Court filing
RESPONSE in Support by USA as to Martin Kao re 190 MOTION for Hearing… — PPP Attempt Conspiracy Legal Filings (Dkt. 193)
No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEK · Doc. 193 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
The government's response to movant PacMar Technologies LLC's renewed motion for restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A and § 3664 (ECF 190), in United States of America v. Martin Kao, Crim. No. 21-00061 LEK, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, filed March 26, 2026 as Document 193. The United States concurs in the arguments and request for restitution set out in PacMar's renewed motion. Relying on those reasons and the government's earlier submissions, it asks the court to order the defendant to pay restitution to PacMar as requested. The three-page response is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig S. Nolan and includes a certificate of service on counsel for the defendant and for PacMar.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK Document 193 Filed 03/26/26 Page 1 of 3 PageID.2442
KENNETH M. SORENSON
United States Attorney
District of Hawaii
CRAIG S. NOLAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Room 6100, PJKK Federal Building
300 Ala Moana Blvd.
Honolulu, Hawaii 96850
Telephone: (808) 541-2850
Facsimile: (808) 541-2958
Email: Craig.Nolan@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Crim. No. 21-00061 LEK
)
Plaintiff, ) GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE
) TO MOVANT PACMAR
v. ) TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S RENEWED
) MOTION FOR RESTITUTION
MARTIN KAO, ) PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3663A
) AND § 3664 (ECF 190)
Defendant. )
)
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO MOVANT
PACMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S RENEWED MOTION FOR
RESTITUTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3663A AND § 3664 (ECF 190)
The United States of America concurs in the arguments and request for
restitution set forth in PacMar Technologies LLC’s Renewed Motion for
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK Document 193 Filed 03/26/26 Page 2 of 3 PageID.2443
Restitution Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A and § 3664 (ECF 190). For the reasons
articulated therein and those found in the government’s earlier submissions and
arguments to the Court, the government respectfully requests that the Court order
Defendant Martin Kao to pay restitution to PacMar as requested in PacMar’s
Renewed Motion.
DATED: March 26, 2026, at Honolulu, Hawaii.
KENNETH M. SORENSON
United States Attorney
District of Hawaii
By /s/ Craig S. Nolan
CRAIG S. NOLAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
2
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK Document 193 Filed 03/26/26 Page 3 of 3 PageID.2444
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on the date noted below, a true and correct copy of the
foregoing was served on the following by the specified method of service.
By CM/ECF electronic filing system
Randall K. Hironaka, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant Marin Kao
Philip Miyoshi, Esq.
Attorney for Tiffany Lam
David M. Louie, Esq.
Jesse W. Schiel, Esq.
Attorneys for PacMar Technologies LLC
By email
Sara Nieling
United States Probation Officer
DATED: March 26, 2026, at Honolulu, Hawaii.
/s/ Craig S. Nolan
Craig S. Nolan
U.S. Attorney’s Office
District of Hawaii
3
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.hid.154417.193.0.pdf
- Size
- 129,899 bytes
- SHA-256
- 82aa7f06a151b0f8e9d4cdc5967418c0247b33f01c0a5cde41b0dfd08995cd0c
- Original
- PACER (login required)