Court filing
Indictment - United States v. Tracy and Carolyn Wade
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-04-12 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 0:23-cr-60173-KMW · Doc. 43 · 2024-04-12 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
Defendant Carolyn D. Wade's proposed jury instruction on alibi in United States of America v. Carolyn D. Wade, Case No. 0:23-cr-60173-KMW, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, filed April 12, 2024 as Document 43. The filing asks the court to give the instruction, labeled S6.1 Alibi, to the jury before deliberations. The proposed instruction would tell jurors that the government has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was present at the time and place of the crime charged, and that the defendant does not have the burden of proving an alibi. It would direct a verdict of not guilty if jurors have reasonable doubt that the defendant was present when the crime was committed. The two-page filing is signed by defense counsel Johnny L. McCray, Jr. and includes a certificate of service.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No:23-CR-60173 Williams (Graham)
v.
CAROLYN D. WADE,
Defendant.
/
DEFENDANT WADE’S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION
The Defendant, CAROLYN D. WADE, through counsel, respectfully requests
that the Court give the following instructions to the jury panel prior to their
deliberations:
Defendant’s Proposed Jury Instruction regarding
S6.1 ALIBI
Evidence has been admitted that the defendant was not present at the time
and place of the commission of the crime charged in the indictment.
The government has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt the
defendant was present at that time and place. The defendant does not have the
burden of proving an alibi defense, nor does the defendant have to convince you that
she was not present at the time and place of the commission of the crime.
If after consideration of all the evidence, you have reasonable doubt that the
defendant was present at the time the crime was committed, you must find the
defendant not guilty.
Case 0:23-cr-60173-KMW Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2024 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
USA v. Carolyn D. Wade
Proposed Jury Instruction
Case N0. 23-cr-60173 Williams/Graham
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 12, 2024, I electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the
foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission
of the Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CMF-ECF or in some other authorized
manner for those Counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically
Notices of Electronic Filing.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Johnny L. McCray, Jr., Esq.__
Johnny L. McCray, Jr., Esquire
Counsel for Defendant Wade
Florida Bar No.342319
400 E. Atlantic Boulevard
Pompano Beach, Florida 33060
(954) 954-781-3662
McCrayjlaw@gmail.com
cc: Carolyn D. Wade
Case 0:23-cr-60173-KMW Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2024 Page 2 of 2File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flsd.654266.43.0.pdf
- Size
- 146,791 bytes
- SHA-256
- d6ab8fee3dbb4130923f38f715ba903ad42d2d9f7a4a164916aff8ee01b18305
- Original
- PACER (login required)