Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. Food and Drug Administration Letter re Waiving Redaction Challenges — PHMPT v. FDA

Court filing

Letter re Waiving Redaction Challenges — PHMPT v. FDA

Filed October 1, 2024 in Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency v. Food and Drug Administration; one of 30 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
Filed2024-10-01

U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · No. 4:21-cv-01058-P · Doc. 87 · 2024-10-01 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

VIA ECF 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
October 1, 2024 
Honorable Mark T. Pittman 
501 West 10th Street, Room 401 
Fort Worth, Texas 76102-3673 
 
 
Re: 
Public Health & Med. Pros. For Transparency v. Food and Drug Administration 
 
 
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Case No. 4:21-cv-01058-P 
 
 
 
Dear Judge Pittman: 
 
 
We write on behalf of the plaintiff, PHMPT, in the above-referenced action as a follow-up 
to our recent telephonic conference. As you are aware, the parties are set to begin briefing the 
adequacy of search issue on October 17, 2024, with briefing to be completed by December 5, 2024.  
 
 
Because FDA would not agree to Plaintiff’s proposal to bring this case to a resolution 
within a reasonable period of time, Plaintiff is willing to waive the right to challenge the redactions 
and withholdings in the production to date. This will allow the parties to brief, and the Court to 
enter an order concerning, the adequacy of search issue. The Court may then close the case, and 
the parties can brief attorneys’ fees and costs if no agreement is reached. 
 
 
We do note that if any individual member(s) of PHMPT wishes to challenge a redacted or 
withheld document from this production, that member may submit a new FOIA request with FDA 
on his or her behalf (as opposed to on behalf of PHMPT) and go through the normal administrative 
course to attempt to obtain the document without any redactions. Should the administrative process 
not provide the desired outcome, that member may then litigate to challenge the redactions or 
withholdings in a separate litigation from the instant litigation, and if we are counsel, we would 
seek to relate that case to the instant litigation.  
 
 
PHMPT’s hope is that waiving its right to challenge redactions will allow this litigation to 
continue more efficiently and to be resolved faster despite the non-cooperation of FDA.   
 
The undersigned has informed FDA of this plan. If there are any other issues the Court 
would like the parties to address prior to the briefing for adequacy of search is scheduled to begin, 
the parties welcome addressing those issues and respectfully request advanced notice of same. 
Thank you for your consideration. 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
/s/ Elizabeth A. Brehm 
Elizabeth A. Brehm 
745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 
New York, NY 10151 
(888) 747-4529 
ebrehm@sirillp.com 
Case 4:21-cv-01058-P   Document 87   Filed 10/01/24    Page 1 of 1   PageID 2354

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.txnd.353278.87.0.pdf
Size
150,034 bytes
SHA-256
5a58254cc32d1b992d1460fec3154e89c71b1415649b96a5b6aec9a6cf6e1d7b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.txnd.353278.87.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top