Final Judgment — Dismissal as Moot — Klaassen v. Indiana University (N.D. Ind.)

Summary

A Judgment in a Civil Action (form AO 450) in Ryan Klaassen, et al. v. The Trustees of Indiana University, Civil Action No. 1:21cv238, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, dated February 22, 2022 and filed as Document 56 in case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC. The marked box states that, in accordance with the Court of Appeals' order and instructions, the case is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The form records that the action was decided by Judge Damon R. Leichty. The plaintiffs named in the caption include Ryan Klaassen, Jaime Carini, Ashlee Morris, Seth Crowder, Macey Policka, Margaret Roth and Natalie Sperazza, and the judgment is entered over the signature of a deputy clerk.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

AO 450 (Rev. 01/09)   Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Northern District of Indiana
RYAN KLAASSEN; 
JAIME CARINI; 
D.J.B. next friend Daniel G Baumgartner;
ASHLEE MORRIS; 
SETH CROWDER;
MACEY POLICKA;
MARGARET ROTH; 
NATALIE SPERAZZA
Plaintiff(s)
  
v.
Civil Action No.
1:21cv238 
THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY
 
Defendant(s)
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
9 the plaintiff                                                                                                                                     
recover from the defendant                                                                             the amount of                             
          dollars $                   , which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of                     % plus post-
judgment interest at the rate of                % along with costs.
9  the plaintiff recover nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and the defendant                         
recover costs from the plaintiff                                        .
X Other: In accordance with the Court of Appeals’ order and instructions, this case is DISMISSED AS
MOOT. 
This action was (check one):
9tried to a jury with Judge                                                                       presiding, and the jury has
rendered a verdict.
9 tried by Judge                                                                         without a jury and the above decision was
reached.
X decided by Judge Damon R. Leichty.
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 56   filed 02/22/22   page 1 of 2

DATE: February 22, 2022                          
GARY T. BELL, CLERK OF COURT
by s/ D. Kirkwood                                                  
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 56   filed 02/22/22   page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.innd.107499.56.0.pdf

Size

116,405 bytes

SHA-256

e3b44c06fce6375c63e3c84eaab5c7f05e8da1cb65f6c8d92358300f07c534ee

Our copy

gov.uscourts.innd.107499.56.0.pdf

Original

archive.org