Court filing
Endorsed Letter addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl — United States v. Visa Inc. (Dkt. 43, S.D.N.Y. No. 1:24-cv-07214)
Summary
Letter dated December 19, 2024, to the Honorable John G. Koeltl from counsel for defendant Visa Inc., filed in the Southern District of New York as a joint request for adjournment of the January 6, 2025 Initial Conference in In re: Visa Debit Card Antitrust Litigation. The letter asks for a short adjournment of a few weeks so the parties can meet and confer and submit a Rule 26(f) report. It states that plaintiffs in two related California actions agreed to transfer their cases to this Court and that plaintiff Pantano agreed to withdraw his motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. It also states that plaintiffs consented to the request and that there have been no prior requests for an adjournment. The signature block reads /s/ Anne P. Davis.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed December 20, 2024 in United States v. Visa Inc.; one of 237 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-12-20 |
Cite this document
“Endorsed Letter addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl — United States v. Visa Inc. (Dkt. 43, S.D.N.Y. No. 1:24-cv-07214).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-07214-JGK, Doc. 43, filed 2024-12-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-us-visa-sdny-69190163/2024-12-20-gov-uscourts-nysd-628802-43-0-doc-43/
, SHA-256 b50ae1d37d75f319580b31c7220522ed609b3f0a06304b8005011a86a579e433.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Anne.Davis@arnoldporter.com December 19, 2024 ; ( / ~ Le The Honorable John G. Koeltl Wer CZ ia aacyormn Daniel Patrick Moynihan R B ROAST AA 6,2° oe New York, NY 10007-1312 ae ee 3 Re: Inre: Visa Debit Card Antitrust Litigation, 1:24-cv-07435-JG ra Z Joint Request for Adjournment of January 6, 2025 Initial Conference ‘ On behalf of defendant Visa Inc. (“Visa”) we respectfully submit this joint request Qa [Cc by the parties for a short adjournment of the January 6, 2025 Initial Conference in the above-captioned action by a few weeks to afford the parties additional time to meet and confer and submit a Rule 26(f) report. This request would not impact the Conference in United States v. Visa Inc., 1:24-cv-07214, also scheduled for January 6. As your Honor is aware, to date four putative merchant class actions and two putative cardholder class actions have been consolidated in this Court, with a third putative consumer class action pending transfer from the Western District of Missouri. There remain two related, putative cardholder class actions pending in the Northern District of California: Pantano v. Visa, Inc., Case No. 3:24-cv-07365 (N.D. Cal.) and Bueno v. Visa Inc., 3:24-cv-8968 (N.D. Cal.). There is also a motion (filed by plaintiff Pantano) pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to centralize in the Northern District of California all private litigation concerning allegations that defendant unlawfully monopolized a purported market for debit network services. See MDL No. 3137, ECF No. 1. Earlier this week, plaintiffs in both of those California actions agreed to voluntarily transfer their cases to this Court and plaintiff Pantano has agreed to withdraw his motion before the JEML. Accordingly, Visa anticipates that all of the related private merchant and cardholder actions that are not currently pending in this District will be transferred here soon. In the interest of efficiency, Visa proposed to both the merchant and consumer plaintiffs that the parties wait a few weeks for these venue issues to be fully resolved so that all parties may participate together in a single Rule 26(f) meet and confer. Visa also contacted the government in the related action (United States v. Visa Inc., 1:24-cv-07214), Arnoid & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 250 West 55th Street | New York, NY 10019-9710 | www.arnoldporter.com US 253579370 Arnold &: Porter December 19, 2024 Page 2 to commence discussions on coordination among the government and private actions. Those discussions will also inform the issues to be addressed in the Rule 26(f) conference. Plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions agreed to a short adjournment of the Initial Conference by a few weeks in light of those issues, and consented to this application. Pursuant to ILE. of Your Honor’s Individual Practices, we confirm that there have been no prior requests for an adjournment of this conference. Thank you for considering this request. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Anne P. Davis Copies to all counsel of record by ECF
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.nysd.628802.43.0.pdf
- Size
- 2,289,509 bytes
- SHA-256
- b50ae1d37d75f319580b31c7220522ed609b3f0a06304b8005011a86a579e433
- Original
- PACER (login required)