Case docket
Harborview Capital Partners, LLC v. Cross River Bank — D.N.J.
Harborview Capital Partners, LLC v. Cross River Bank — D.N.J. — 15 documents in the archive, dated August 11, 2021 to June 12, 2026.
Profile: Cross River Bank
Also collected in: Recap Pull 2026 06 12
Case facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (7 filings); U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey (3 filings) |
|---|---|
| Docket numbers | No. 2:21-cv-15146 — main docket · CourtListener docket 479907 No. 2:21-cv-15146 (no document in the archive is numbered on it) — other docket filed with this case No. 2:21-cv-15146 (no document in the archive is numbered on it) — other docket filed with this case |
| Filings | 15 public filings |
| Filed | 2021-08-11 – 2026-06-12 |
| Original PDFs | 15 of 15 |
| Profiles | Cross River Bank, Gilles Gade |
Case summary
Harborview Capital Partners, LLC v. Cross River Bank, No. 2:21-cv-15146 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, was filed August 11, 2021 by a Delaware limited liability company against the New Jersey banking corporation where it held accounts. The complaint seeks $1,375,000.00 in each of its counts, the amount of wire transfer funds it says Cross River improperly processed, and pleads violations of N.J.S.A. 12A:4A-201, 12A:4A-202 and 12A:4A-203 along with further counts. The court granted Cross River's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on April 26, 2022, without prejudice to a motion to amend, and denied reconsideration on November 14, 2022. A magistrate judge granted leave to file a second amended complaint on October 24, 2025, and that complaint was filed October 30, 2025.
Case at a glance
| Parties | Plaintiff Harborview Capital Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; defendant Cross River Bank, a New Jersey banking corporation with its principal place of business in Teaneck, New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Court and docket | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 2:21-cv-15146; the caption appears as KM-ESK on the early filings and as EP-SDA from 2025 |
| Program | Not named in the filings on this page. The claims concern wire transfers from the plaintiff's deposit accounts, not a pandemic relief program |
| Claims | Count I, violation of N.J.S.A. 12A:4A-201, 12A:4A-202 and 12A:4A-203; Counts II, III and IV, each seeking the same principal sum of $1,375,000.00 on the improperly processed wire transfers. The 2025 motion to amend adds allegations but, as the opinion records, no additional legal counts |
| Disposition or status | Active. The complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim on April 26, 2022 without prejudice to amendment; reconsideration was denied November 14, 2022; a summary judgment motion was administratively terminated October 11, 2023; leave to amend was granted October 24, 2025 and an amended complaint filed October 30, 2025 |
| Status checked | 2026-09-23 · against DOJ press releases through 2026-09-22; court docket not yet read |
What does the complaint allege?
That Harborview, a domestic business that had told Cross River in writing it did not engage in foreign wire activity, lost $1,375,000.00 to fraudulent wire transfers the bank processed, and that the bank's failure to recover the funds once improperly processed constitutes gross negligence and carelessness. These are the complaint's allegations.
What did the court decide?
On April 26, 2022 it granted Cross River's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, entering the order without prejudice to the submission within 30 days of a properly supported motion to amend. Reconsideration of that dismissal was denied on November 14, 2022.
What does the 2025 amendment add?
New allegations that Cross River did not distinguish an authorisation call from a security procedure, did not maintain a written policy to identify schemes such as CEO fraud, did not investigate a high-risk client's triggering event, and did not adhere to its own Wire Room, Know Your Customer and OFAC policies. The opinion records that no additional legal counts are asserted and that Cross River filed no opposition.
Docket
15 documents in docket-entry order; attachments follow their entry. Gaps name the entries we do not have.
No. 2:21-cv-15146 — main docket
- Complaint -- Harborview Capital Partners LLC v. Cross River BankEntry 1
- —Entries 2–6 are not in the archive
- SUMMONS Returned Executed by HARBORVIEW CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC.… — Recap Pull 2026 06 12 (Dkt. 7)Entry 7
- —Entries 8–20 are not in the archive
- First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by CROSS RIVER BANK.… — Recap Pull 2026 06 12 (Dkt. 21)Entry 21
- —Entries 22–43 are not in the archive
- Opinion (motion to dismiss granted) — Harborview v. Cross RiverEntry 44
- Order (granting motion to dismiss) — Harborview v. Cross RiverEntry 45
- —Entries 46–63 are not in the archive
- Opinion (reconsideration denied) — Harborview v. Cross RiverEntry 64
- —Entries 65–93 are not in the archive
- Letter motion (stay of discovery) — Harborview v. Cross RiverEntry 94
- —Entry 95 is not in the archive
- undatedORDER granting the 94 request to stay discovery.… — Recap Pull 2026 06 12 (Dkt. 96)Entry 96
- —Entry 97 is not in the archive
- Opinion (summary judgment terminated; discovery granted) — Harborview v. Cross River (D.N.J. No. 2:21-cv-15146)Entry 98
- —Entries 99–107 are not in the archive
- Letter motion re Gilles Gade deposition — Harborview Capital Partners LLC v. Cross River BankEntry 108
- —Entries 109–116 are not in the archive
- Letter opposition (motion to compel) — Harborview v. Cross RiverEntry 117
- —Entries 118–131 are not in the archive
- NOTICE by HARBORVIEW CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC of Withdrawal of Appearance of Reid S.… — Recap Pull 2026 06 12 (Dkt. 132)Entry 132
- Opinion (leave to amend granted) — Harborview v. Cross RiverEntry 133
Documents without an entry number
Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.