Court filing
Hearing Transcript (February 27, 2023) — In re KServicing
Filed March 1, 2023 in Kservicing Bankruptcy; one of 140 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-03-01 |
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware · No. 22-10951 · Doc. 598 · 2023-03-01 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN RE:
. Chapter 11
. Case No. 22-10951 (CTG)
KABBAGE, INC., d/b/a
. (Jointly Administered)
KSERVICING, et al.,
.
. Courtroom No. 7
. 824 Market Street
Debtors. . Wilmington, Delaware 19801
.
. Monday, February 27, 2023
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10:02 a.m.
TRANSCRIPT OF ZOOM HEARING
BEFORE THE HONORABLE CRAIG T. GOLDBLATT
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
APPEARANCES:
For the Debtors:
Zachary I. Shapiro, Esquire
RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, PA
One Rodney Square
920 North King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
-and-
Chase A. Bentley, Esquire
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
Audio Operator: Theresa Mistretta, ECRO
Transcription Company: Reliable
The Nemours Building
1007 N. Orange Street, Suite 110
Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Telephone: (302)654-8080
Email: gmatthews@reliable-co.com
Proceedings recorded by electronic sound recording,
transcript produced by transcription service.
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 1 of 9
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
INDEX
MOTIONS:
PAGE
Agenda
Item 3: Motion of The Juneau Group, LLC for Allowance 3
of Administrative Expense Claim Pursuant to 11
U.S.C. 503(b)(9)
[Docket No. 345 – filed December 6, 2022]
Court's Ruling:
DECLARATIONS:
PAGE
1) Declaration of Thora Thoroddsen 6
Declaration of Transcriptionist
9
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 2 of 9
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(Proceedings commenced at 10:02 a.m.)
THE COURT: Good morning. We are on the record
in, In re Kabbage, which is Case Number 22-10951.
Counsel can proceed.
MR. SHAPIRO: Good morning, Your Honor. For the
record, Zach Shapiro of Richards, Layton & Finger, on behalf
of the debtors, with my colleagues at Weil, Chase Bentley,
Natasha Hwangpo, and Richard Slack.
We have one matter on the agenda today. It was
actually a motion that was not filed by us. We did file an
objection. I don't believe the Movant -- the Movant is on?
UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Yes.
MR. SHAPIRO: So, with that, we did file an
objection, Your Honor, but we are not the Movant, so I will
turn the podium over, the virtual podium over to the Movant
to let them proceed.
THE COURT: Thank you very much, Mr. Shapiro. I
appreciate it.
So, Mr. Juneau, are you on the line?
(No verbal response)
THE COURT: Have we muted the phone,
Ms. Barksdale?
THE CLERK: I can unmute this to see if this is
him.
THE COURT: Okay.
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 3 of 9
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
(Pause)
THE COURT: Mr. Juneau, if you're on the line, if
you could unmute your phone and enter your appearance, that
would be very helpful.
(Pause)
THE COURT: All right. While it appears that at
the Movant has not dialed in, I'm happy to hear from the
debtor on how they'd propose to proceed under the
circumstances.
MR. BENTLEY: Thank you, Your Honor. For the
record, Chase Bentley, Weil Gotshal, on behalf of the
debtors.
Your Honor, given that the Movant has not shown up
on the proceeding today to present his motion, I think the
debtors are comfortable resting on the papers unless Your
Honor has any questions.
THE COURT: I do not. I've reviewed the papers.
Look, I'm satisfied on its face the claim does not
assert a claim with respect to goods that would be subject to
administrative priority, so I've got no trouble based on the
papers concluding that it's not an allowed administrative
claim.
With respect to the -- so, the debtor objected to
the administrative claim. Did the debtor also move to
disallow the claim in its entirety?
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 4 of 9
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MR. BENTLEY: Your Honor, we moved to reclassify
the claim.
THE COURT: As a general unsecured claim?
MR. BENTLEY: As a general unsecured claim.
THE COURT: Okay. So, I'm satisfied, without,
obviously, without prejudice --
MR. BENTLEY: Thank you, Your Honor.
THE COURT: -- to your addressing its allowance.
So, I'm happy, under the circumstances, I think it's
appropriate, based on the pleadings and having given the
Movant the opportunity to be heard to demonstrate the claim
is entitled to administrative priority and the claim having
failed to appear, I'm happy to issue a brief order that would
provide for the claim to be reclassified as a general
unsecured claim, without prejudice, to anyone's right to, you
know, take further action with respect to allowance of the
claim.
MR. BENTLEY: Thank you, Your Honor. And just for
the record, I think you should have seen that we filed a
declaration attached to our objection. If you think it's
necessary, we're happy to enter that on the record as direct
testimony.
THE COURT: I take it you're moving that
declaration into evidence?
MR. BENTLEY: Only if necessary, Your Honor. If
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 5 of 9
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
you're comfortable ruling without it, then I think that
we're, likewise, okay not entering it.
THE COURT: I think for -- I'm not sure it's
necessary, but I think for the completeness of the record, it
would make sense for you to make that motion.
MR. BENTLEY: Absolutely. Given that, Your Honor,
we'd like to move to admit as the direct testimony of Thora
Thoroddsen, the declaration filed at Docket 547-1.
THE COURT: Is there any objection to the
admission of that declaration?
(No verbal response)
THE COURT: Okay. Seeing none, the declaration
will be admitted.
(Thoroddsen Declaration received in evidence)
THE COURT: Is there any party that seeks to
cross-examine the declarant?
(No verbal response)
THE COURT: Okay. Seeing none, the declaration is
admitted and we can take it from there.
MR. BENTLEY: Thank you, Your Honor.
Nothing from the debtors at this point.
THE COURT: Okay. Sorry to bring everyone here
for what seems to be a rather anticlimactic hearing.
Is there any further way in which the Court can be
of assistance to the parties, either who are in person or on
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 6 of 9
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
the line?
MR. BENTLEY: I think Mr. Shapiro has one thing to
add.
THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Shapiro?
MR. SHAPIRO: I just wanted to clarify one thing.
You're going to enter your own order? Is that what the Court
would propose?
THE COURT: Yeah, I'm going to. Under the
circumstances, I think it's appropriate for me --
MR. SHAPIRO: Okay.
THE COURT: -- to issue a brief order -- I expect
to get it out today -- that sets forth the reasons in light
of the record as it exists.
MR. SHAPIRO: Understood. Just one point of
clarification. Mr. Juneau did file, I guess you call them
identical claims. One was this motion that was docketed as a
motion. Another was a claim 184, which was the same exact
motion. It was just docketed as a claim.
That claim has been re-classed, and so I don't
know that it's necessary to re-class this motion as well. I
think I --
THE COURT: Obviously, because you think we're
then going to have duplicate claims. You're going to run a
process for dealing with duplicate claims, right?
MR. SHAPIRO: Right. But I think as -- I mean, if
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 7 of 9
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
we were to submit an order, I'll just tell you what it would
say. It would just say the motion is denied. I don't think
it --
THE COURT: The motion for the allowance of the
administrative claim?
MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah, I don't think it needs to
address re-classification.
THE COURT: I think it is the -- so, you don't
have a motion that is on today? You don't have a motion to
disallow? You're just here as opposing a motion for the
allowance of an administrative claim?
MR. SHAPIRO: Correct.
THE COURT: Okay. I think you're right about
that.
MR. SHAPIRO: Okay.
THE COURT: I think the order will just provide
for the denial of a motion.
MR. SHAPIRO: Thank you, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Thank you.
Any other way in which the Court can be of
assistance to any of the parties?
MR. SHAPIRO: Nothing for today.
THE COURT: Well, with thanks to all of the
parties for this, we're adjourned. Thank you.
(Proceedings concluded at 10:09 a.m.)
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 8 of 9
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the foregoing is a correct
transcript from the electronic sound recording of the
proceedings in the above-entitled matter to the best of my
knowledge and ability.
/s/ William J. Garling February 28, 2023
William J. Garling, CET-543
Certified Court Transcriptionist
For Reliable
Case 22-10951-CTG Doc 598 Filed 03/01/23 Page 9 of 9File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.deb.188293.598.0.pdf
- Size
- 225,679 bytes
- SHA-256
- e1c1cebb17e581a944b21169d2c36a209cdafd76ed0d56ca46291a0912909aec
- Original
- archive.org