Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Pandemic Relief Dead Ends How Much Would $2,000 Checks Cost? — full saved HTML

Court filing

How Much Would $2,000 Checks Cost? — full saved HTML

Summary

A December 28, 2020 blog post from the COVID Money Tracker, an initiative of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, estimating the cost of raising recovery rebates from $600 to $2,000 per person after enactment of the Response & Relief Act. The post puts the additional cost at about $300 billion for President Trump's proposal, about $400 billion for the original House proposal covering taxpayers and children, and roughly $435 billion for a proposal that also covers adult dependents, on top of $166 billion of rebates in the relief bill. It notes that JCT has estimated the House-passed CASH ACT would cost $464 billion. The post also estimates the expanded rebates would add $200 to $300 billion of economic output, assuming a multiplier of 0.67x.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

How Much Would $2,000 Checks Cost?

Dec 28, 2020

Other Spending

With the enactment of the Response & Relief Act yesterday, policymakers in both parties have called for expanding recovery rebates from $600 per person to up to $2,000 per person. Depending on the design, we estimate this would cost between $300 and $435 billion on top of the $166 billion of rebates in the relief bill. JCT has estimated that the House-passed CASH ACT would cost $464 billion, about 7 percent higher than our $435 billion estimate.

We also estimate it will boost economic output by $200 to $300 billion in our central estimate and temporarily lift disposable income in the first few months of next year to as much as 25 percent above pre-COVID levels.

The Response & Relief Act includes recovery rebates of $600 per taxpayer and an additional $600 per child. President Trump has called for lifting the per taxpayer rebate to $2,000 and leaving the per child payment at $600 (so “a family of four would receive $5,200"). Meanwhile, House Democratic Leadership proposed on Thursday to increase the rebates to $2,000 for taxpayers and children. Today, the House is voting on a proposal to increase the rebates to $2,000 for taxpayers, children, and (previously uncovered) adult dependents; that bill would also retroactively award the CARES Act rebates for these adult dependents.

The additional cost of these proposals vary depending on the details. We estimate the President’s proposal to increase the adult rebates would cost about $300 billion, the original House proposal to increase the rebates to $2,000 for adults and children will cost about $400 billion, and today’s proposal to also include adult dependents will cost roughly $435 billion. Inclusive of the second-round rebates already enacted in the Response & Relief Act, that means the plans will have a total cost of roughly $465 billion, $565 billion, or $600 billion, respectively.

Proposal

Additional Cost

Total Cost

Increase rebate from $600 to $2,000 per taxpayer

$300 billion

$465 billion

Increase rebate from $600 to $2,000 per taxpayer and child

$400 billion

$565 billion

Increase rebate to $2,000 per taxpayer, child, and adult dependent

$435 billion

$600 billion

The additional rebates cost more than simply multiplying the $166 billion cost of the original $600 proposal because more higher-income households become eligible if the amount increases. Under the enacted proposal, a family of 5 would get a $3,000 check at $150,000 of income, phasing down to $0 by $210,000 of income. If the amount increases to $2,000 per person and the phaseout rate is unchanged (as under the House bill), a family of 5 would get $10,000 at $150,000 of income, $5,000 at $250,000 of income, phasing down to $0 only above $350,000 of income.

These rebates will boost income substantially. We recently estimated the COVID relief bill would temporarily boost personal disposable income to as much as 13 percent above pre-COVID levels in the first quarter of next year. Assuming no further economic boost, enactment of these rebates would further boost disposable income to between 20 and 23 percent above pre-COVID levels. Incorporating the additional effects on output, income could be 25 percent higher or more.

The rebates will also boost economic output and growth, though the effect on economic output in the first quarter of next year is likely to be far more muted than the income effect. Because the economy would also be close to its potential in light of social distancing thanks to the Response & Relief bill, it is likely that further stimulus would have limited additional near-term effects. Instead, we expect people would save a large share of their rebates in the near-term (they could also cause a modest boost in inflation and thus erode their value – though we would expect this effect to be small).

Even if people saved much of the rebates in the first quarter of next year, however, they would likely spend the money in the spring and summer as other fiscal support wore off and the combination of warm weather and rising immunity reduced the need for social distancing. Recently, we estimated rebates would have an economic multiplier of between 0.6 and 1.0. Because of the timing of these payments relatively to other stimulus and social distancing, we expect the multiplier to be toward the lower end of that range.

Assuming a multiplier of 0.67x, the rebate expansion would produce between $200 and $300 billion of additional economic output, on top of the $615 billion we estimate would be produced by the Response & Relief bill. As a result, total COVID relief would be sufficient to close the majority of the output gap over the next three years, including a large majority over the next two years.

Note: JCT has estimated that the proposal being voted on Monday by the House of Representatives would cost $464 billion, about 7 percent higher than our $435 billion estimate. Thhis which would not materially change our GDP or income estimates.

This blog post is a product of the COVID Money Tracker, an initiative of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget focused on identifying and tracking the disbursement of the trillions being poured into the economy to combat the crisis through legislative, administrative, and Federal Reserve actions.

Tags

COVID Money Tracker

COVID Pandemic

Domestic Spending

Economic Recovery Measures

Taxes

Trending

Jun 17, 2026

Blog

Budgets & Projections

GAO Calls for ‘Urgent and Sustained Action’ on National Debt

In its new report, “ The Nation’s Fiscal Health,” the Government Accountability Office (GAO) projects the national debt will rise to 251 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2056 under a...

Read more

Jun 16, 2026

Papers

Health Care

Intergovernmental Transfers (IGTs) Can Inflate Federal Medicaid Matching Funds

The Medicaid program provides health insurance to roughly 70 million lower-income Americans and is jointly financed by states and the federal government. 1 The federal government covers about 65% of...

Read more

Jun 15, 2026

Blog

Health Care

Social Security

Maya MacGuineas: Social Security and Medicare are unsustainable. Kansas, Missouri need action

Maya MacGuineas is president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. She recently wrote an opinion piece for the Kansas City Star, an excerpt of which is below. More than 70 million...

Read more

What's Next

Image

Jun 2, 2026

Papers

Other Spending

Appropriations 101

Read more

Image

Jun 11, 2026

Blog

Other Spending

Appropriations Watch: FY 2027

Read more

Image

May 27, 2026

Blog

Other Spending

Defense Funding Put in Context

Read more

File and source

File
REPORT_CRFB_CASH-ACT-COST-ESTIMATE_2020-12-28_FULL.html
Size
44,516 bytes
SHA-256
74542f14c9d6d2f60090e8f59592424e17a73386d7dd71cd934edc4d8ea00d51
Our copy
REPORT_CRFB_CASH-ACT-COST-ESTIMATE_2020-12-28_FULL.html
Original
www.crfb.org
Back to top