Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Natasha Collins v. Small Business Administration (SBA) Restaurant Revitalization Fund — E.D. Pa., No. 22-4104 Order on Motion to Dismiss — Collins v. SBA (RRF) (E.D. Pa.)

Court filing

Order on Motion to Dismiss — Collins v. SBA (RRF) (E.D. Pa.)

Summary

Natasha Collins filed no response to the Small Business Administration's motion to dismiss her amended complaint, and on January 10, 2024 an order signed by John R. Padova granted it and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. The order in case 22-4104, brought against the agency's Restaurant Revitalization Fund, directed the Clerk to close the case and rests on the reasons in an accompanying memorandum.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed January 10, 2024 in Natasha Collins v. SBA; one of 3 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Filed2024-01-10

Cite this document

“Order on Motion to Dismiss — Collins v. SBA (RRF) (E.D. Pa.).” U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 2:22-cv-04104-JP, Doc. 18, filed 2024-01-10. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/natasha-collins-v-sba/2024-01-10-order-on-mtd/, SHA-256 058dc1652fba7b7158081938920cd4371d1bc8dc2e9568584a847fea86ecbd5f.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 
 
NATASHA COLLINS 
: 
 
CIVIL ACTION 
 
: 
 
v. 
: 
 
 
: 
 
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 
(SBA) RESTAURANT 
REVITALIZATION FUND 
: 
: 
: 
 
 
 
NO. 22-4104  
 
ORDER 
 
 
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants’ “Motion 
to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint” (Docket No. 16), to which Plaintiff has failed to file 
a response, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED for the reasons stated in 
the accompanying Memorandum.  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint 
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  The Clerk shall close this case.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ John R. Padova 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
____________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
John R. Padova, J. 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:22-cv-04104-JP   Document 18   Filed 01/11/24   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
collins_sba_rrf__docket-65424116__doc-18__id-383035035__Memorandum_and_or_Opinion_Order.pdf
Size
78,806 bytes
SHA-256
058dc1652fba7b7158081938920cd4371d1bc8dc2e9568584a847fea86ecbd5f
Our copy
collins_sba_rrf__docket-65424116__doc-18__id-383035035__Memorandum_and_or_Opinion_Order.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top