Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Informed Consent Action Network v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Complaint — ICAN v. HHS

Court filing

Complaint — ICAN v. HHS

Filed May 8, 2024 in Informed Consent Action Network v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the only filing from this case in the archive.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Filed2024-05-08

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia · No. 1:24-cv-01348-PLF · Doc. 1 · 2024-05-08 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK, 
2025 Guadalupe Street, Suite 260 
Austin, Texas 78705
 
Plaintiff,
-against-
Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-1348
 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 
HUMAN SERVICES, 
200 Independence Avenue SW 
Washington, DC 20201
 
Defendant. 
 
COMPLAINT 
Plaintiff Informed Consent Action Network (“ICAN” or “Plaintiff”) brings this action 
against defendant United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to compel 
compliance with the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”). As grounds therefor, 
Plaintiff alleges as follows: 
JURISDICTION AND VENUE 
1. 
The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) and 
28 U.S.C. § 1331.  
2. 
Venue is proper in this district pursuant 5 U.S.C. § 522(a)(4)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 
1331. 
PARTIES 
3. 
Plaintiff ICAN is a not-for-profit organization formed and existing under the laws 
of the state of Texas with its principal office located at 2025 Guadalupe Street, Suite 260, Austin, 
Texas 78705. Plaintiff is in good standing with the Texas Secretary of State. 
Case 1:24-cv-01348-PLF   Document 1   Filed 05/08/24   Page 1 of 5

2 
4. 
Defendant HHS is an agency within the Executive Branch of the United States 
Government. HHS is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(f) and has possession, 
custody, and control of records to which Plaintiff seeks access. 
STATEMENT OF FACTS 
5. 
On February 23, 2024, Plaintiff sent a FOIA request to HHS seeking copies of the 
following records: 
All communications sent or received by Xavier Becerra from 
February 1, 2023 through the date of the search that contain the 
terms (“Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices” AND/OR 
ACIP) AND (vacanc*, nominat*, applica*, appoint*, AND/OR 
decision).  
 
* = Boolean search 
 
(Exhibit 1.) 
 
6. 
Defendant HHS acknowledged Plaintiff’s FOIA request on February 26, 2024 and 
the request was assigned 2024-00605-FOIA-OS. (Exhibit 2.) 
7. 
On April 10, 2024, Plaintiff requested an update on the status of the request. 
(Exhibit 3.) 
8. 
On April 11, 2024, HHS advised it would take an additional 18 months to process 
the request despite having completed the search for records. (Exhibit 4.) 
9. 
As of the date of this Complaint, Defendant has failed to: (i) determine whether to 
comply with the request; (ii) notify Plaintiff of any such determination or the reasons therefor; or 
(iii) produce the requested records or otherwise demonstrate that the requested records are exempt 
from production.  
Case 1:24-cv-01348-PLF   Document 1   Filed 05/08/24   Page 2 of 5

3 
COUNT I 
FAILURE TO MAKE DETERMINATION BY REQUIRED DEADLINE 
(VIOLATION OF FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552) 
10. 
Plaintiff realleges the previous paragraphs as if fully stated herein.  
11. 
Defendant is in violation of FOIA.  
12. 
Defendant was required to make a final determination on Plaintiff’s request no later 
than twenty (20) business days from acknowledgement of the request. Because Defendant failed 
to make a final determination on Plaintiff’s request within the time limits set by FOIA, Plaintiff is 
deemed to have exhausted its administrative appeal remedies. 
13. 
Plaintiff is being irreparably harmed by reason of Defendant’s violation of FOIA, 
and Plaintiff will continue to be irreparably harmed unless Defendant is compelled to comply with 
the law. 
14. 
Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. 
COUNT II 
IMPROPER WITHHOLDING OF INFORMATION AND DATA 
(VIOLATION OF FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552) 
 
15. 
Plaintiff realleges the previous paragraphs as if fully stated herein. 
16. 
Defendant HHS failed to establish that it adequately applied an exemption to the 
withheld information and data. 
17. 
Defendant is in violation of FOIA. 
COUNT III 
ENTITLEMENT TO WAIVER OF SEARCH FEES 
 
18. 
Plaintiff realleges the previous paragraphs as if fully stated herein. 
19. 
Defendant is in violation of FOIA. 
Case 1:24-cv-01348-PLF   Document 1   Filed 05/08/24   Page 3 of 5

4 
20. 
Plaintiff sought a waiver of fees. Defendant failed, within 20 days, to produce the 
requested records and otherwise failed to comply with the statutory requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 
522 within the time limits set forth therein. 
21. 
Plaintiff is entitled to a waiver of fees pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(viii). 
REQUESTED RELIEF 
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court:  
a. 
Declare that Defendant’s current and continued delay in processing Plaintiff’s 
FOIA Request is unlawful under FOIA;  
b. 
Order Defendant to conduct searches for any and all records responsive to 
Plaintiff’s FOIA request and demonstrate that it employed search methods reasonably likely to 
lead to the discovery of records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request; 
c. 
Order Defendant to produce, by a date certain, any and all non-exempt records 
responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request and a Vaughn index of any responsive records withheld 
under any claimed exemption;  
d. 
Enjoin Defendant from continuing to withhold any and all non-exempt records 
responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request;  
e. 
Maintain jurisdiction over this action until Defendant complies with FOIA and all 
orders of this Court; 
f. 
Grant Plaintiff an award of attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs reasonably 
incurred in this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E);  
g. 
Grant Plaintiff a fee waiver pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(viii); and 
 
 
 
Case 1:24-cv-01348-PLF   Document 1   Filed 05/08/24   Page 4 of 5

5 
h. 
Grant Plaintiff such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. 
 
Dated: May 8, 2024  
 
 
 
SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP 
 
 /s/ Allison R. Lucas  
 
Allison R. Lucas, DC Bar No. MI0105 
220 West Congress Street 
2nd Floor 
Detroit, MI 48226 
Tel: (240) 732-6737 
alucas@sirillp.com  
 
Elizabeth A. Brehm, DC Bar No. NY0532 
745 Fifth Ave 
Suite 500 
New York, New York 10151 
Tel: (240) 732-6737 
ebrehm@sirillp.com 
Case 1:24-cv-01348-PLF   Document 1   Filed 05/08/24   Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.dcd.268317.1.0.pdf
Size
370,275 bytes
SHA-256
3d0a803952f755a817ab7d849bf55699c3e35cb5ec96fc2da81379c8d1086398
Our copy
gov.uscourts.dcd.268317.1.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top