Order of Detention Pending Trial — Rodney Rosenstein — District of Arizona, Case Number CR-26-04213-001-TUC-RM (Document 22)

Summary

An order of detention pending trial for Rodney Rosenstein in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Case Number CR-26-04213-001-TUC-RM (EJM), Document 22, filed September 1, 2026, and dated the 31st day of August, 2026. The order states that a detention hearing took place in accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. §3142(f). The form checks findings that there is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense and a serious risk that the defendant will not appear and/or is a flight risk, with further explanation "as stated on the record". It orders the defendant detained and remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

           Case 4:26-cr-04213-RM-EJM        Document 22      Filed 09/01/26       Page 1 of 3
                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                  DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


        United States of America             Case Number: CR-26-04213-001-TUC-RM (EJM)
                    v.                       ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
           Rodney Rosenstein

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. §3142(f), a detention hearing has been held.
I conclude that the following facts require the detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.
                            Findings of Fact and Statement of Reasons
☐            (1)    Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. §3142(e)(3) (narcotics,
             firearm, other offenses): There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has
             committed an offense
             ☐      for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in
                    The Controlled Substances Acts, 21 U.S.C. §801-904; 21 U.S.C. §951-971; or
                    Chapter 705 of Title 46 (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508);
             ☐      under 18 U.S.C. §§924(c), 956(a) or 2332b;
             ☐      under §2332b(g)(5)(B) with a maximum term of 10 years or more in prison;
             ☐      under Chapter 77 of Title 18 (18 U.S.C. §§1581-1597) for which a maximum term
                    of 20 years or more in prison is prescribed; or
             ☐      an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242,
                    2244(a)(1), 2245, 2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1) - (a)(3), 2252A(a)(1) - (a)(4), 2260,
                    2421 - 2423, or 2425.
☐            (2)    The defendant has not rebutted the presumption established by finding (1) that no
             condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure .

ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS:
☐        (1)     Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. §3142(e)(2) (previous
         violator): The defendant is charged with an offense described in 18 U.S.C. §3142(f)(1),
         that is
                 ☐ a crime of violence as defined in 18 U.S.C.§3156(a)(4), a violation of 18 U.S.C.
                 §1591, or an offense listed in §2332b(g)(5)(B) with a maximum term of 10 years or
                 more in prison;
                 ☐ an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death;
                 ☐ an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is
                 prescribed in The Controlled Substances Acts, 21 U.S.C. §801-904; 21 U.S.C. §951-
                 971; or Chapter 705 of Title 46 (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508);
                 ☐ a felony that was committed after the defendant had been convicted of two or
                 more prior federal offenses described in 18 U.S.C. §3142(f)(1)(A)-(C), or
                 comparable state or local offenses; or
                 ☐ any felony that involves a minor victim or that involves the possession or use of
                 a firearm or destructive device as defined in 18 U.S.C. §921, or any other dangerous
                 weapon, or involves a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. §2250; and


                                                                      Order of Detention Pending Trial (DAZ-TUC-2023)
            Case 4:26-cr-04213-RM-EJM         Document 22      Filed 09/01/26        Page 2 of 3
 USA v.                                            Case Number: CR-26-04213-001-TUC-RM (EJM)
 Rodney Rosenstein
                                                                                                       Page 2 of 3

☐             (2)    The defendant has been convicted with an offense described in 18 U.S.C.
              §3142(f)(1) or has been convicted of a state or local offense that would have been a federal
              offense described in subsection (f)(1) if a circumstance giving rise to federal jurisdiction
              had existed (18 U.S.C. §3142(e)(2)(A)); and
☐             (3)    The offense described in finding (2) was committed while the defendant was on
              release pending trial for a federal, state or local offense (18 U.S.C. §3142(e)(2)(B)); and
☐             (4)    A period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction or
              release of the defendant from imprisonment for the offense described in finding (2)
              whichever is later. 18 U.S.C. §3142(e)(2)(C).
☐             (5)    Findings Nos. (1) (2) (3) and (4) establish a rebuttable presumption that no condition
              or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of (an)other person(s) and
              the community. I further find that the defendant has not rebutted this presumption.

OTHER FINDINGS:
☒        (6)    There is probable cause to believe that the defendant has committed an offense.
☒        (7)    There is a serious risk that the defendant will not appear and/or is a flight risk and
         that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant’s
         appearance.
☐        (8)    There is a serious risk that the defendant will endanger the safety of another person
         or the community and that no conditions or combination of conditions will reasonably
         assure the safety of others and the community.
☐        (9)     Defendant is a citizen of another country.
☐        (10) Defendant does not have sufficient ties to the community.
☐        (11) The reports from Pretrial Services Agency are adopted as the further findings of this
         Magistrate Judge.
☐        (12) The reports and recommendation from Pretrial Services Agency are adopted as the
         further findings of this Magistrate Judge.

☒             (13)   Other Reasons or Further Explanation: as stated on the record.


                        Further Written Statement of Reasons for Detention
I find that the credible testimony and information submitted at the hearing establishes by

☐      Clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is a danger to the community, that no condition
or combination of release condition will reasonably assure the safety of the community and require the
detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.

☒      A preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is a serious flight risk, that no condition or
combination of release conditions will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance and require the
detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.

                                                                         Order of Detention Pending Trial (DAZ-TUC-2023)
            Case 4:26-cr-04213-RM-EJM         Document 22     Filed 09/01/26        Page 3 of 3
 USA v.                                           Case Number: CR-26-04213-001-TUC-RM (EJM)
 Rodney Rosenstein
                                                                                                      Page 3 of 3


                                   Directions Regarding Detention
The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her designated representative
for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or
serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable
opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on
request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver
the defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court
proceeding.

IT IS ORDERED the defendant is detained and remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

       Dated this 31st day of August, 2026.




                                                                        Order of Detention Pending Trial (DAZ-TUC-2023)


File and source

File

22-order-of-detention.pdf

Size

156,716 bytes

SHA-256

7c05adca825b4256d9271719424bbd42abe39e10612731c599da81354c5ae7d7

Our copy

22-order-of-detention.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com