Court filing
LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Brian Stekloff dated January 22,… — United States v. Visa Inc. (Dkt. 56)
Summary
A January 22, 2025 letter, Document 56, from Brian Stekloff of Wilkinson Stekloff LLP to Judge John G. Koeltl in United States of America v. Visa Inc., Case No. 1:24-cv-07214 (JGK), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Writing for Visa under Rule VI.A.2 of the judge's Individual Rules, it explains the need to seal and redact the Government's opposition to Visa's motion to dismiss, which the Government filed on January 19th. The opposition refers to exhibits that are non-public contracts between Visa and three non-party companies, which Visa had already been allowed to file under seal. The letter says the contracts are confidential business contracts whose disclosure would cause competitive harm, and that they are Highly Confidential Information under the case's protective order.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-01-22 |
Cite this document
“LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Brian Stekloff dated January 22,… — United States v. Visa Inc. (Dkt. 56).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-07214-JGK, Doc. 56, filed 2025-01-22. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-us-visa-sdny-69190163/2025-01-22-gov-uscourts-nysd-628802-56-0-doc-56/
, SHA-256 b722da423f174498e4432ba31c9be00d6793a9dbaca89ed9c07ae87ddf2428ff.Full text
2001 M Street NW, 10th Floor Washington, DC 20036 WWW.WILKINSONSTEKLOFF.COM ___ A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP January 22, 2025 VIA ECF FILING Honorable John G. Koeltl United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States of America v. Visa Inc.; Case No. 1:24-cv-07214 (JGK) Dear Judge Koeltl: We represent Visa Inc. in the above-referenced action. On January 19th, the Government filed its opposition to Visa’s motion to dismiss. In a separate letter-motion, the Government requested the Court’s permission to file its redacted opposition on the public docket, and to file an unredacted copy of its opposition under seal. ECF No. 50. Your Honor granted the Government’s letter-motion. ECF No. 55. We write pursuant to Rule VI.A.2 of Your Honor’s Individual Rules to “explain[ ] the need to seal [and] redact” the Government’s opposition. The Government’s opposition refers to exhibits that accompany Visa’s motion to dismiss, which are non-public contracts between Visa and three non-party companies. When Visa filed its motion to dismiss, Visa requested that Your Honor allow Visa to file its motion to dismiss with references to the substance of those agreements redacted, and to file the unredacted motion and exhibits under seal. ECF No. 36. Your Honor granted Visa’s request. ECF No. 41. The underlying reasons to redact information about the contracts remain the same: the contracts are “confidential business contracts,” and disclosure would “result in competitive harm” to Visa and its counterparties. Regeneron Pharms., Inc. v. Novartis Pharma AG, No. 1:20-cv-05502, 2021 WL 243943, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2021). And the vast majority of the language in the contracts will likely be “irrelevant to the Court’s decision” at this stage, even if it “could be very useful to a competitor.” Alto v. Sun Pharm. Indus., Inc., No. 1:19-cv-09758, 2021 WL 4480952, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2021). Additionally, the contracts are Highly Confidential Information secured by this case’s protective order. See ECF No. 42 ¶¶ 8, 24. We appreciate the Court’s consideration and would be happy to provide additional briefing to the Court if necessary. Case 1:24-cv-07214-JGK Document 56 Filed 01/22/25 Page 1 of 2 2 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brian Stekloff Brian Stekloff (admitted pro hac vice) Beth Wilkinson (SBN NY 2181592) Kieran Gostin (SBN NY 4847653) Roxana Guidero (admitted pro hac vice) WILKINSON STEKLOFF LLP 2001 M Street NW, 10th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 847-4000 Facsimile: (202) 847-4005 bstekloff@wilkinsonstekloff.com bwilkinson@wilkinsonstekloff.com kgostin@wilkinsonstekloff.com rguidero@wilkinsonstekloff.com Anne P. Davis (admitted pro hac vice) Jonathan Ian Gleklen (admitted pro hac vice) ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP 601 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 942-6197 Facsimile: (202) 942-5999 anne.davis@arnoldporter.com jonathan.gleklen@arnoldporter.com Counsel for Defendant Visa Inc. CC: All Counsel of Record (via ECF) Case 1:24-cv-07214-JGK Document 56 Filed 01/22/25 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.nysd.628802.56.0.pdf
- Size
- 155,954 bytes
- SHA-256
- b722da423f174498e4432ba31c9be00d6793a9dbaca89ed9c07ae87ddf2428ff
- Original
- PACER (login required)