ORDER REFERRING CASE to a randomly assigned Magistrate Judge for… — United States v. Visa Inc. and Plaid Inc. (Dkt. 61)

Summary

In United States v. Visa Inc., et al., the Court refers all discovery disputes, including those raised in the case management conference statement, to a randomly assigned Magistrate Judge. It states that any further amendments to the protective order are to be presented to the Magistrate Judge. The Court says it intends to schedule trial for June or July 2021 and directs the parties to meet and confer and offer proposed dates for pretrial and trial. It states that a scheduling order will follow the case management conference. The signature block names Jeffrey S. White, United States District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
VISA INC., et al., 
Defendants. 
 
Case No.  20-cv-07810-JSW    
 
ORDER REFERRING DISCOVERY TO 
RANDOMLY ASSIGNED 
MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND 
 
ORDER TO PARTIES RE TRIAL 
DATE 
Re: Dkt. No. 57 
 
 
 
This matter is scheduled for an initial case management conference on December 18, 2020.  
The Court has received the parties joint case management conference statement.  The case 
management conference remains on calendar.   
 
The Court HEREBY REFERS all discovery disputes, including those raised in the case 
management conference statement, to a randomly assigned Magistrate Judge.  See N.D. Civ. L.R. 
72-1.  Any further amendments to the protective order shall be presented to the Magistrate Judge 
assigned to the case.  The Court will not address discovery related issues at the case management 
conference. 
 
The Court also has considered the parties positions on timing, and it intends to schedule 
trial for June or July 2021.  The parties shall meet and confer in advance of the case management 
conference and shall be prepared to offer the Court proposed dates for pretrial (which should be 
three weeks prior to the trial date – if the parties believe a shorter time frame is required, they must 
show extremely good cause to alter the Court’s normal schedule) and trial.   
// 
// 
Case 4:20-cv-07810-JSW   Document 61   Filed 12/15/20   Page 1 of 2

 
2 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
Following the case management conference, the Court will issue a scheduling order based 
on the trial date selected. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: December 15, 2020 
______________________________________ 
JEFFREY S. WHITE 
United States District Judge 
 
Cc: Magistrate Referral Clerk 
Case 4:20-cv-07810-JSW   Document 61   Filed 12/15/20   Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.368439.61.0.pdf

Size

70,848 bytes

SHA-256

910de186bb1c7a9f915ca3a163005bacb960e5d8df5e31a2f38fabc02d12d379

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.368439.61.0.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com