Docket — PayServices Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, No. 24-2355 (9th Cir.)

Summary

A CourtListener docket sheet for PayServices Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, No. 24-2355 (9th Cir.), listing the appeal as opened Apr 15, 2024 and appealed from Boise, Idaho. Entries include an opening brief by Appellant PayServices Bank on May 28, 2024, an answering brief by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on Jul 29, 2024, amicus briefs including one by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and a reply brief on Aug 15, 2024. A notice of oral argument sets Wednesday, December 4, 2024. Entries from 2026 include an April 14, 2026 order granting a motion to seal and a May 22, 2026 citation of supplemental authorities.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

PayServices Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

(24-2355)

Docket alerts are an advanced feature of CourtListener. Members can create unlimited docket alerts. If you are not a member, we allow five alerts and give a bonus of 10 alerts to anybody with the RECAP Extension installed.

You currently have alerts. To create additional alerts, please install the RECAP Extension or become a Member.

We can sometimes provide need-based exceptions to these rules. If you might need an exception, please let us know.

By clicking 🙏, you used 1 of your 5 daily prayers asking somebody to buy a document for you from PACER. Your prayer will now show up on our leaderboard of most-wanted PACER documents, and when the community buys it for you, we'll send you an email to let you know.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

June 5, 2026, 9 p.m.

Date Argued:
Dec. 4, 2024

PayServices Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 24-2355, (9th Cir.)

April 15, 2024

May 22, 2026

Fee Status:
Paid

Case Type Information:
Civil, Private

Originating Court Information

Appealed From:

Boise, Idaho

Oral Argument Recordings

PayServices Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Dec. 4, 2024

Items on this page are sourced from PACER and RECAP and may not be up to date. Learn more about our coverage.

Apr 15, 2024

CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:23-cv-00305-REP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-2355 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes.
Resources Available
For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for attorneys and pro se litigants) and review the Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/15/2024 03:12 PM]

Apr 15, 2024

SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 4/22/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/28/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/28/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/15/2024 03:15 PM]

Apr 18, 2024

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jade A. Craig for Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 04/17/2024 06:29 PM]

Apr 18, 2024

ADDED Counsel for Appellant Jade A. Craig [Entered: 04/18/2024 09:27 AM]

Apr 18, 2024

MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant PayServices Bank.

To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line.

Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 04/18/2024 03:52 PM]

Apr 23, 2024

MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference with counsel on the date and time indicated above. Date: 5/1/2024, Time: 2:00 PM Pacific Time. Each participant on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Also, please notify Circuit Mediator Jonathan Westen immediately by email (Jonathan_Westen@ca9.uscourts.gov ) if counsel has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all counsel on any such communications. All communications should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All discussions that take place in the context of the conference are confidential. See Cir. R. 33-1. For more detailed information about the assessment conference, confidentiality, the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see the attachment to this order and the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 04/23/2024 03:54 PM]

Apr 29, 2024

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan Youngwood for Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 04/29/2024 10:36 AM]

May 6, 2024

RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 05/06/2024 02:53 PM]

May 28, 2024

OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant PayServices Bank.--[COURT UPDATE: attached corrected PDF of brief.] [Entered: 05/28/2024 07:34 PM] [Edited: 05/29/2024 09:26 AM]

May 28, 2024

EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 05/28/2024 07:42 PM]

May 28, 2024

DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant PayServices Bank.--[duplicate entry, correct entry at DE 9] [Entered: 05/28/2024 07:58 PM] [Edited: 05/29/2024 09:26 AM]

May 29, 2024

ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant PayServices Bank is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 10 by Appellant PayServices Bank are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerk’s principal office. [Entered: 05/29/2024 09:32 AM]

Jun 4, 2024

Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 10 by Appellant PayServices Bank received. [Entered: 06/04/2024 04:40 PM]

Jun 4, 2024

Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant PayServices Bank received. [Entered: 06/04/2024 04:42 PM]

Jun 20, 2024

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Meredith Karp for Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 06/20/2024 12:03 PM]

Jun 20, 2024

ADDED Counsel for Appellee Meredith Karp [Entered: 06/20/2024 12:13 PM]

Jun 26, 2024

Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 06/26/2024 10:24 AM]

Jun 26, 2024

ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/29/2024. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/26/2024 01:22 PM]

Jul 29, 2024

ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 07/29/2024 08:40 PM]

Jul 29, 2024

EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 07/29/2024 08:44 PM]

Jul 31, 2024

ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 20 by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerk’s principal office. [Entered: 07/31/2024 11:02 AM]

Aug 5, 2024

AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Independent Community Bankers of America and Consumer Bankers Association. [Entered: 08/05/2024 08:31 AM]

Aug 5, 2024

ADDED Amici Curiae - Pending Independent Community Bankers of America, Consumer Bankers Association; Counsel for Amici Curiae - Pending: Jonathan S. Franklin. [Entered: 08/05/2024 12:07 PM]

Aug 6, 2024

AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. [Entered: 08/05/2024 06:15 PM]

Aug 6, 2024

Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 20 by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco received. [Entered: 08/06/2024 01:45 PM]

Aug 6, 2024

Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco received. [Entered: 08/06/2024 01:48 PM]

Aug 7, 2024

ADDED Amicus Curiae Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Counsel for Amicus Curiae Katherine Pomeroy [Entered: 08/07/2024 11:45 AM]

Aug 7, 2024

ORDER FILED. Amicus Brief submitted at DE 24 by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Amicus must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with green front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerk’s principal office. [Entered: 08/07/2024 11:48 AM]

Aug 8, 2024

RESPONSE to Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief (DE 22) filed by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 08/08/2024 08:03 PM]

Buy on PACER ($0.80)

Aug 9, 2024

Paper copies (6) of Amicus Brief submitted at DE 24 by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System received. [Entered: 08/09/2024 09:59 AM]

Aug 12, 2024

ORDER FILED. The motion of the Independent Community Bankers of America and the Consumer Bankers Association for leave to file an amicus curiae brief (Docket Entry No. 22) and any responses are referred for resolution to the panel that will consider the merits of the case.
Within 7 days after the date of this order, amicus curiae is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, with a green cover, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. The Form 18 certificate is available on the court’s website at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/.
The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. The address for regular U.S. mail is P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939. The address for overnight mail is 95 Seventh Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1526. [Entered: 08/12/2024 09:24 AM]

Aug 13, 2024

NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco.

Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for December 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully.

If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation.

You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [24-2355] [Entered: 08/13/2024 03:03 PM]

Aug 14, 2024

Paper copies (6) of Amicus Brief submitted at DE 22 by Independent Community Bankers of America and Consumer Bankers Association received. [Entered: 08/14/2024 12:14 PM]

Aug 15, 2024

REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 08/15/2024 09:06 PM]

Aug 15, 2024

REPLY to Response to Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief (DE 29) filed by Amicus Curiae - Pending Independent Community Bankers of America, Amicus Curiae - Pending Consumer Bankers Association. [Entered: 08/19/2024 10:36 AM]

Aug 15, 2024

RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Jade A. Craig. [Entered: 08/15/2024 09:25 PM]

Aug 16, 2024

RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Jonathan Youngwood. [Entered: 08/16/2024 06:59 PM]

Aug 19, 2024

ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 34 by Appellant PayServices Bank is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerk’s principal office. [Entered: 08/19/2024 09:46 AM]

Aug 26, 2024

Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 34 by Appellant PayServices Bank received. [Entered: 08/26/2024 02:24 PM]

Sep 22, 2024

NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 4, 2024 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA

View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here.

NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel.

Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so.

Be sure to review the GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing.

If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [24-2355] [Entered: 09/22/2024 06:49 AM]

Sep 30, 2024

TEXT CLERK ORDER. The motion for leave to file an amicus brief (DE 22), is granted. [Entered: 09/30/2024 11:31 AM]

Oct 2, 2024

CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 22 by Independent Community Bankers of America and Consumer Bankers Association is filed. No additional paper copies are rerquired. [Entered: 10/02/2024 10:11 AM]

Oct 15, 2024

ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Jonathan Youngwood for Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 12/4/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 10/15/2024 09:43 AM]

Nov 13, 2024

ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Jade A. Craig for Appellant PayServices Bank. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 12/4/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 11/13/2024 01:26 PM]

Dec 4, 2024

ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Timothy M. Tymkovich, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Patrick J. BUMATAY. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the court’s website at https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:12 AM]

Dec 19, 2024

ORDER FILED. Timothy M. Tymkovich, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Patrick J. BUMATAY
This matter is before the court sua sponte to direct supplemental briefing addressing the impact on this appeal of Idaho’s revocation of PayServices’s preliminary approval for a state bank charter. At oral argument held on Dec. 4, 2024, counsel for the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco mentioned that Idaho revoked PayServices’s preliminary approval for a bank charter. This appears true. See Cease and Desist Issued to PayServices, IDAHO – DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, https://www.finance.idaho.gov/pressrelease/cease-and-desist-issued-to-payservices/ (last visited Dec. 18, 2024). In full, the Idaho Department of Finance’s press release reads... No later than January 17, 2025, the parties shall submit simultaneous memorandum briefs addressing the following issues: 1. The status of PayServices’s Idaho state bank charter and any associated appellate proceedings. 2. Whether PayServices remains an “eligible depository institution” given Idaho’s revocation of its preliminary state bank charter. Aplt. Br. at 8. 3. If PayServices is no longer an “eligible depository institution,” whether the court should abate this case pending the outcome of PayServices’s appeal. Id. 4. Assuming Idaho upholds the revocation, why the court should not dismiss this case as moot. The parties’ memorandum briefs may be no longer than 10 double-spaced pages in 13- or 14- point Times New Roman font. The supplemental briefs need not comply with the content requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 28(a), but they should be organized in a manner that is helpful to the court. Hard copies need not be submitted. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT] [Entered: 12/19/2024 01:20 PM]

Jan 17, 2025

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 01/17/2025 08:37 PM]

Buy on PACER ($1.20)

Jan 17, 2025

EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 01/17/2025 08:41 PM]

Buy on PACER ($0.80)

Jan 17, 2025

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 01/17/2025 09:13 PM]

Buy on PACER ($1.20)

Jan 21, 2025

CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 47 and Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 48 by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/21/2025 09:21 AM]

Jan 21, 2025

CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 49 by Appellant PayServices Bank is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/21/2025 09:24 AM]

Jan 24, 2025

ORDER FILED. Timothy M. Tymkovich, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Patrick J. BUMATAY This matter is before the court sua sponte to keep the above-captioned case in abeyance pending the outcome of PayServices’ administrative appeal and order further production of documents.
This appeal is placed in abeyance pending the outcome of PayServices’ administrative appeal before the Idaho Department of Finance on February 19–20, 2025. The parties shall file a status report as to the status of the appeal by February 27, 2025 and every 30 days thereafter until the resolution of PayServices’ administrative appeal. Further, this court orders PayServices to file, within 14 days of the issuance of this order, the following documents related to its state proceedings: the August 3, 2022 letter from the Idaho Department of Finance granting PayServices’ preliminary charter; the October 16, 2023 letter from the Idaho Department of Finance granting PayServices an extension of their preliminary charter; the October 16, 2024 letter from the Idaho Department of Finance terminating PayServices’ preliminary charter; and, upon the resolution of PayServices’ administrative appeal, any explanation provided by the Idaho Department of Finance. [Entered: 01/24/2025 04:12 PM]

Feb 8, 2025

MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 02/08/2025 10:14 PM] [Edited: 02/12/2025 04:33 PM]

Feb 8, 2025

RESPONSE to Court Order (DE 52) UNDER SEAL filed by Appellant PayServices Bank.--[court entered filing of response submitted at DE 53] [Entered: 02/12/2025 04:36 PM]

Feb 14, 2025

TEXT CLERK ORDER. Motion to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing (DE 53) is granted. [Entered: 02/14/2025 08:55 AM]

Feb 27, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 02/27/2025 04:59 PM]

Mar 31, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 03/31/2025 11:47 AM]

Apr 28, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 04/28/2025 02:29 PM]

59

Jun 2, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 06/02/2025 01:34 PM]

Jul 2, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 07/02/2025 03:06 PM]

Jul 31, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 07/31/2025 02:16 PM]

62

Sep 2, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 09/02/2025 12:02 PM]

63

Oct 1, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 10/01/2025 03:08 PM]

64

Nov 3, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 11/03/2025 04:23 PM]

65

Nov 18, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Entered: 11/18/2025 05:15 PM]

66

Nov 20, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 11/20/2025 05:41 PM]

67

Nov 24, 2025

ORDER FILED. Timothy M. Tymkovich, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Patrick J. BUMATAY
In January 2025, the court held the above-captioned case “in abeyance pending the outcome of [Plaintiff-Appellant] PayServices’ administrative appeal.” We ordered PayServices to file, “upon the resolution of PayServices’ administrative appeal, any explanation provided by the Idaho Department of Finance.” PayServices filed a Notice Regarding Administrative Appeal on November 18, 2025, informing the court that “two independent Administrative Law Judges . . . have now concluded that the [Idaho Department of Finance]’s October 16, 2024 termination of PayServices’ conditional preliminary approval has been reversed.” PayServices references a September 8, 2025, order and a November 5, 2025, order. On November 20, 2025, Defendant-Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) filed a response to PayServices’ Notice, stating that “FRBSF does not have access to, and has not seen, the September 8, 2025 and November 5, 2025 orders referenced in PayServices’ November 18, 2025 Notice.” We order PayServices to file copies of the September 8 and November 5 orders, or to explain why it cannot do so, within 14 days. FRBSF will have 21 days thereafter to respond to PayServices’ November 18 filing after it has been given an opportunity to review the orders. [Entered: 11/24/2025 02:02 PM]

68

Dec 2, 2025

DEFECTIVE - STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 69.] [Entered: 12/02/2025 08:55 AM] [Edited: 12/02/2025 12:45 PM]

69

Dec 2, 2025

RESPONSE to [-] (DE [-]) filed by Appellant PayServices Bank. [Court entered filing to correct DE 68.] [Entered: 12/02/2025 12:42 PM]

70

Dec 3, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 12/03/2025 12:16 PM]

71

Dec 8, 2025

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 12/08/2025 07:04 PM]

72

Dec 8, 2025

DEFECTIVE - STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 73.] [Entered: 12/08/2025 07:26 PM] [Edited: 12/09/2025 02:27 PM]

73

Dec 8, 2025

REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 69) filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Court entered filing to correct DE 72.] [Entered: 12/09/2025 02:25 PM]

74

Jan 8, 2026

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 01/08/2026 10:10 AM]

75

Feb 9, 2026

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 02/09/2026 05:55 PM]

76

Mar 12, 2026

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 03/12/2026 03:26 PM]

77

Apr 2, 2026

MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant PayServices Bank.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached separate PDFs of motion and sealed documents as of 4/7/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Motion unsealed per DE 79] [Entered: 04/02/2026 08:44 PM] [Edited: 04/08/2026 12:08 PM]

78

Apr 2, 2026

RESPONSE to Court Order (DE 52) filed UNDER SEAL by Appellant PayServices Bank.--[Court entered filing, originally filed at DE 77]--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF (containing only sealed orders) attached as of 4/7/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 04/03/2026 03:21 PM] [Edited: 04/07/2026 02:17 PM]

79

Apr 8, 2026

ORDER FILED. Timothy M. Tymkovich, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Patrick J. BUMATAY
Appellant PayServices Bank’s motion to submit sealed documents (Dkt. 77) is GRANTED. The clerk will file publicly the motion to seal (Dkt. 77.1). The clerk will maintain under seal the response to court order (Dkt. 78). [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:03 PM]

80

Apr 8, 2026

DEFECTIVE --- NOTICE of Filing Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 81] [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:54 PM] [Edited: 04/10/2026 12:47 PM]

81

Apr 10, 2026

MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. -- [COURT UPDATE: Motion unsealed per DE 83] [Entered: 04/10/2026 12:27 PM] [Edited: 04/14/2026 03:16 PM]

82

Apr 10, 2026

REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 78) filed UNDER SEAL by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.--[Court entered filing, originally filed with motion at DE 81] [Entered: 04/10/2026 12:50 PM]

83

Apr 14, 2026

ORDER FILED. Timothy M. Tymkovich, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Patrick J. BUMATAY
Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco’s motion (Dkt. 81) to seal portions of its response to Appellant PayServices Bank’s motion to submit sealed documents is GRANTED. The clerk will file publicly the motion to seal (Dkt. 81.1). The clerk will maintain under seal Appellee’s reply to Appellant’s response to court order (Dkt. 81.2 and Dkt. 82). Appellee is ordered to file publicly a redacted copy of its response, as contemplated by its motion. [Entered: 04/14/2026 03:14 PM]

84

Apr 15, 2026

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 04/15/2026 12:27 PM]

85

Apr 20, 2026

DEFECTIVE --- SUPPLEMENT to Motion to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing (DE 81) filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 86] [Entered: 04/20/2026 12:39 PM] [Edited: 04/20/2026 01:51 PM]

86

Apr 20, 2026

RESPONSE to Court Order (DE 83) filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.--[Court entered filing to correct DE 85] [Entered: 04/20/2026 01:50 PM]

87

May 14, 2026

STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 05/14/2026 08:13 AM]

88

May 22, 2026

CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellee Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. [Entered: 05/22/2026 05:04 PM]

Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements.

Launched in 2010, the RECAP extension is a free tool for your browser that helps us collect the content you see on CourtListener. Once installed, anything you buy on PACER gets automatically added to the RECAP Archive and anything another RECAP user has bought is automatically free to you.

File and source

File

courtlistener-docket-68964877.html

Size

367,988 bytes

SHA-256

50f30dd63f8bc502d3085aabcd3d076f4e8d7595f7b825a611d551c2263a167f

Our copy

courtlistener-docket-68964877.html

Original

www.courtlistener.com