Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Tracy and Carolyn Wade Information - United States v. Tracy and Carolyn Wade

Court filing

Information - United States v. Tracy and Carolyn Wade

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2024-07-25

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 0:23-cr-60173-KMW · Doc. 118 · 2024-07-25 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

The Government's Response to the Standing Discovery Order as to Defendant Carolyn Denise Wade, entered on the docket July 25, 2024 as Document 118 in United States v. Carolyn Denise Wade and Tracy D. Wade, No. 0:23-cr-60173-KMW, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It answers the Standing Discovery Order entered July 15, 2024 (D.E. 99) under Local Rule 88.10 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, listing what the government has produced and what it will disclose, including Brady and Giglio material. The government demands reciprocal discovery under Rule 16(b) and notice of any alibi defense under Rule 12.1. It states that discovery was produced on July 25, 2024 on a USB drive with records Bates stamped 23-60173-CR_006000 through 23-60173-CR_009061. The four-page response is signed by Assistant United States Attorney David A. Snider.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 23-60173-CR-WILLIAMS(s) 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  
 
 
 
 
 
 
vs. 
 
 
 
 
  
   
 
 
CAROLYN DENISE WADE and 
TRACY D. WADE, 
 
            
 
Defendants. 
________________________________________/ 
 
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER  
AS TO DEFENDANT CAROLYN DENISE WADE  
 
 
The United States hereby files this response to the Standing Discovery Order entered on 
July 15, 2024, as to Defendant Carolyn Denise Wade (D.E. 99) (“Defendant”).  This response 
also complies with Local Rule 88.10 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16. 
A. 
1. 
The government has produced or otherwise made available to Defendant 
for inspection and copying any written statements made by Defendant. 
 
 
 
 
2. 
The government has produced or otherwise made available to Defendant 
for inspection and copying any relevant oral statements made by 
Defendant before or after arrest in response to interrogation by any person 
then known to Defendant to be a government agent that the government 
intends to use at trial. 
 
3. 
No Defendant testified before the Grand Jury. 
 
4. 
The government has produced a copy of Defendant’s criminal history. 
 
5. 
To the extent not already produced to Defendant, any books, papers, 
documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places, within 
the government’s possession, custody or control, which are material to the 
preparation of Defendant’s defense, or which the government intends to 
use as evidence at trial to prove its case in chief, or which were obtained 
from or belong to Defendant, may be inspected at a mutually convenient 
time at:  the Office of the United States Attorney, 500 E. Broward Blvd, 
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Suite 700.  Please call the undersigned Assistant 
U.S. Attorney to set up a date and time that is convenient to both parties. 
Case 0:23-cr-60173-KMW   Document 118   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2024   Page 1 of 4

 
 
2 
The materials already produced and/or made available to Defendant 
pursuant to this discovery response are not necessarily copies of all the 
books, papers, documents, data, etc., that the government may intend to 
introduce at trial.  
 
6. 
There were no physical or mental examinations nor scientific tests or 
experiments made in connection with this case. 
 
B. 
 
DEMAND FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY: Pursuant to the 
Standing Discovery Order, the United States requests the disclosure and 
production of materials listed in Section (b) of Local Rule 88.10.   This 
request is also made pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of 
Criminal Procedure. 
 
C. 
 
The government will disclose any information or material which may be 
favorable on the issues of guilt or punishment within the scope of Brady v. 
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 
(1976). 
 
D. 
 
The government will disclose any payments, promises of immunity, 
leniency, preferential treatment, or other inducements made to prospective 
government witnesses, within the scope of Giglio v. United States, 405 
U.S. 150 (1972), or Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959). 
 
 
E. 
 
The government will disclose any prior convictions of any alleged co-
conspirator, accomplice or informant who will testify for the government 
at trial. 
 
F. 
 
No Defendant was identified in a lineup, show up, photo array or similar 
identification proceedings. 
 
G. 
 
The government has advised its agents and officers involved in this case to 
preserve all rough notes. 
 
H. 
 
The government will timely advise Defendant of its intent, if any, to 
introduce at trial extrinsic act evidence pursuant to F.R.E. 404(b).  
Pursuant to Local Rule 88.10, the notice will be provided regardless of 
whether the evidence may be used in the case-in-chief, for impeachment 
or possible rebuttal, and will include the general nature of the evidence.   
 
 
 
You are hereby on notice that all evidence made available to you for 
inspection, as well as all statements disclosed herein or in any future 
discovery letter, may be offered in the trial of this cause, under F.R.E. 
404(b) or otherwise (including the inextricably-intertwined doctrine). 
 
Case 0:23-cr-60173-KMW   Document 118   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2024   Page 2 of 4

 
 
3 
I. 
 
Defendant is not an aggrieved person, as defined in Title 18, United States 
Code, Section 2510(11), of any relevant electronic surveillance that was 
authorized pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2516 and 18 U.S.C §2518 and that has 
been unsealed in accordance with 18 U.S.C §2518. 
 
 
 
J. 
 
The government has ordered transcribed the Grand Jury testimony of all 
witnesses who will testify for the government at the trial of this cause. 
 
K. 
 
The government will, upon request, delivery to any chemist selected by 
the defense, who is presently registered with the Attorney General in 
compliance with 21 U.S.C. §§ 822 and 823, and 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(8), a 
sufficient representative sample of any alleged contraband which is the 
subject of this indictment, to allow independent chemical analysis of such 
sample. 
 
L. 
 
The government does not know of any automobile, vessel, or aircraft 
allegedly used in the commission of this offense that is in the 
government's possession. 
 
M. 
 
The government is not aware of any latent fingerprints or palm prints 
which have been identified by a government expert as those of Defendant. 
 
N. 
 
The government will make every possible effort in good faith to stipulate 
to all facts or points of law the truth and existence of which is not 
contested and the early resolution of which will expedite trial.  These 
stipulations will be discussed at the discovery conference. 
 
 
The United States produced the discovery referenced above to Defendant, through her 
counsel of record, on July 25, 2024.  The discovery was produced on a USB drive containing 
records in PDF format Bates stamped 23-60173-CR_006000 through 23-60173-CR_009061 and 
additional non-Bates stamped records in other formats.  The United States also reproduced to 
Defendant all prior discovery in this case, which consisted of PDF records Bates stamped 23-60173-
CR_000001 through 23-60173-CR_003755 and additional non-Bates stamped files. 
 
 
[Remainder of page intentionally blank] 
Case 0:23-cr-60173-KMW   Document 118   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2024   Page 3 of 4

 
 
4 
The government is aware of its continuing duty to disclose such newly discovered 
additional information required by the Standing Discovery Order, Rule 16(c) of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady, Giglio, Napue, and the obligation to assure a fair trial. 
 
In addition to the request made above by the government pursuant to the Standing 
Discovery Order, Local Rule 88.10(b), and Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
Procedure, in accordance with Rule 12.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the 
government hereby demands Notice of Alibi defense; the approximate time, date, and place of 
the offense was: 
 
Time: See Indictment 
Date: See Indictment 
Place: See Indictment 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
    
MARKENZY LAPOINTE 
  
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
By: /s/ David A. Snider  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David A. Snider 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Court ID No. A5502260 
500 E. Broward Blvd 
Fort Lauderdale, FL  33394 
Tel: (954) 660-5696 
Fax: (954) 356-7336 
Email: david.snider@usdoj.gov 
Case 0:23-cr-60173-KMW   Document 118   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2024   Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.654266.118.0.pdf
Size
123,829 bytes
SHA-256
29d2668c4ee2ca5efdcf51ef6c835fda16e0cbbdeab210691e8683ecf2ad0c71
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.654266.118.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top