Court filing
Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Continue Sentencing Hearing — United States v. Aleta Necole Thomas
No. 4:21-cr-00239-GKF · Doc. 110 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 4:21-cr-00239-GKF Document 110 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 06/02/22 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 21-CR-239-GKF
ALETA NECOLE THOMAS,
Defendant.
Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion to Continue Sentencing Hearing
The Court should deny Aleta Thomas’s request for a continuance of her
Sentencing Hearing because Ms. Thomas has had ample time to file objections and
motions, gather letters from supporters, and present other information to the Court
related to her sentencing. More than six months ago, Ms. Thomas entered guilty
pleas in this case before the Honorable Judge Billy Roy Wilson. During her change
of plea hearing, the Court advised Ms. Thomas of her first sentencing date set May
25, 2022, at 1:15 p.m. before the Honorable Judge Wilson.
In anticipation of this first sentencing hearing date, on May 16, 2022, Ms.
Thomas filed an extensive Motion for Sentencing Variance of Defendant, Aleta
Necole Thomas, Doc. 97, along with 16 letters of support. Two days later, she filed
her Presentence Report Objections of Aleta Necole Thomas. Doc. 98. On May 20,
2022, the Court reset Ms. Thomas’s sentencing from May 25 to June 7, 2022.
Case 4:21-cr-00239-GKF Document 110 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 06/02/22 Page 2 of 3
Ms. Thomas has had ample opportunity to file motions, to gather letters of
support, and present information to the Court. Ms. Thomas’s request to continue her
sentencing hearing does not sufficiently describe or explain how this newly
discovered information will aid the Court in determining an appropriate sentence. It
is difficult to understand how Ms. Thomas has not yet gathered and provided all the
information that is “highly relevant to Ms. Thomas’s motion for variance[.]” and
“evidence that is related to Ms. Thomas’s PSR objections” given Ms. Thomas’s
extensive filings to date. Doc. 106 p. 1. Moreover, it is unclear why Ms. Thomas
needs to format this information to present it to the Court. Finally, in the event the
Court grants Ms. Thomas’s motion for continuance, the Government requests the
Court set deadlines for Ms. Thomas to file her additional filings and for the
Government to respond.
Respectfully submitted,
CLINTON J. JOHNSON
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
/s/ Kristin F. Harrington
Kristin F. Harrington, OBA No. 21185
Assistant United States Attorney
110 West Seventh Street, Suite 300
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119
(918) 382-2785
2
Case 4:21-cr-00239-GKF Document 110 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 06/02/22 Page 3 of 3
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on the day of June 2, 2022, I served the foregoing document
via electronic email, on the following:
Keith A. Ward
Keith@keithwardlaw.com
Counsel for Ms. Aleta Thomas
/s/ Kristin F. Harrington
Kristin F. Harrington
Assistant United States Attorney
3
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.oknd.57939.110.0.pdf
- Size
- 94,261 bytes
- SHA-256
- b6a2ed5400e3118c689f5fbdd44332e69ecb7fea4b82db5c2e10718c7098ff23
- Original
- PACER (login required)