Court filing
ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Dettmer, Ethan) (Filed on… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 44)
Summary
An ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel filed July 15, 2020 as Document 44 in James Cottle, et al. v. Plaid Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The form certifies that the undersigned has read the Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook, discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities, and considered whether the case might benefit from any of them. It carries the date 07/15/2020 beside Plaid Inc. as party and beside Ethan D. Dettmer as attorney, with /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer on the counsel line. Counsel further certifies a discussion of the selection of an ADR process with counsel for the other parties.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Dettmer, Ethan) (Filed on… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 44).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 44. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/plaid-privacy-cand-359040/undated-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-44-0-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-44-0/
, SHA-256 8049ada412258121a6d2b1a687bf7e6ae240e4ea2ce2fc7c901057321bba59ce.Full text
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 44 _ Filed 07/15/20 Page1of1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA James Cottle, et al. CASE No C 4:20-cv-03056-DMR y Plamtifi(s) ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL Plaid Inc. Defendant(s) Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has: 1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” (available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr). 2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and 3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options. Date:07/15/2020 Plaid Inc. Party Date:07/15/2020 Ethan D. Dettmer Attorney Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties: 1 intend to stipulate to an ADR process El prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management conference Date: 07/15/2020 /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer Attomey Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR Options.” Form ADR-Cert rev. 1-15-2019
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.359040.44.0.pdf
- Size
- 119,627 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8049ada412258121a6d2b1a687bf7e6ae240e4ea2ce2fc7c901057321bba59ce
- Original
- PACER (login required)