Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for Proceeds — United States v. Rogers

Record facts

U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville Division) · No. 3:24-cr-00190-WWB-SJH · Doc. 52 · 2025-08-19 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for Proceeds in United States v. Carnisha Maurica Rogers, Case No. 3:24-cr-00190-WWB-SJH, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, filed August 19, 2025 as Doc. 52. The order grants the United States' consent motion (Doc. 51) for forfeiture of $20,832 under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2. The court finds that the defendant obtained $20,832 as a result of the wire fraud offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 charged in Count Eight of the Indictment, to which she pleaded guilty. It further orders that, because the proceeds were transferred to third parties and cannot be located, the United States may seek substitute assets up to that amount under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p). The two-page order was signed in Jacksonville on August 18, 2025.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  
 
 
 
v. 
  
Case No. 3:24-cr-190-WWB-SJH 
 
CARNISHA MAURICA ROGERS 
 
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE FOR PROCEEDS 
 
 
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States’ Consent Motion 
for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture of Proceeds in the amount of $20,832, pursuant to 18 
U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2.(b)(2), which 
upon entry shall be a final order of forfeiture as to the defendant. 
After being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds that the United 
States has established that the defendant obtained $20,832 as a result of the wire fraud 
offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, as charged in Count Eight of the Indictment, to 
which she has pleaded guilty.  
 
Accordingly, it is hereby: 
 
 
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that for good cause shown, the United States’ 
consent motion (Doc. 51) is GRANTED.  
 
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeds of the offense were transferred to 
third parties, and the United States cannot locate the proceeds upon the exercise of due 
diligence. Accordingly, under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. 
§ 2461(c), the United States may seek, as a substitute asset in satisfaction of this 
judgment, forfeiture of any of the defendant’s property up to the $20,832 order of 
Case 3:24-cr-00190-WWB-SJH     Document 52     Filed 08/19/25     Page 1 of 2 PageID 170

2 
forfeiture. The Court retains jurisdiction to enter any further order necessary for the 
forfeiture and disposition of any substitute asset. 
 
DONE and ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on August 18, 2025.  
 
 
Copies to: 
Jennifer Harrington, AUSA 
Counsel of Record 
Case 3:24-cr-00190-WWB-SJH     Document 52     Filed 08/19/25     Page 2 of 2 PageID 171

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.433477.52.0.pdf

Size

152,999 bytes

SHA-256

0fa9e433c78cd3e7a071f18ce8746d635a4e7dae3bf381387036a9e5d8625663

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.433477.52.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)