Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Bauer Plea Agreement — United States v. Mandy Ellen Bauer

Court filing

Plea Agreement — United States v. Mandy Ellen Bauer

Filed February 2, 2022 in U.S. v. Bauer; one of 13 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Filed2022-02-02

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky · No. 1:22-cr-00004-GNS · Doc. 12 · 2022-02-02 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

JAMES J. VILT, JR. - CLERK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEB 07 2022
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT BOWLING GREEN U.S. DISTRICT COURT
WEST’N. DIST. KENTUCKY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF
¥ CRIMINAL NO. }'02<K- 4-(85 - |
MANDY ELLEN BAUER DEFENDANT
PLEA AGREEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United
States of America, by Michael A. Bennett, United States Attorney for the Western District of
Kentucky, and defendant, MANDY ELLEN BAUER, and her attorney, William Butler, have
agreed upon the following:

1. Defendant agrees to waive Indictment by the grand jury and to plead guilty to a
felony Information which will be filed against defendant by the United States Attorney for the
Western District of Kentucky. That information will charge defendant with violations of Title
18, United States Code, Section 1343.

2. Defendant has read the charges against her contained in the Information, and
those charges have been fully explained to her by her attorney. Defendant fully understands the
nature and elements of the crimes with which she has been charged.

3. Defendant will enter a voluntary plea of guilty to Counts 1 through 9 in this case.
Defendant will plead guilty because she is in fact guilty of the charges. The parties agree to the
following factual basis for this plea:

All events occurred in Green County in the Western District of Kentucky.
Mandy Bauer had a business called Family Personal Sales (FPS). In 2020 FPS did not
have any employees or wage expenses. FPS did not file any Forms 941 or W-2s in 2019 or
2020, and has never made any tax deposits.

On April 2, 2020, Bauer filed an application (3301428208) for a Small Business
Administration (SBA) Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) for FPS. Bauer falsely claimed
that FPS had six employees, $29,500 in gross revenue, and $1,800 in lost rents due to the
disaster. The potential loan amount was $1,800. Bauer sent an interstate wire communication
in furtherance of her fraudulent EIDL application.

On April 5, 2020, Bauer filed an application (3302541838) for a SBA EIDL for FPS.
Bauer falsely claimed that FPS had six employees, $52,300 in gross revenue, and $9,000 in lost
rents due to the disaster. The potential loan amount was $9,000. Bauer sent an interstate wire
communication in furtherance of her fraudulent EIDL application.

On April 7, 2020, Bauer submitted a SBA Form 2483, Paycheck Protection Program
Borrower Application Form, to ReadyCap Lending. Bauer falsely claimed that FPS had
average monthly payroll of $11,100 and six employees. The potential loan amount was
$30,800. In furtherance of her fraudulent PPP loan application, Bauer sent an interstate wire
communication.

On April 8, 2020, Bauer submitted a SBA Form 2483 to ReadyCap Lending. Bauer
falsely claimed that FPS had average monthly payroll of $11,000 and six employees. The
potential loan amount was $27,700. In furtherance of her fraudulent PPP loan application,
Bauer sent an interstate wire communication.

On April 13, 2020, Bauer filed an application (330697682) for a SBA EIDL for FPS.

Bauer falsely claimed that FPS had six employees, $28,000 in gross revenue, and $15,000 in
cost of goods sold. The potential loan amount was $6,500. Bauer sent an interstate wire
communication in furtherance of her fraudulent EIDL application.

On April 29, 2020, Bauer submitted a SBA Form 2483 to ReadyCap Lending. Bauer
falsely claimed that FPS had average monthly payroll of $13,496 and six employees. The
potential loan amount was $33,700. In furtherance of her fraudulent PPP loan application,
Bauer sent an interstate wire communication.

On May 29, 2020, Bauer faxed a Form 7200, Advance Payment of Employer Credits
Due to COVID-19, to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Bauer falsely claimed that FPS had
10 employees and $37,000 in quarterly wages, when in fact FPS did not have any employees or
wage expenses. Bauer requested a $70,000 advance payment. Bauer sent an interstate wire
communication in furtherance of her false application.

On June 29, 2020, Bauer filed an application (33073299618) for a SBA EIDL for FPS.
Bauer falsely claimed that FPS had 10 employees, $43,900 in gross revenue, and $26,000 in
cost of goods sold. The potential loan amount was $8,950. In furtherance of her fraudulent
EIDL application, Bauer sent an interstate wire communication.

On July 1, 2020, Bauer faxed another Form 7200. Bauer falsely claimed that FPS had
six employees and $37,350 in quarterly wages, when in fact FPS did not have any employees or
wage expenses. Bauer requested a $43,064.55 advance payment. Bauer sent an interstate wire
communication in furtherance of her false application.

4. Defendant understands that the charges to which she will plead guilty carry a
combined maximum term of imprisonment of 180 years, a combined maximum fine of

$2,250,000, and a maximum 3 year term of supervised release. Defendant understands that an
additional term of imprisonment may be ordered if the terms of the supervised release are
violated, as explained in 18 U.S.C. § 3583.

5. Defendant recognizes that pleading guilty may have consequences with respect to
his immigration status if he is not a citizen of the United States. Under federal law, a broad range
of crimes are removable offenses, which may include the offense to which Defendant is pleading
guilty. In addition, if he is a naturalized citizen, Defendant acknowledges that certain convictions,
which may include Defendant’s conviction, may expose him to denaturalization under federal
law. Because removal, denaturalization, and other immigration consequences are handled in
separate proceedings, Defendant understands that no one, including his attorney or the U.S. District
Court, can predict with certainty how his conviction may affect his immigration, naturalization, or
citizenship status. Defendant agrees to plead guilty with a full understanding that this guilty plea
may lead to adverse immigration consequences, including denaturalization and possible automatic
removal from the United States.

6. Defendant understands that if a term of imprisonment of more than one year is
imposed, the Sentencing Guidelines require a term of supervised release and that she will then be
subject to certain conditions of release. §§5D1.1, 5D1.2, 5D1.3.

7. Defendant understands that by pleading guilty, she surrenders certain rights set
forth below. Defendant's attorney has explained those rights to her and the consequences of her
waiver of those rights, including the following:

A. If defendant persists in a plea of not guilty to the charges against
her, she has the right to a public and speedy trial. The trial could either be a jury
trial or a trial by the judge sitting without a jury. If there is a jury trial, the jury

would have to agree unanimously before it could return a verdict of either guilty
or not guilty. The jury would be instructed that defendant is presumed innocent

and that it could not convict her unless, after hearing all the evidence, it was

persuaded of defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

B. At a trial, whether by a jury or a judge, the United States would be
required to present its witnesses and other evidence against defendant. Defendant
would be able to confront those government witnesses and her attorney would be
able to cross-examine them. In turn, defendant could present witnesses and other
evidence in her own behalf. If the witnesses for defendant would not appear
voluntarily, she could require their attendance through the subpoena power of the
Court.

C. At a trial, defendant would have a privilege against self-
incrimination and she could decline to testify, without any inference of guilt being
drawn from her refusal to testify. If defendant desired to do so, she could testify
in her own behalf.

8. Defendant understands that the United States Attorney's Office has an obligation
to fully apprise the District Court and the United States Probation Office of all facts pertinent to
the sentencing process, and to respond to all legal or factual inquiries that might arise either
before, during, or after sentencing. Defendant admits all acts and essential elements of the
Information counts to which she pleads guilty.

9. Defendant acknowledges liability for the special assessment mandated by 18
U.S.C. § 3013 and will pay the assessment in the amount of $900.00 to the United States District

Court Clerk's Office by the date of sentencing.
10.

11.

At the time of sentencing, the United States will

-recommend a sentence of imprisonment at the lowest end of the
applicable Guideline Range, but not less than any mandatory
minimum term of imprisonment required by law. The defendant
reserves the right to request a non-Guideline sentence.

-recommend a fine of $7,500.00, to be due and payable on the date
of sentencing. !

-recommend a reduction of 3 levels below the otherwise applicable
Guideline for "acceptance of responsibility" as provided by
§3E1.1(a) and (b), provided the defendant does not engage in
future conduct which violates any federal or state law, violates a
condition of bond, constitutes obstruction of justice, or otherwise
demonstrates a lack of acceptance of responsibility. Should such
conduct occur and the United States, therefore, opposes the
reduction for acceptance, this plea agreement remains binding and
the defendant will not be allowed to withdraw her plea.

-stipulate that the amount of intended loss involved in this case is
$231.514.55, and the amount of actual loss is $0.00.

Both parties have independently reviewed the Sentencing Guidelines applicable in

this case, and in their best judgment and belief, conclude as follows:

A. The Applicable Offense Level should be determined as follows:

2B1.1(a)(1) (base offense level) 7
2B1.1(b)(1)(F) (intended loss over $150,000) + 10
3E1.1(a) & (b) (acceptance of responsibility) - 3

FINAL OFFENSE LEVEL 14

B. The Criminal History of defendant shall be determined upon

completion of the presentence investigation, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c).

Both parties reserve the right to object to the USSG §4A1.1 calculation of

' The defendant acknowledges that she has read the Notice and Penalty Pages attached to the Information, and that
she understands the interest and penalty provisions applicable to the fine imposed and included in the Judgment
entered by the Court, said Notice and Penalty Pages are incorporated herein by reference.

6
defendant’s criminal history. The parties agree to not seek a departure from the

Criminal History Category pursuant to §4A1.3.

C. The foregoing statements of applicability of sections of the Sentencing

Guidelines and the statement of facts are not binding upon the Court. The defendant

understands the Court will independently calculate the Guidelines at sentencing and

defendant may not withdraw the plea of guilty solely because the Court does not agree
with either the statement of facts or Sentencing Guideline application.

12. | Defendant is aware of her right to appeal her conviction and that 18 U.S.C. § 3742
affords a defendant the right to appeal the sentence imposed. Unless based on claims of
ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial misconduct, the Defendant knowingly and
voluntarily waives the right (a) to directly appeal her conviction and the resulting sentence
pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and (b) to contest or collaterally attack
her conviction and the resulting sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or otherwise. Defendant
specifically waives on appeal or in a collateral attack any argument that (1) the statute to which
the defendant is pleading guilty is unconstitutional and (2) the admitted conduct does not fall
within the scope of the statute.

13. | Defendant agrees not to pursue or initiate any civil claims or suits against the
United States of America, its agencies or employees, whether or not presently known to
defendant, arising out of the investigation or prosecution of the offenses covered by this
Agreement.

14. The defendant hereby waives all rights, whether asserted directly or by a
representative, to request or receive from any department or agency of the United States any

records pertaining to the investigation or prosecution of this case, including without limitation
any records that may be sought under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, or the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a.

15. Defendant agrees to interpose no objection to the United States transferring
evidence or providing information concerning defendant and this offense, to other state and
federal agencies or other organizations, including, but not limited to the Internal Revenue
Service, other law enforcement agencies, and any licensing and regulatory bodies, or to the entry
of an order under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) authorizing transfer to the Examination Division of the
Internal Revenue Service of defendant's documents, or documents of third persons, in possession
of the Grand Jury, the United States Attorney, or the Criminal Investigation Division of the
Internal Revenue Service. Defendant further agrees to the entry of an order under Fed. R. Crim.
P. 6(e) authorizing the use of documents in possession of the Grand Jury to be used during the
defendant’s deposition as contemplated in paragraph 9 of this Agreement.

| 16. | Defendant agrees to forfeit and abandon any right to any and all evidence and
property seized during the course of this investigation (including but not limited to any item
subject to forfeiture), and waives any right to seek the return of any property pursuant to Fed. R.
Crim. P. 41 or otherwise. Defendant understands and agrees that items seized during the course
of this investigation will be destroyed or otherwise disposed of by the seizing law enforcement
agency.

17. | The Defendant understands and agrees that, consistent with the provisions of 18
U.S.C. § 3143, following the change of plea the defendant may be detained pending sentencing.

18. It is understood that pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(B), the United States’s

recommendations are not binding on the Court. In other words, the Court is not bound by the
sentencing recommendation and defendant will have no right to withdraw her guilty plea if the
Court decides not to accept the sentencing recommendation set forth in this Agreement.

19. Defendant agrees that the disposition provided for within this Agreement is fair,
taking into account all aggravating and mitigating factors. Defendant states that she has
informed the United States Attorney's Office and the Probation Officer, either directly or through
her attorney, of all mitigating factors. Defendant will not oppose imposition of a sentence
incorporating the disposition provided for within this Agreement, nor argue for any other
sentence. If Defendant argues for any sentence other than the one to which she has agreed, she is
in breach of this Agreement. Defendant agrees that the remedy for this breach is that the United
States is relieved of its obligations under this Agreement, but Defendant may not withdraw her
guilty plea because of her breach.

20. This document and the supplemental plea agreement state the complete and only
Agreement between the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky and
defendant in this case, and are binding only on the parties to this Agreement, supersedes all prior
understandings, if any, whether written or oral, and cannot be modified other than in writing that
are signed by all parties or on the record in Court. No other promises or inducements have been
or will be made to defendant in connection with this case, nor have any predictions or threats

been made in connection with this plea.
AGREED:

MICHAEL A. BENNETT
United States Attorney

” ai bie 2ofrg

David Weiser Date’ ¢
Assistant United States Attorney

I have read this Agreement and carefully reviewed every part of it with my attorney. I
fully understand it and I voluntarily agree to it.

Meal, o_ B/D am
ead Ea Bauer Date

I am the defendant's counsel. I have carefully reviewed every part of this Agreement
with the defendant. To my knowledge my client's decision to enter into this Agreement is an

informed ard voluntary one.
V7. Ypjo~
= Date Z

William Butler
Counsel for Defendant

MAB:DW:1b:12012021

10

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.kywd.124235.12.0.pdf
Size
3,720,198 bytes
SHA-256
6155c1cf2d8c9bec65712f5ae294b8eb52c55c9b2a8a26b8e75a032d91cb5446
Our copy
gov.uscourts.kywd.124235.12.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top