Court filing
Order of Forfeiture — United States of America v. Anubor J. Bagbi (Case 1:23-cr-00045-AKB, Document 56)
Summary
The final order of forfeiture in United States v. Anubor J. Bagbi, Case No. 1:23-cr-00045-AKB-1, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, filed March 7, 2024 as Document 56, grants the United States' Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture (Dkt. 55). It incorporates the findings of the preliminary order of forfeiture (Dkt. 49) and forfeits the subject property to the United States, including approximately $11,784.41 in seized currency from a Unify Federal Credit Union account, $139 in cash, three phones and two unseized JP Morgan Chase accounts. It states that the forfeiture money judgment of $222,051.86 is final. Notice was published on www.forfeiture.gov and no claims were filed, and the order states that no claim of interest in the property shall exist in any other person or entity.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed March 7, 2024 in Anubor J. Bagbi; one of 4 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-03-07 |
Cite this document
“Order of Forfeiture — United States of America v. Anubor J. Bagbi (Case 1:23-cr-00045-AKB, Document 56).”
U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, No. 1:23-cr-00045, Doc. 56, filed 2024-03-07. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-anubor-j-bagbi/2024-03-07-final-order-of-forfeiture-dkt-56/
, SHA-256 7f780c848c98d25f14ab158beac713f2603f25eeebe9f60a1ca765593fb41a7b.Full text
Case 1:23-cr-00045-AKB Document 56 Filed 03/07/24 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. 1:23-cr-00045-AKB-1
Plaintiff,
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
vs.
ANUBOR J. BAGBI,
Defendant.
This matter comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Final Order of
Forfeiture. (Dkt. 55).
The Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, Final as to Defendant and Forfeiture
Money Judgment (“POF”) (Dkt. 49) of the Subject Property and found a sufficient nexus and
statutory authority, as described below. The Court incorporates its findings from the POF into this
Final Order of Forfeiture.
Subject Property:
a) Seized Property:
1. Approximately $11,784.41 in seized currency from Unify Federal Credit
Union Account No. 3629020 (seized in accordance with the warrant issued
in Case No. 1:23-mj-00099-DKG);
2. $139 in cash seized on December 15, 2022;
3. Blue iPhone with black Otterbox case seized on December 15, 2022;
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 1
Case 1:23-cr-00045-AKB Document 56 Filed 03/07/24 Page 2 of 3
4. Black Nokia phone seized on December 15, 2022;
5. Green iPhone with white case seized on December 15, 2022.
b) Unseized JP Morgan Chase Accounts: AMB Farms LLC account ending in 3310 and
LG Farms USA LLC account ending in 9259.
Money Judgment Previously Ordered
The POF included a forfeiture money judgment for $222,051.86. That forfeiture money
judgment is final, as explained in the POF.
Nexus and Factual Basis for Forfeiture
The Defendant pleaded guilty to counts three and six of the Indictment, a violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1344(I) and 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. (Plea Agreement and Plea Hearing Minutes Dkts. 34 and
37). Defendant admitted to possessing the Subject Property in connection with opening fraudulent
business accounts using information from stolen checks, which he then deposited into these
accounts and withdrew the proceeds. (Plea Agreement, Dkt. 34).
The Court sentenced the Defendant and entered Judgment. (Judgment, Dkt 52).
Statutory Authority
The Court’s forfeiture authority originates from 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. §
2461(c), which provide that, when imposing sentence on any person convicted of a violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1344, the Court, shall order the person to forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes
or is derived, directly or indirectly, from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense.
The Court’s Additional Findings
The Court FINDS that the record and pleadings reflect the following.
The United States caused notice of the above-referenced forfeiture order to be published
and sent in accordance with the requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(6)(A).
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 2
Case 1:23-cr-00045-AKB Document 56 Filed 03/07/24 Page 3 of 3
This included publication on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov). See
Criminal Rule 32.2(b)(6)(C) and Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and
Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.
No claims were filed.
The Court’s Orders
The Court therefore ORDERS the following.
The Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture is GRANTED.
The Court directs the United States Attorney General (or a designee) to seize all of the
forfeited properties described in this Order, not previously seized.
All right, title and interest to the Subject Property is hereby condemned, forfeited and
vested in the United States. No claim of interest in said property shall exist in any other person or
entity. Said property shall be disposed of according to law.
All parties herein shall bear their own costs and fees.
March 07, 2024
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 3File and source
- File
- 56.pdf
- Size
- 188,629 bytes
- SHA-256
- 7f780c848c98d25f14ab158beac713f2603f25eeebe9f60a1ca765593fb41a7b
- Our copy
- 56.pdf