Court filing
Senator Marco Rubio Letter to SBA Administrator on PPP Agent Fee Caps — Exhibit 6 to OTO Analytics Complaint (Aug. 26, 2021) — Oto Analytics v. Benworth
Summary
Exhibit 6, filed January 24, 2023 as Document 1-6 in Case No. 3:23-cv-01034-GMM, Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, is a letter dated August 26, 2021 from U.S. Senator Marco Rubio to SBA Administrator Isabella Guzman. The letter asks the SBA to clarify its guidance on agent fees for Paycheck Protection Program loans of less than $50,000. It states that the January 14, 2021 interim final rule capped agent fees at one percent for loans of $350,000 or less, 0.5 percent for loans between $350,000 and $2 million, and 0.25 percent for loans of $2 million or greater. It says the rule makes no distinction for loans of not more than $50,000, although Congress increased lender processing fees for those loans. The letter asks for the clarification in writing or through new rulemaking.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed August 26, 2021 in Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC; one of 111 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | Exhibit 6 to OTO Analytics Complaint, Case No. 3:23-cv-01034-GMM |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-08-26 |
Cite this document
“Senator Marco Rubio Letter to SBA Administrator on PPP Agent Fee Caps — Exhibit 6 to OTO Analytics Complaint (Aug. 26, 2021) — Oto Analytics v. Benworth.”
Exhibit 6 to OTO Analytics Complaint, Case No. 3:23-cv-01034-GMM, No. 3:23-cv-01034-GMM, Doc. 1-6, filed 2021-08-26. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/oto-analytics-v-benworth/2021-08-26-rubio-sba-letter-ex6/
, SHA-256 c9345eb79f3bb31790280334810c050c08350d582660ea77bd365f13c04a3bee.Full text
EXHIBIT 6
Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM Document 1-6 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 3
August 26, 2021
The Honorable Isabella Guzman
Administrator
U.S. Small Business Administration
409 3rd Street SW
Washington, D.C. 20416
Dear Administrator Guzman:
I write to request the clarification of guidance issued by the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) related to agent fees for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans. I have
heard from several Florida lenders that the existing guidance is overly ambiguous in its treatment
of fees for PPP loans of less than $50,000. This ambiguity has created confusion and costly
uncertainty between lenders and loan agents, many of whom have provided vital services to
sustain local communities, employers, and workers throughout the pandemic.
On December 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2021, which included the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues
Act. This legislation extended and authorized a second draw of loans from the PPP, a forgivable
loan program that I authored and has provided more than 11 million emergency loans worth
nearly $800 billion to struggling small businesses and nonprofits across the country. As part of
this PPP reauthorization, Congress recognized the need to prioritize the smallest businesses for
relief, and accordingly, increased lenders’ compensation significantly for processing PPP loans
of not more than $50,000.
Though Congress made specific changes to lender processing fees for these small-dollar
loans, SBA guidance with respect to agent fees for these loans has remained the same. On
January 14, 2021, the SBA and U.S. Department of Treasury issued an interim final rule
providing guidelines for implementation of the newly amended PPP.1 The rule established caps
on agent fee collections from lenders, set at one percent for loans of $350,000 or less, 0.5 percent
for loans between $350,000 and $2 million, and 0.25 percent for loans of $2 million or greater.
Unlike the lender fees enacted by Congress, the rule does not make any distinction for
loans of not more than $50,000. This potential ambiguity has created confusion between lenders
and loan agents in my state, and should be remedied by a clarification from the SBA regarding
how such loans should be treated. I ask that you provide this clarification in writing, or through
new rulemaking.
1 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-14/pdf/2021-00451.pdf
Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM Document 1-6 Filed 01/24/23 Page 2 of 3
Thank you in advance for your prompt reply.
Sincerely,
Marco Rubio
U.S. Senator
Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM Document 1-6 Filed 01/24/23 Page 3 of 3File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.prd.175040.1.6.pdf
- Size
- 432,378 bytes
- SHA-256
- c9345eb79f3bb31790280334810c050c08350d582660ea77bd365f13c04a3bee
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.prd.175040.1.6.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)