Order of Forfeiture — United States v. David Antonetti

Record facts

U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · No. 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP · Doc. 53 · 2024-12-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order of forfeiture in United States of America v. David Antonetti, No. 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, entered in Tampa on December 12, 2024 as Doc. 53. The order grants the government's motion and finds that the defendant obtained $20,136 in proceeds from the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, for which the court states he was found guilty. Under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) and Rule 32.2(b)(2), it forfeits that amount to the United States, to become final as to the defendant at sentencing. Because the order states the proceeds were transferred to third parties and cannot be located, it allows the government to seek substitute assets under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p). The order is two pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
TAMPA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
 
 Case No. 8:24-cr-317-VMC-AEP 
 
 
DAVID ANTONETTI 
 
ORDER OF FORFEITURE 
 
The United States moves for an Order of Forfeiture in the amount of $20,136, 
representing the amount of proceeds the defendant obtained from his participation in 
the wire fraud scheme charged in Count One of the Indictment.  
Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds that the defendant 
obtained $20,136 in proceeds from the offense charged in Count One of the 
Indictment, for which the defendant was found guilty. 
The United States’ motion is GRANTED. Under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 
U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Rule 32.2(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 
the $20,136 in proceeds the defendant obtained is FORFEITED to the United States 
for disposition according to law. This order shall become a final order of forfeiture as 
to the defendant at sentencing. 
 
The proceeds of the offense were transferred to third parties, and the United 
States cannot locate the proceeds upon the exercise of due diligence. Accordingly, 
under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), the United States may seek, as a substitute asset in 
satisfaction of this judgment, forfeiture of any of the defendant’s property up to the 
Case 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP     Document 53     Filed 12/12/24     Page 1 of 2 PageID 122

2 
$20,136 order of forfeiture. The court retains jurisdiction to enter any order necessary 
to the forfeiture and disposition of any substitute asset.  
 
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on December 12, 2024. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP     Document 53     Filed 12/12/24     Page 2 of 2 PageID 123

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.429938.53.0.pdf

Size

78,765 bytes

SHA-256

3a30485aced177c88d7bfb17fcb8455f68400e5d18d5a591f56be785d7222c9a

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.429938.53.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)