Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Harvest Sbf Edmo Cluster Indictment — United States v. Velma Taper and Tiara West — United States v. Kenneth C. Sparks III et al. (E.D. Mo., 2024-09-03, 2)

Court filing

Indictment — United States v. Velma Taper and Tiara West — United States v. Kenneth C. Sparks III et al. (E.D. Mo., 2024-09-03, 2)

Filed September 3, 2024 in United States v. Kenneth C. Sparks III et al.; one of 5 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Southeastern Division
Filed2024-09-03

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Southeastern Division · No. 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ · Doc. 2 · 2024-09-03 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION 
F\LED 
SEP O 3 2024 
LI S DISTRICT COURT 
EASTE.RN DISTRICT OF MO 
CAPE GIRARDEAU 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
Plaintiff, 
1:24CR129SNLJ-ACL 
vs. 
Case No. 
VELMA TAPER, 
TIARA WEST, 
Title 18, U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1014. 
Title 18, U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1343. 
Forfeiture allegations. 
Defendants. 
INDICTMENT 
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: 
At all times material to this Indictment, unless otherwise specified below: 
1. Velma Taper, a defendant herein, was a resident of Caruthersville, Pemiscot County 
Missouri, within the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri. 
2. Tiara West, a defendant herein, was a legal resident of the state of Texas. 
3. Neither Velma Taper, nor Tiara West owned or operated a business registered 
or incorporated within the State of Missouri which was in operation on February 15, 2020. 
The Paycheck Protection Program 
4. The United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") is an executive-branch 
agency of the United States govenunent that provides support to entrepreneurs and small 
businesses. The mission of the SBA is to maintain and strengthen the nation's economy by 
enabling the establishment and viability of small businesses and by assisting in economic 
recovery after disasters. 
1 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 12

5. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act, Pub. L. No. 
116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020), is a federal law that was enacted in or around March 2020 to 
provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans suffering the economic 
impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided for in the CARES Act 
was the authorization of forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other 
expenses through the Paycheck Protection Progran1 ("PPP"). The purpose of loans issued under 
the PPP was to enable small businesses suffering from the economic downturn to continue to pay 
salary, wages and to provide benefits, such as health insurance coverage, to their employees. 
6. 
To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to submit a PPP loan 
application, signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application 
required the business to acknowledge the program rules and make ce1iain affirmative 
ce1iifications to obtain the PPP loan. ln the PPP loan application (SBA Form 2483), the small 
business (through its authorized representative) was required to certify: (a) that the small 
business was in operation on February 15, 2020; and (b) the average monthly payroll expenses; 
and ( c) the nun1ber of employees. These certifications were used to calculate the amount of 
money the small business was eligible to receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying 
for PPP loans were required to submit documentation supp01iing their payroll expenses. 
7. A PPP loan application was then processed by a paiiicipating lender. If a PPP loai1 
application was approved, the paiticipating lender funded the loan using its own monies, which 
were then guaranteed by the SBA. Generally, in the event that the borrower defaulted on a PPP 
loan, the SBA would purchase the borrower's debt from the lending financial institution and 
2 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 2 of 9 PageID #: 13

assume the responsibility for paying back the loan. 
8. PPP loan funds were required to be used on ce1iain pennissible expenses, 
including payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent, and utilities for the business. In the PPP loan 
application (SBA Form 2483), the bonower must certify that "[a]ll SBA loan proceeds will be 
used only for business-related purposes as specified in the loan application and consistent with 
the Paycheck Protection Program Rule." In that same application, the borrower must also ce1iify 
that "[t]he funds will be used to retain workers and maintain payroll or make mortgage interest 
payments, lease payments, and utility payments, as specified under the Paycheck Protection 
Program Rule." 
9. Under the applicable PPP rules and guidance, the interest and principal on the 
PPP loan was eligible for forgiveness if the business spent the loan proceeds on these authorized 
expense items within a designated period of time and used a certain portion of the loan toward 
payroll expenses. 
10. Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC. (Harvest), a financial institution headquaiiered in 
Laguna Hills, California, was a paiiicipating lender and issued PPP loans guai·anteed by the 
SBA. Hai·vest processed applications for PPP loans that were submitted through an internet-
based web portal, which affected interstate commerce. 
The Scheme to Defraud 
COUNTI 
False Statement (18 U.S.C. § 1014) 
11. Paragraphs 1-10 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 
12. 
On or about April 19, 2021, in the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of 
3 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 3 of 9 PageID #: 14

Missouri and elsewhere, the defendants, Velma Taper and Tiara West, each aided and abetted by 
each other, knowingly made a false statement to Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, a financial 
institution, for the purpose of influencing the action of Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, 
upon an application for a SBA backed PPP loan, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 
Section 1014 and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2, and punishable under Title 18, United 
States Code, Section 1014. 
COUNT II 
False Statement (18 U.S.C. § 1014) 
13. 
Paragraphs 1-10 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 
14. On or about May 20, 2021, in the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri 
and elsewhere, the defendants, Velma Taper and Tiara West, each aided and abetted by each other, 
knowingly made a false statement to Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, a financial institution, 
for the purpose of influencing the action of Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, upon an 
application for a SBA backed PPP loan, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 
and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2, and punishable under Title 18, United States Code, 
Section 1014. 
Manner and Means 
(Counts I & II) 
15. It was a part of the scheme that, on or about April 19, 2021 , Velma Taper and Tiara West, 
each aided and abetted by the other, submitted and caused to be submitted a fraudulent PPP loan 
application on behalf of Velma Taper. Velma Taper and Tiara West, each aided and abetted by the 
other, filed a second draw PPP loan application on or about May 20, 2021, and each application 
4 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 4 of 9 PageID #: 15

falsely stated: 
a) That Velma Taper was the owner/ operator of a small business that was in operation in 
Missouri on February 15, 2020. 
b) That any funds received by way of a PPP loan would be spent on permissible expenses, 
such as payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent and utilities for the business which she 
claimed. 
16. 
Further, Velma Taper, aided and abetted by Tiara West knowingly submitted and caused 
to be submitted certain documents in support of each of the fraudulent PPP loan applications, 
including a materially false and fraudulent Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Schedule C (Form 
1040) Profit or Loss From Business form (Schedule C) for 2019 which falsely represented a gross 
income of $135,000, and expenses for; 
a) $2,215.00 for advertising, 
b) $3,472 for contract labor, 
c) $1 ,000 for legal and professional services, 
d) $1,500 for office expenses, 
e) $4,500 for supplies, 
f) $2,579.00 for travel, 
g) $24,560 for wages. 
When in truth and fact, there was no such business on either April 19, 2021 or May 20, 
2021, and Velma Taper had not obtained the gross income listed, nor incurred the expenses 
claimed, and Velma Taper did not spend the proceeds of the loan in a manner consistent with the 
rules of the program. 
COUNT III 
Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) 
1 7. 
Paragraphs 1-10 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 
5 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 5 of 9 PageID #: 16

18. 
On or about April 19, 2021, in the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri 
and elsewhere, the defendants, Velma Taper and Tiara West, each aided and abetted by the other, 
voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to obtain money by means of 
material false representations, namely the submission of a fraudulent PPP loan application, with 
the intent to defraud, and the defendants used, or caused to be used an interstate wire 
communication, that is the electronic submission of a fraudulent loan application via the internet, 
for the purpose of obtaining an electronic deposit of funds into a bank account of Velma Taper, in 
furtherance of the scheme, and the scheme affected Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, a 
financial institution, in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 1343 and Title 18, United 
States Code, Section 2, and punishable under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. 
COUNTIV 
Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) 
19. 
Paragraphs 1-10 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 
20. 
On or about May 20, 2021, in the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri 
and elsewhere, the defendants, Velma Taper and Tiara West, each aided and abetted by the other, 
voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to obtain money by means of 
material false representations, namely the submission of a fraudulent PPP loan application, with 
the intent to defraud, and the defendants used, or caused to be used an interstate wire 
communication, that is the electronic submission of a fraudulent loan application via the internet, 
for the purpose of obtaining an electronic deposit of funds into a bank account of Velma Taper, in 
furtherance of the scheme, and the scheme affected Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC, a 
6 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 6 of 9 PageID #: 17

financial institution, in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 1343 and Title 18, United 
States Code, Section 2, and punishable under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. 
Manner and Means 
(Counts III & IV) 
21. 
It was a part of the scheme that, on or about April 19, 2021, Velma Taper, aided and abetted 
by Tiara West submitted and caused to be submitted a fraudulent PPP loan application on behalf 
of Velma Taper. A second draw PPP Loan application was filed on or about May 20, 2021, and 
each application falsely stated: 
a) That Velma Taper was the owner / operator of a small business that was in operation in 
Missouri on February 15, 2020. 
b) That any funds received by way of a PPP loan would be spent on permissible expenses, 
such as payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent and utilities for the business which she 
claimed. 
22. Further, Velma Taper and Tiara West, each aided and abetted by the other, submitted and 
caused to be submitted certain documents in support of each of the two fraudulent PPP loan 
applications, including a materially false and fraudulent Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Schedule 
C (Form 1040) Profit or Loss From Business form (Schedule C) for 2019 which falsely represented 
a gross income of $135,000, and expenses for; 
a) $2,215.00 for advertising, 
b) $3,472 for contract labor, 
c) $1 ,000 for legal and professional services, 
d) $1 ,500 for office expenses, 
e) $4,500 for supplies, 
f) $2,579.00 for travel, 
7 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 7 of 9 PageID #: 18

g) $24,560 for wages. 
When in truth and fact, there was no such business on either April 19, 2021, or May 20, 
2021, and Velma Taper had not obtained the gross income listed, nor incurred the expenses 
claimed and Velma Taper did not spend the proceeds of the loan in a manner consistent with the 
rules of the program. 
23. As a result of the materially false and fraudulent application for a PPP loan, the lender did 
electronically transfer $20,833.00 on two occasions to a bank account of Velma Taper, for a total 
of $41,666.00 in PPP loan proceeds. 
Forfeiture Allegations 
The Grand Jury fi.uiher finds by probable cause that: 
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A) and (a)(3)(F), upon 
conviction of an offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 and/or 
Section 1343, as set forth in the Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States of 
America any prope1iy constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as 
a result of such violation. Subject to forfeiture is a sum of money equal to the total value of the 
property, real or personal, constituting or derived from any proceeds traceable to such violation, 
which is at least $41 ,666.00. 
If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant: 
a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; 
b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; 
c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the comi; 
8 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 8 of 9 PageID #: 19

' . 
d. has been substantially diminished in value; or 
e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without 
difficulty, 
the United States of America will be entitled to the forfeitme of substitute property 
pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p). 
SAYLER A. FLEMING 
United States Attorney 
Tim J. Willis, # 62428MO 
Assistant United States Attorney 
A TRUE BILL 
Foreperson 
9 
Case: 1:24-cr-00129-SNLJ     Doc. #:  2     Filed: 09/03/24     Page: 9 of 9 PageID #: 20

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.moed.214483.2.0_Taper-Velma-indictment.pdf
Size
168,091 bytes
SHA-256
3b51ef97bdea9dd97dacc0c4c2acb7e71a942b23610bdacffef6c973149548ae
Our copy
gov.uscourts.moed.214483.2.0_Taper-Velma-indictment.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top