Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Curtis Porch case — U.S. District Court, M.D. Ga. Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Porch (Dkt. 56, M.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Porch (Dkt. 56, M.D. Ga.)

Summary

A preliminary order of forfeiture and money judgment by Judge Clay D. Land in United States v. Curtis Porch, Case No. 4:21-CR-23 (CDL), in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Columbus Division, filed May 23, 2022 as Document 56. It recites that on January 4, 2022 Porch pled guilty to Count Four of the indictment, charging that he and co-defendant Dereen Porch converted to their own use approximately $364,200 in Small Business Administration loan and grant proceeds. It enters a personal money judgment of $133,000.00, the theft proceeds obtained by the defendant, and forfeits listed vehicles.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed May 23, 2022 in Curtis Porch; one of 4 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Filed2022-05-23

Cite this document

“Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Porch (Dkt. 56, M.D. Ga.).” U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, No. 4:21-cr-00023, Doc. 56, filed 2022-05-23. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-curtis-porch/2022-05-23-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture-money-judgment-dkt-56/, SHA-256 c60d2865b4fe029005318ea594f5a4cfd7876c640cb67736679086a7f512d9ba.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Case 4:21-cr-00023-CDL-MSH Document 56 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 6




                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                                COLUMBUS DIVISION

                                               :
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                       :
                                               :
      v.                                       : CASE NO. 4:21-CR-23 (CDL)
                                               :
CURTIS PORCH                                   :
                                               :
            Defendant                          :
                                               :


                PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

           WHEREAS, on January 4, 2022, Defendant Curtis Porch (hereinafter “Porch” or

  “Defendant”), pled guilty to Count Four of the Indictment charging him with Theft of

  Government Property, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641;

           AND WHEREAS, the Indictment contained a Forfeiture Notice, pursuant to which

  the United States seeks forfeiture under Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C),

  in conjunction with Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any property

  constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such

  offense(s);

           AND WHEREAS, the Defendant pled guilty to a written Plea Agreement to Count

  Four of the Indictment charging that Porch and Co-Defendant Dereen Porch, did willfully

  and knowingly steal and convert to their own use loan/grant proceeds from the Small

  Business Administration, in a value exceeding $1,000, to wit: approximately $364,200 in

      Case 4:21-cr-00023-CDL-MSH Document 56 Filed 05/23/22 Page 2 of 6




United States currency, of the goods and property of the United States; all in violation of

Title 18, United States Code, Section 641;

       AND WHEREAS, the United States has filed a Motion and Memorandum for the

Issuance of a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture consisting of a personal money judgment,

specific directly forfeitable property, and a substitute asset;

       WHEREAS, the Court has determined, based on the evidence already in the

record, and the evidence set forth in the Defendant’s Plea Agreement, (1) that Defendant

has an ownership interest in the vehicles; (2) that the vehicles are subject to forfeiture

pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), in conjunction with Title

28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), or as a substitute asset thereof; and (3) that the

United States has established the requisite nexus between the aforesaid offense and the

following money judgment and property, to wit:

       MONEY JUDGMENT

       A.     A personal money judgment in the amount of one hundred thirty-three

              thousand dollars ($133,000.00), which represents the total amount of theft

              proceeds obtained by the Defendant, Title 18, United States Code, Section

              641;

       VEHICLES

       A.     One (1) 2012 Porsche, Model: Panamera 2, VIN: WP0AA2A77CL014697;

       B.     One (1) 2016 Dodge, Model: Charger R/T, VIN: 2C3CDXCT9GH203169;



                                              2

      Case 4:21-cr-00023-CDL-MSH Document 56 Filed 05/23/22 Page 3 of 6




      C.     One (1) 2015 Land Rover, Model: Range Rover, VIN:

             SALWR2VF6FA508123.

      SUBSTITUTE ASSET

      A.    One (1) 2016 Chevrolet, Model: Camaro, VIN: 1G1FF1R7XG0176507; and

(hereinafter referred to as the “money judgment” or “subject property”)

        WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides

that “no ancillary proceeding is required to the extent that the forfeiture consists of a

money judgment”;

      NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED

THAT:

      1.     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), 18 U.S.C. § 3554,

and Rule 32.2(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court finds by a

preponderance of the evidence that the United States has demonstrated the required

nexus between the money judgment amount, subject property, and the offense(s) of

conviction, and the Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the money judgment

amount and subject property.

      2.     Upon the entry of this Order, in accordance with FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.2(b)(3),

the Attorney General (or a designee) is authorized to seize the vehicles, and to conduct

any discovery that may assist in identifying, locating or disposing of the vehicles or

substitute assets, and to commence any applicable proceeding to comply with statutes



                                           3

      Case 4:21-cr-00023-CDL-MSH Document 56 Filed 05/23/22 Page 4 of 6




governing third-party rights, including giving notice of this Order. No such notice or

ancillary proceeding is necessary as to the judgment for a sum of money. FED. R. CRIM.

P. Rule 32.2(c)(1).

       3.     To the extent that the foregoing property includes specific property and is

not limited to a judgment for a sum of money, the United States shall publish notice of

the Order and its intent to dispose of the subject property in such a manner as the United

States Attorney General (or his designee) may direct. The United States may also, to the

extent practicable, provide written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest

in the subject property.

       4.     Any person, other than the above-named Defendant, asserting a legal

interest in the subject property must, within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice, or no

later than sixty (60) days from the first day of publication on the official internet

government forfeiture site, www.forfeiture.gov, whichever is earlier, petition the Court

for a hearing without a jury to adjudicate the validity of his or her alleged interest in the

vehicles, and for an amendment of the Order of Forfeiture, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n),

as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), through 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C).

       5.     Pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.2(b)(4), this Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture/Money Judgment shall become final as to the Defendant at the time of

sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment. If no




                                             4

      Case 4:21-cr-00023-CDL-MSH Document 56 Filed 05/23/22 Page 5 of 6




third-party files a timely claim, this Order shall become the Final Order of Forfeiture, as

provided by FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.2(c)(2).

       6.     Any petition filed by a third-party asserting an interest in the subject

property shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the

nature and extent of the petitioner’s right, title or interest in the subject property, the time

and circumstances of the petitioner’s acquisition of the right, title or interest in the subject

property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner’s claim and the relief sought.

       7.     After the disposition of any motion filed under FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.2(c)(1)(A)

and before a hearing on the petition, discovery may be conducted in accordance with the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon a showing that such discovery is necessary or

desirable to resolve factual issues.

       8.     The United States shall have clear title to any property subject to forfeiture

following the Court’s disposition of all third-party interests, or if none, following the

expiration of the period provided in 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. §

2461(c), through 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), for the filing of third-party petitions.

       9.     As issued this date, this Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment includes a

judgment for a sum of money. The United States may, at any time, move pursuant to

FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.2(e), to amend this Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment if the

Government locates specific assets traceable to the subject property or other assets subject




                                               5

      Case 4:21-cr-00023-CDL-MSH Document 56 Filed 05/23/22 Page 6 of 6




to forfeiture as substitute assets pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 28

U.S.C. § 2461(c), through 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C).

       10.    If the amount collected from any substitute assets exceeds the personal

money judgment amount, satisfying it in whole, the United States shall release any funds

in such excess to Defendant Porch.

       11.    The United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, shall retain

jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Order of Forfeiture/Money

Judgment.

       SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of May, 2022.




                                                 S/Clay D. Land
                                                 CLAY D. LAND, JUDGE
                                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                                 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA




                                             6

File and source

File
56.pdf
Size
116,782 bytes
SHA-256
c60d2865b4fe029005318ea594f5a4cfd7876c640cb67736679086a7f512d9ba
Our copy
56.pdf
Back to top