMITH, listing SMITH’s name, address, and phone number. Multiple UI
claims have been submitted in SMITH’s name from the 68 IP address.
23. SMITH has a PNC Bank account (last four 6026) and a Metabank account (last
four 5882), both of which have been used to submit fraudulent unemployment claims.
24. SMITH has used and controlled the email account ROLEX1237@mail.com
(“SMITH’s email account”). A review of the contents of SMITH’s email account demonstrate
that SMITH has used the account between approximately 2019 and 2021 to handle personal
affairs. For example, SMITH’s email account contained a September 2109 demand letter
directed to SMITH at SMITH’s address requesting rent payments. As another example, in
March 2020, SMITH used SMITH’s email account to submit an unemployment claim in his
own name in Michigan. Further, on multiple occasions, SMITH used SMITH’s email account
to process financial transactions through Venmo and Plastiq.2
25. As described in more detail below, SMITH also used SMITH’s email account o
obtain commercial goods using stolen credit card information and submit fraudulent
unemployment claims.
SMITH’s Use of Stolen Credit Card Information
26. A review of the contents of SMITH’s email account shows that SMITH used the
account to purchase commercial goods using the names and credit card information of third
2
Venmo and Plastiq are mobile payment services that allow users to send or receive payments
electronically. Both Venmo and Plastiq require users to provide an email address to open an
account.
5
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 8 of 12
29. Based on my training and experience investigating financial frauds and identity
theft, I understand that a common method of using stolen credit card information is to purchase
an item online using the stolen credit card information and have the item shipped to an address
controlled by the fraudster.
SMITH’s Fraudulent Unemployment Claims
30. On approximately August 11, 2020, a Mississippi UI claim was submitted in
SMITH’s name. The claim was submitted from the 68 IP address and listed SMITH’s address
and SMITH’s email account. On approximately August 18, 2020 (seven days later), a West
Virginia UI claim was also submitted in SMITH’s name. As with SMITH’s Mississippi UI
claim, SMITH’s West Virginia UI claim was submitted from the 68 IP address and listed
SMITH’s address and SMITH’s email account.
31. UI claims in Nevada and Michigan were also submitted in SMITH’s name from
the 68 IP address. Both claims also listed SMITH’s email account. The Nevada UI claim
directed payments to SMITH’s PNC Bank account and the Michigan UI claim directed
payments to SMITH’s Metabank account.
32. The investigation also identified two PUA claims submitted to Massachusetts
DUA in SMITH’s name on approximately September 13, 2020. One PUA claim directed
payments to SMITH’s PNC Bank account and the other claim directed payments to SMITH’s
Metabank account.
33. A review of PNC Bank and Metabank records also reveals that SMITH has been
using both accounts to receive Rhode Island UI benefits since at least June 2020.
34. SMITH has lived in Michigan from 2020 to present, as SMITH himself would
have attested to in his Michigan unemployment claim, and therefore is not entitled to
unemployment benefits from states other than Michigan.
8
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 9 of 12
SMITH Submitted Fraudulent Massachusetts UI Claims in Others’ Names and PII
35. Shortly after the CARES Act passed, the DUA alerted DOL OIG of numerous
suspicious Massachusetts UI claims that were submitted using common IP addresses and out-
of-state mailing addresses, including the 68 IP address and SMITH’s mailing address.
Specifically, the investigation identified twelve UI claims submitted between March 22, 2020
and April 2, 2020 from the 68 IP address and listing SMITH’s address as the mailing address
for payments. These claims were submitted in the names and PII of individuals other than
SMITH.
36. According to T-Mobile records, within the same time-period, on March 31, 2020,
SMITH’s phone made three calls to (858) 898-7292, which I understand to be a Bank of
America’s customer service line for Massachusetts DUA prepaid debit cards.
37. Between March 25 and March 31, 2020, multiple other UI claims were submitted
from the 68 IP address directing payments to two addresses within several miles from SMITH’s
address.3 Based on my training and experience, I understand that individuals committing UI
fraud will often receive mail at multiple locations close to their residence in an attempt to evade
detection.
38. The investigation identified other commonalities among the claims submitted
from the 68 IP address. In each instance, the “claimant” submitted the claim online, claimed
eligibility based on COVID-19, requested the mailing of a Bank of America debit card to
receive the UI benefits, listed a residential address in Massachusetts, and listed a mailing
address in the Detroit metro area. Other commonalities were also identified among individual
claims. For example, in response to a security question about the claimant’s city of birth,
multiple claims provided the same response (“born”).
3
The two addresses are 1421 and 1427 Stacy Drive, Canton, Michigan (“the Stacey Drive
addresses”).
9
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 10 of 12
39. Based on victim interviews and open-source research conducted as part of the
investigation, multiple “claimants” on the UI claims discussed above are not unemployed
and/or living in Michigan but are instead practicing medical professionals living in
Massachusetts.
SMITH Submitted Fraudulent Claims in Others’ Names and PII in Eight Other States
40. In addition to the fraudulent Massachusetts UI claims and the other fraudulent
unemployment claims in SMITH’s own name, the 68 IP address was also used to submit
approximately 88 claims in other states, including Arizona, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota,
Mississippi, Nevada, Washington, and West Virginia. According to DOL records, those claims
have paid out approximately $275,000 in benefits.
41. For example, on approximately May 22, 2020, a Michigan unemployment claim
was submitted in the name and PII of J.M. The claim used SMITH’s Metabank account and
SMITH’s email account, both of which were used on SMITH’s own Michigan UI claim
(discussed above). According to information available to law enforcement, J.M. is a real person
living in Washington State.
42. Other claims submitted from the 68 IP address did not provide bank account
information, but instead requested that payments be mailed to SMITH’s address.4 For example,
on March 21, 2020, a Minnesota unemployment claim was submitted from the 68 IP address in
the name and PII of S.A. The claim used SMITH’s email account and directed payments to be
mailed to SMITH’s address. According to information available to law enforcement, S.A. is a
real person living in Minnesota.
4
The investigation identified fifteen UI claims in states other than Massachusetts directing
payments specifically to SMITH’s address, including from Washington state, Michigan,
Mississippi, West Virginia, and Minnesota, accounting for approximately $50,000 in payments.
10
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:21-mj-05526-JGD Document 1-2 Filed 10/27/21 Page 12 of 12
Oct 27, 2021File and source
- File
- 1-att2-complaint.pdf
- Size
- 1,383,110 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1ff41b6f3edd51e985d1330833193374cd88b552481de82406ac7767c2a91ad5
- Our copy
- 1-att2-complaint.pdf