Letter from Henry E. Mazurek to Judge Edward S. Kiel, August 11, 2025 — United States v. Spitzer (Dkt. 82, D.N.J.)

Summary

Letter dated August 11, 2025, from Henry E. Mazurek and Jason I. Ser of Meister Seelig & Fein PLLC, counsel for Arthur Spitzer, to Judge Edward S. Kiel in United States v. Spitzer, et. al., 24 Cr. 528 (ESK), in the District of New Jersey. At the September 3, 2024 arraignment the Court set release on a $250,000 secured appearance bond, with travel restricted to the District of New Jersey and, for attorney visits only, the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York; travel to the Eastern District of New York for medical treatment was later allowed. The letter asks for a temporary change so Spitzer can travel to Brooklyn on Wednesday, August 13, 2025, to attend a bar mitzvah, and says Spitzer will not communicate with anyone associated with the case who is present. Pretrial Services and the government have no objection.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Case 1:24-cr-00528-ESK          Document 82          Filed 08/11/25    Page 1 of 1 PageID: 298




                                                                                          Jason I. Ser
                                                                                               Partner
                                                                                Direct (646) 539-3712
                                                                                  Fax (212) 655-3535
                                                                                    jis@msf-law.com

                                        August 11, 2025
VIA ECF
The Honorable Edward S. Kiel
United States District Judge
District of New Jersey
Mitchell H. Cohen Building & U.S. Courthouse
4th & Cooper Streets, Room 1050
Camden, New Jersey 08101

       Re:     United States v. Spitzer, et. al., 24 Cr. 528 (ESK)

Dear Judge Kiel,

        We write on behalf of our client, Arthur Spitzer, to respectfully request that the Court
modify the conditions of release imposed in this case at the arraignment hearing on September 3,
2024. At that time, the Court ordered, among other conditions, release on a $250,000 secured
appearance bond with travel restricted to the District of New Jersey and, for purposes of attending
attorney visits only, the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York. The Court later modified
the travel conditions allowing Mr. Spitzer to travel to the Eastern District of New York as needed
for medical treatment. Mr. Spitzer seeks temporary modification of the travel conditions to allow
him to travel to Brooklyn, in the Eastern District of New York, on Wednesday, August 13, 2025,
to attend his nephew’s bar mitzvah. Mr. Spitzer agrees that he will not communicate with anyone
associated with the case if they are present.

       We contacted Pretrial Services Officer Todd Jones and Assistant United States Attorney
Daniel Friedman about the instant modification request. Pretrial Services and the government
have no objection.

       Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

                                        Respectfully Submitted,

                                             /s/ JIS
                                        Henry E. Mazurek
                                        Jason I. Ser
                                        Meister Seelig & Fein PLLC
                                        Attorneys for Arthur Spitzer

cc:    Counsel of record (via email)
       United States Pretrial Services (via email)

File and source

File

82.pdf

Size

559,263 bytes

SHA-256

93cad60234d618227c19762a0284c026b59007dec4726704a9e48c3fa19a094e

Our copy

82.pdf