Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC D.E. 91: Womply's Response to Navarros' Motion to Dismiss (Sept. 14, 2023) — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)

Court filing

D.E. 91: Womply's Response to Navarros' Motion to Dismiss (Sept. 14, 2023) — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)

Filed September 14, 2023 in Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC; one of 111 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Filed2023-09-14

U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico · No. 3:23-cv-01034-GMM · Doc. 91 · 2023-09-14 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS PR 
LLC, BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS 
LLC, BERNARDO NAVARRO and 
CLAUDIA NAVARRO, 
 
Defendants. 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
 
Civil Action No. 23-01034 
 
 
 
 
  
 
PLAINTIFF WOMPLY’S RESPONSE TO THE NAVARROS’ JOINT MOTION FOR 
JOINDER TO BENWORTH’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS 
Plaintiff Oto Analytics, LLC (f/k/a Oto Analytics, Inc. d/b/a Womply) (“Womply”) 
respectfully submits this response to Defendants Bernardo Navarro and Claudia Navarro’s 
(together, the “Navarros”) joint Motion for Joinder (“Joinder Motion”; ECF No. 90) to 
Defendants Benworth Capital Partners PR LLC (“Benworth PR”) and Benworth Capital Partners 
LLC’s (“Benworth FL”; together with Benworth PR, “Benworth”; together with the Navarros, 
“Defendants”) motions to dismiss (“Motions to Dismiss”; ECF Nos. 34–35, 61). 
The Navarros’ Joinder Motion should be denied for the same reasons as Benworth’s 
Motions to Dismiss.  (ECF No. 49.)  Contrary to the Navarros’ assertions, Womply’s claims do 
not “only ripen after (and if) Womply obtains a favorable arbitration award against Benworth FL.”  
(Joinder Motion at 4 (emphasis in original).)  Under First Circuit precedent, where, as here, “[t]he 
plaintiff’s underlying civil claims are actively being litigated” and the defendant “fraudulently 
concealed millions of dollars” that “rendered [it] insolvent,” “the plaintiff’s fraudulent conveyance 
claims” are “ripe for adjudication.”  Foisie v. Worcester Polytechnic Inst., 967 F.3d 27, 35–36 (1st 
Cir. 2020).  Moreover, both federal and Puerto Rico law permit prejudgment attachment.  See Fed. 
Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM     Document 91     Filed 09/14/23     Page 1 of 4

 
- 2 - 
R. Civ. P. 64(b); P.R. Code of Civ. P. R. 56.1 (P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 32A, § 56.1).  Prejudgment 
attachment would serve no purpose if claims seeking such relief were not ripe until a final 
determination, which would deprive litigants of any remedy should a party move or hide assets, 
like Defendants did here. 
The Navarros’ assertion that “Womply’s claims are premised on the determination of 
Benworth FL’s indebtedness to Womply” in “the ongoing Arbitration Proceeding” (Joint Motion 
at 5) is wrong as a matter of fact and law.  Womply alleges in detail that Defendants have deprived 
Womply of nearly $200 million and, on a motion to dismiss, Womply’s allegations must be 
“accepted as true.”  Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 663 (2009). 
There is no need to “stay the instant proceedings until an award is entered in the Arbitration 
Proceedings.”  (Joinder Motion at 5.)  In any event, Womply consents to a short stay until the 
Arbitrator issues an interim award, which will moot Defendants’ motions. 
Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM     Document 91     Filed 09/14/23     Page 2 of 4

 
- 3 - 
Dated: September 14, 2023 
Of Counsel: 
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 
By: /s/ Alexander L. Cheney 
Alexander L. Cheney (admitted pro hac vice) 
One Front Street  
San Francisco, CA 94111 
(415) 858-7400 
acheney@willkie.com 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
slombardi@willkie.com 
Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20006 
(202) 303-1000 
jlevy@willkie.com 
Respectfully submitted, 
By: /s/ Alejandro J. Cepeda Diaz 
 
McConnell Valdés LLC 
270 Muñoz Rivera Ave. 
Hato Rey PR 00918 
Tel: (787) 250-5637 
Email: ajc@mcvpr.com 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oto Analytics, LLC  
 
 
 
Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM     Document 91     Filed 09/14/23     Page 3 of 4

 
- 4 - 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
The undersigned certifies that on September 14, 2023, the foregoing document was filed 
with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which sent notices to all parties receiving notifications 
through the CM/ECF system. 
Dated: September 14, 2023   
 
 
By: /s/ Alejandro J. Cepeda Diaz 
Attorney for Plaintiff Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
 
 
Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM     Document 91     Filed 09/14/23     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.prd.175040.91.0.pdf
Size
126,250 bytes
SHA-256
19f33a6ead8cd0f53e483deca03d7664f7f3748593b6b13fe293571224d522dc
Our copy
gov.uscourts.prd.175040.91.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top