delivered stamped objection — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 162.1)

Summary

An Objection and Notice of Intention to Appear filed March 3, 2022 as Document 162-1 in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation, Master Docket No. 4:20-cv-03056 DMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division. Steven Helfand, writing in pro se, states membership in the class and an intention to appear at the fairness hearing. The objection states that the notice is misleading and violates due process, and that the notice implies, erroneously, that the judge overseeing the case is an Article III judge. The caption lists a date of May 12, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. by videoconference before the Hon. Donna M. Ryu.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document162-1 Filed 03/03/22 Page1of1

Steven Helfand, in pro se
410 SE 16" Court, Apartment 730

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Delivers (4
Steven.helfand1400@outlook.com . Date: ,

initials:
786.676.1018
. Not
Objector and absent class member
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION: Master Docket No.: 4:20-cv-03056 DMR
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS. OBJECTION AND NOTICE OF
INTENTION TO APPEAR

Date: May 12, 2022

Time: 1:00 p.m.

Ctrm: Videoconference

Judge: The Hon. Donna M. Ryu

CLASS MEMBERSHIP

| am a class member in the above referenced case. My notice ID is PLD1036874260. My
confirmation code is 72089AF62D. | submitted a claim on January 30, 2022, at 6:01:46 AM. My
contact information is listed in the caption. This is sufficient evidence of class membership. |
intend to appear at the fairness hearing.
OBJECTIONS

STRUCTURAL PROBLEM WITH NOTICE AND JURISDICTION

The Notice is misleading and violates due process. This implicates jurisdictional
concerns. See, Molski v. Gleich, 318 F.3d 937 (9" Cir. 2002). Here, the notice implies,
erroneously, that the judge overseeing this case is an Article III judge, when she is not. See,

Notice, § 26 [“Please check www.PlaidSettlement.com, or Judge Donna M. Ryu’s Calendar

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.162.1.pdf

Size

92,102 bytes

SHA-256

08995085e4b1e98222e1ba54ffaeb934521a71e5b258deabf606e7bef2dbefb4

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.162.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)