Court filing
[Proposed] Order re Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendants — United States ex rel. Chawla v. Unified Care Services, LLC (Dkt. 44-1, C.D. Cal.)
Summary
A [proposed] order re joint stipulation of dismissal of defendants in United States ex rel. Ashwani Chawla v. Unified Care Services, LLC, et al., No. 2:21-cv-05935-GW-RAO, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed April 16, 2025 as Document 44-1 by Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney's Office counsel for the United States. It recites that the United States and the relator submitted a joint stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) and 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), subject to a Settlement Agreement. The proposed order would dismiss the case with prejudice as to the United States for the Covered Conduct, without prejudice as to other claims, and with prejudice as to the relator, with each party bearing its own fees and the court keeping jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. The signature line is undated.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed April 16, 2025 in United States ex rel. Chawla v. Unified Care Services, LLC; one of 3 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-04-16 |
Cite this document
“[Proposed] Order re Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendants — United States ex rel. Chawla v. Unified Care Services, LLC (Dkt. 44-1, C.D. Cal.).”
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:21-cv-05935, Doc. 44-1, filed 2025-04-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/united-states-ex-rel-chawla-v-unified-care-services-llc/2025-04-16-proposed-order-re-joint-stipulation-of-dismissal-of-defendan-dkt-44-1/
, SHA-256 35b6ba6327f41de88aab7ca6e5da3721a707a89d588d44030db154ddba112d6d.Full text
Case 2:21-cv-05935-GW-RAO Document 44-1 Filed 04/16/25 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#:276
YAAKOV M. ROTH
1 Acting Assistant Attorney General
BILAL A. ESSAYLI
2 United States Attorney
DAVID M. HARRIS, AUSA
3 Chief, Civil Division
JACK D. ROSS, AUSA (CBN 265883)
4 Chief, Civil Fraud Section
Room 7516, Federal Building
5 300 N. Los Angeles Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
6 Tel: (213) 894-7395
Fax: (213) 894-7819
7 Email: Jack.Ross@usdoj.gov
JAMIE ANN YAVELBERG
8 COLIN M. HUNTLEY
BENJAMIN C. WEI
9 Attorneys, Civil Division
United States Department of Justice
10 P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
11 T: 202.616.2875| F: 202.616.3085
Email: Benjamin.C.Wei@usdoj.gov
12 Attorneys for the United States of America
13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15 WESTERN DIVISION
16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex No. LACV 21-5935 GW (RAOx)
rel. ASHWANI CHAWLA,
17 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT
Plaintiffs, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
18 DEFENDANTS
v.
19 [FILED CONCURRENTLY: JOINT
UNIFIED CARE SERVICES, LLC, et STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
20 al., DEFENDANTS; CONSENT OF THE
UNITED STATES TO DISMISSAL]
21 Defendants.
22
23
24
25 WHEREAS, the United States of America (“United States”) and Relator have
26 submitted a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the
27
28
Case 2:21-cv-05935-GW-RAO Document 44-1 Filed 04/16/25 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#:277
1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), in accordance with and
2 subject to the Settlement Agreement, and with the consent of the United States.
3 THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
4 The dismissal shall be:
5 (1) with prejudice as to the United States as to all claims against Defendants
6 regarding the Covered Conduct described in Recital Paragraph F of the
7 Settlement Agreement;
8 (2) without prejudice as to the United States as to all other claims against
9 Defendants; and
10 (3) with prejudice as to the Relator as to all claims against Defendants.
11 Except as specifically provided in the Settlement Agreement, each party shall bear
12 its own fees and costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the
13 Settlement Agreement.
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16 Dated: ____________ _______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28File and source
- File
- 44-att1.pdf
- Size
- 141,934 bytes
- SHA-256
- 35b6ba6327f41de88aab7ca6e5da3721a707a89d588d44030db154ddba112d6d
- Our copy
- 44-att1.pdf