Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Onisko Scholz v. Lendistry

Case docket

Onisko Scholz v. Lendistry

Onisko Scholz v. Lendistry — 2 documents in the archive, dated June 24, 2025.

Case facts

Docket numberNo. 2:24-cv-10314 — main docket
Filings2 public filings
Filed2025-06-24
Original PDFs1 of 2

Case summary

Onisko and Scholz, LLP, Paul Scholz and Cindy Schoelen sued B.S.D. Capital, Inc., doing business as Lendistry, in the Los Angeles County Superior Court on October 28, 2024, bringing sixteen claims under California law on behalf of a putative class and alleging that Lendistry accessed class members' bank accounts without consent to data mine them. Lendistry removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:24-cv-10314, on November 27, 2024. The page carries the order of June 24, 2025, Entry 47, in which Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong granted the plaintiffs' request for judicial notice and motion to remand, found that Lendistry had not met its burden to establish the diversity required for removal, sent the case back to the Los Angeles County Superior Court and denied Lendistry's motion to dismiss as moot, and a CourtListener docket listing. The listing records the removal, the motion to remand of December 6, 2024, the motion to dismiss of January 3, 2025 and, on October 27, 2025, an order granting in part the plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and awarding $26,520. The hosted docket listing shows that fee order as the latest entry.

Docket

2 documents in docket-entry order; attachments follow their entry. Gaps name the entries we do not have.

No. 2:24-cv-10314

  1. Order Granting Motion to Remand — Onisko and Scholz, LLP v. B.S.D. Capital, Inc. (C.D. Cal., June 24, 2025)Entry 47

Documents without an entry number

  1. undatedDocket — Onisko and Scholz, LLP v. B.S.D. Capital, Inc.

Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.

Back to top