Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings PPP Attempt Conspiracy Legal Filings USCA Time Schedule Order as to Martin Kao, USCA No. 25-1454 — PPP Attempt Conspiracy Le…

Court filing

USCA Time Schedule Order as to Martin Kao, USCA No. 25-1454 — PPP Attempt Conspiracy Legal Filings (Dkt. 160)

No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEK · Doc. 160 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

         Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK      Document 160     Filed 03/07/25   Page 1 of 1 PageID.1367
                                         Office of the Clerk
                        United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
                                       Post Office Box 193939
                                San Francisco, California 94119-3939
                                            415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court



                                     TIME SCHEDULE ORDER


        Docket Number:           25-1454
        Originating Case Number: 1:21-cr-00061-LEK-1
        Case Title:              United States of America v. Kao



        Thursday, March 20, 2025
        Martin Kao                                            Appeal Transcript Order Due

        Monday, April 21, 2025
        Martin Kao                                            Appeal Transcript Due

        Thursday, May 29, 2025
        Martin Kao                                            Appeal Opening Brief Due

        Monday, June 30, 2025
        United States of America                              Appeal Answering Brief Due


       If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-
       designate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3. If there were no reported hearings,
       the transcript deadlines do not apply.
       The optional reply may be filed within 21 days of service of the answering brief. See
       Fed. R. App. P. 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
       Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order may result in
       automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.




                     Case: 25-1454, 03/07/2025, DktEntry: 2.1, Page 2 of 2


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.hid.154418.160.0.pdf
Size
795,647 bytes
SHA-256
2e348ace89e7b77de89132b49a3b6e87bc032e220174bd3714e00d8e9f5b0710
Our copy
gov.uscourts.hid.154418.160.0.pdf
Original
www.justice.gov
Back to top