Court filing
Stipulation Regarding Request for (1) Continuance of Trial Date and (2) Findings of Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act — United States v. McClain (Dkt. 44, C.D. Cal.)
Summary
A stipulation filed March 13, 2024 as Document 44 in United States v. Abdul-Malik McClain, No. 2:21-CR-580-MWF, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The parties state that the trial date has already been continued from February 15, 2022 to April 30, 2024, and the defendant asks for a further continuance to a proposed trial date of July 23, 2024. They ask that April 30, 2024 to July 23, 2024 be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. McClain is charged with ten counts of mail fraud and two counts of aggravated identity theft, and discovery runs to approximately 45,000 pages. Defense counsel lists other trials, depositions and hearings through August 19, 2024; the government does not object.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed March 13, 2024 in Abdul-Malik McClain; one of 11 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-03-13 |
Cite this document
“Stipulation Regarding Request for (1) Continuance of Trial Date and (2) Findings of Excludable Time Periods Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act — United States v. McClain (Dkt. 44, C.D. Cal.).”
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:21-cr-00580, Doc. 44, filed 2024-03-13. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/us-v-abdul-malik-mcclain/2024-03-13-stipulation-regarding-request-for-1-continuance-of-trial-dat-dkt-44/
, SHA-256 502e181e3234d102a9a62cbca3a507a46fd7020ac61cda9e040f3a978f02ef85.Full text
Case 2:21-cr-00580-MWF Document 44 Filed 03/13/24 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:156
1 E. MARTIN ESTRADA
United States Attorney
2 MACK E. JENKINS
Assistant United States Attorney
3 Chief, Criminal Division
KERRY L. QUINN (Cal. Bar No. 302954)
4 Assistant United States Attorney
Major Frauds Section
5 1100 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
6 Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-5423
7 Facsimile: (213) 894-6269
E-mail: Kerry.L.Quinn@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:21-CR-580-MWF
13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION REGARDING REQUEST FOR
(1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND
14 v. (2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE TIME
PERIODS PURSUANT TO SPEEDY TRIAL
15 ABDUL-MALIK MCCLAIN, ACT
16 Defendant. [PROPOSED] TRIAL DATE: 07-23-2024
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: 07-15-2024
17
18
19 Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel
20 of record, the United States Attorney for the Central District of
21 California and Assistant United States Attorney Kerry L. Quinn, and
22 defendant Abdul-Malik McClain (“defendant”), both individually and by
23 and through his counsel of record, Justin A. Palmer, Esq., hereby
24 stipulate as follows:
25 1. The Indictment in this case was filed on December 16, 2021,
26 and made public on December 20, 2021. Defendant first appeared
27 before a judicial officer of the court in which the charges in this
28 case were pending on December 20, 2021. The Speedy Trial Act, 18
Case 2:21-cr-00580-MWF Document 44 Filed 03/13/24 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:157
1 U.S.C. § 3161, originally required that the trial commence on or
2 before February 28, 2022.
3 2. On December 20, 2021, the Court set a trial date of
4 February 15, 2022.
5 3. Defendant is released on bond pending trial. The parties
6 estimate that the trial in this matter will last approximately 4-5
7 days.
8 4. The Court has previously continued the trial date in this
9 case from February 15, 2022, to April 30, 2024, and found the interim
10 period to be excluded in computing the time within which the trial
11 must commence, pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act.
12 5. Defendant is requesting a further continuance based upon
13 the following facts, which the parties believe demonstrate good cause
14 to support the appropriate findings under the Speedy Trial Act:
15 a. Defendant is charged with ten counts of mail fraud in
16 violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and two counts of aggravated identity
17 theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. The government has produced
18 discovery to the defense, including approximately 45,000 pages of
19 documents (some of which constitute recordings and other electronic
20 files, which are themselves voluminous, with the entire production
21 comprising approximately 11 Gigabytes of data). The discovery in the
22 case includes, among other documents and records: agent reports, bank
23 records, criminal history reports, search warrant documents, records
24 from the California Employment Development Department, and documents
25 from internet service providers (ISPs). The government will produce
26 additional discovery as necessary in accordance with its discovery
27 obligations.
28
2
Case 2:21-cr-00580-MWF Document 44 Filed 03/13/24 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:158
1 b. On December 20, 2022, defendant’s current counsel
2 substituted in as counsel of record. Defense counsel is still
3 reviewing the discovery and conducting his own investigation.
4 Defense counsel has other active matters preventing full preparation
5 of this matter on the current schedule, including the following:
6 i. March 10-11, 2024: Diaz v. Elizarraras,
7 2:21-cv-01944-CKD (E.D. Cal.), Depositions
8 ii. March 18-20, 2024: Pacheco v. Toor, et al.,
9 23LBCV00868 (Cal. Sup. Ct. Los Angeles County), Depositions
10 iii. March 25-29, 2024: Glazier v. County of Los
11 Angeles, et al., 2:20-cv-00924-SSS-RAO (C.D. Cal.), Jury Trial
12 iv. April 8, 2024: Duclos v. Elie, 22STCV33581,
13 (Cal. Sup. Ct. Los Angeles County), Hearing on Motion for Summary
14 Judgment
15 v. April 19-20, 2024: State Bar of California
16 Commission on Judicial Nominations and Evaluation Commitment;
17 vi. May 13, 2024: Robinson v. City of Burbank,
18 et al., 2:23-cv-01711-JAK-AS (C.D. Cal.), Post Mediation Status
19 Conference;
20 vii. June 2, 2024; Duclos v. Elie, 22STCV33581
21 (Cal. Sup. Ct. Los Angeles County), Jury Trial
22 viii. June 27, 2024: Saldana v. Passwaters, 2:18-
23 cv-00319-DJC-AC (E.D. Cal.), Pretrial conference
24 ix. August 8, 2024: Smith v. County of Los
25 Angeles, 5:21-cv-00290-MEMF-SHK (C.D. Cal.), Jury Trial
26 x. August 19, 2024: Saldana v. Passwaters,
27 2:18-cv-00319-DJC-AC (E.D. Cal.), Jury Trial
28
3
Case 2:21-cr-00580-MWF Document 44 Filed 03/13/24 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:159
1 c. In light of the foregoing, defense counsel also
2 represents that additional time is necessary to confer with
3 defendant, conduct and complete an independent investigation of the
4 case, conduct and complete additional legal research including for
5 potential pre-trial motions, review the discovery and potential
6 evidence in the case, and prepare for trial in the event that a
7 pretrial resolution does not occur. Defense counsel represents that
8 failure to grant the continuance would deny him reasonable time
9 necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise
10 of due diligence.
11 d. Defendant believes that failure to grant the
12 continuance will deny him continuity of counsel and adequate
13 representation.
14 e. The government does not object to the continuance.
15 f. The requested continuance is not based on congestion
16 of the Court’s calendar, lack of diligent preparation on the part of
17 the attorney for the government or the defense, or failure on the
18 part of the attorney for the government to obtain available
19 witnesses.
20 6. For purposes of computing the date under the Speedy Trial
21 Act by which defendant’s trial must commence, the parties agree that
22 the time period of April 30, 2024, to July 23, 2024, inclusive,
23 should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A),
24 (h)(7)(B)(i) and (h)(7)(B)(iv) because the delay results from a
25 continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request, without
26 government objection, on the basis of the Court’s finding that:
27 (i) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best
28 interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial; (ii) failure
4
Case 2:21-cr-00580-MWF Document 44 Filed 03/13/24 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:160
1 to grant the continuance would be likely to make a continuation of
2 the proceeding impossible, or result in a miscarriage of justice; and
3 iii failure to grant the continuance would unreasonably deny
4 defendant continuity of counsel and would deny defense counsel the
5 reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into
6 account the exercise of due diligence.
7 7. Nothing in this stipulation shall preclude a finding that
8 other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time
9 periods be excluded from the period within which trial must commence.
10 Moreover, the same provisions and/or other provisions of the Speedy
11 Trial Act may in the future authorize the exclusion of additional
12 time periods from the period within which trial must commence.
13 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14 Respectfully submitted,
15
E. MARTIN ESTRADA
16 United States Attorney
17
MACK E. JENKINS
18 Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
19
03/12/2024 __/s/ Kerry L. Quinn__________
20 DATE KERRY L. QUINN
Assistant United States Attorney
21 Attorneys for Plaintiff
22 United States of America
23 I, AUSA Kerry L. Quinn, as the filer of this document do hereby
attest that the other signatory listed, and on whose behalf the
24 filing is submitted, Justin Palmer, Esq., concurs in the filing’s
content and has authorized the filing.
25
26 03/12/2024 /s/ by email permission
DATE JUSTIN PALMER, ESQ.
27 Attorney for Defendant
ABDUL-MALIK MCCLAIN
28
5
Case 2:21-cr-00580-MWF Document 44 Filed 03/13/24 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:161
1 I am ABDUL-MALIK MCCLAIN’s attorney. I have carefully discussed
2 every part of this stipulation and the continuance of the trial date
3 with my client. I have fully informed my client of his Speedy Trial
4 rights. To my knowledge, my client understands those rights and
5 agrees to waive them. I believe that my client’s decision to give up
6 the right to be brought to trial earlier than July 23, 2024, is an
7 informed and voluntary one.
8
9 JUSTIN PALMER, ESQ. Date
Attorney for Defendant
10 ABDUL-MALIK MCCLAIN
11
12 I have read this stipulation and have carefully discussed it
13 with my attorney. I understand my Speedy Trial rights. I voluntarily
14 agree to the continuance of the trial date and give up my right to be
15 brought to trial earlier than July 23, 2024. I understand that I will
16 be ordered to appear in Courtroom 5A of the Federal Courthouse, 350
17 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California on July 23, 2024, at 8:30 am.
18
19 ABDUL-MALIK MCCLAIN Date
Defendant
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6File and source
- File
- 44.pdf
- Size
- 179,876 bytes
- SHA-256
- 502e181e3234d102a9a62cbca3a507a46fd7020ac61cda9e040f3a978f02ef85
- Our copy
- 44.pdf