Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) — United States v. Amber Rewis Bruey

Summary

An AO 247 Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in United States of America v. Amber Rewis Bruey, Case No. 2:21-cr-74-TPB-KCD, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, dated and filed 08/22/2025 as Document 193. On the defendant's motions (Docs. 176 and 185) for a reduction based on a retroactively lowered guideline range, the form order is marked denied for the reasons stated in probation's memorandum (Doc. 187) and defense counsel's notice (Doc. 192). It states that all provisions of the judgment dated 07/25/2022 remain in effect, lists Sonthonax B. SaintGermain, AFPD as defense counsel, and names Thomas P. Barber, U.S. District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 2:21-cr-00074-TPB-K_D Document193_ Filed 08/22/25 Page 1 of 1 PagelD 2193

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the
Middle District of Florida
United States of America )
: 2:21-cr-74-TPB-KCD
AMBER REWIS BRUEY ) Case No:
) USMNo: 63267-509
)
Date of Original Judgment: 07/25/2022 )
Date of Previous Amended Judgment: ) Sonthonax B. SaintGermain, AFPD
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant's Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of VI the defendant CJ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [| the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motions (Docs. 176 and 185) are:
[VIDENIED. LJ GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) Of months is reduced to

for the reasons stated in probation's memorandum (Doc. 187) and defense counsel's notice (Doc. 192).

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 07/25/2022 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: 08/22/2025 2 un 2 « A&_.

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Thomas P. Barber, U.S. District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.393556.193.0.pdf

Size

675,589 bytes

SHA-256

24f29617017468cba9918c42d6faefa2fd695f0caf1fa85a6b6aba8c7a0b1088

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.393556.193.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)