Court filing
Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of Consented-To Motion for Leave to File a Response to Brief of the American Hotel & Lodging Association as Amicus Curiae — Accordius Health at Asheville, LLC v. United States Small Business Administration (Dkt. 40, W.D.N.C.)
Summary
Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Consented-To Motion for Leave to File a Response to Brief of the American Hotel & Lodging Association as Amicus Curiae in Accordius Health at Asheville, LLC v. United States Small Business Administration, et al., Case No. 1:23-CV-00129-MR, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, filed April 26, 2024. The defendants seek leave to respond to the proposed amicus brief (Doc. 37-1), which supports the plaintiffs' Administrative Procedure Act challenge concerning the Corporate Group Rule. They state that the amicus brief addresses hotels and borrowers in the hospitality industry, while the plaintiffs are skilled nursing facilities that do not operate in that industry.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed April 26, 2024 in Accordius Health at Asheville, LLC v. United States Small Business Administration; one of 14 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-04-26 |
Cite this document
“Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of Consented-To Motion for Leave to File a Response to Brief of the American Hotel & Lodging Association as Amicus Curiae — Accordius Health at Asheville, LLC v. United States Small Business Administration (Dkt. 40, W.D.N.C.).”
U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, No. 1:23-cv-00129, Doc. 40, filed 2024-04-26. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-united-states-small-business-administration-ncwd-112035/2024-04-26-gov-uscourts-ncwd-112035-40-0-doc-40/
, SHA-256 f219201900990a88c782cebd602cd4918bc2c5527abcfc8e75f4e83f8a67e6be.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CASE NO. 1:23-CV-00129-MR
ACCORDIUS HEALTH AT )
ASHEVILLE, LLC, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
UNITED STATES SMALL )
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, )
et al., )
)
Defendants. )
DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CONSENTED-TO
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO BRIEF OF THE
AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION AS AMICUS CURIAE
NOW COME the Defendants, by and through the undersigned, in support of
Defendants’ motion for leave to file a proposed response to the proposed amicus
brief (Doc. 37-1) lodged by the American Hotel & Lodging Association (“AHLA”)
supporting Plaintiffs in this action under the Administrative Procedure Act
concerning application of the Corporate Group Rule, Defendants state as follows:
1. The AHLA brief advances certain contentions regarding the application
of the Corporate Group Rule particular to hotels and borrowers in the hospitality
industry.
Case 1:23-cv-00129-MR Document 40 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 3
2. If the Court considers the AHLA brief, it would be helpful for the Court
to also consider Defendants’ proposed response.
3. As the proposed response explains: Plaintiffs are skilled nursing
facilities. They do not operate in the hospitality industry. Hence, they could not
have based, and did not base, the instant APA challenge on SBA’s application of the
Corporate Group Rule to borrowers in that industry. AHLA’s contentions thus
should not be addressed in this action. In any event, even if the Court were to
entertain them, AHLA’s arguments fail. The Rule is consistent with the text,
structure, and legal context of the CARES Act, and Congress ratified it in subsequent
legislation. Summary judgment should thus be granted to SBA.
4. Accordingly, if the Court considers the AHLA brief, it would be helpful
for the Court to also consider the Defendant’ proposed response, which is attached
as Exhibit A.
2
Case 1:23-cv-00129-MR Document 40 Filed 04/26/24 Page 2 of 3
Respectfully submitted, this the 26th day of April, 2024.
DENA J. KING BRIAN M. BOYNTON
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Principal Deputy Ass’t Attorney General
BRIAN D. NETTER
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
s/Gill P. Beck s/James J. Gilligan
GILL P. BECK JAMES J. GILLIGAN, T.A. (DC
Assistant United States Attorney #422152)
Chief, Civil Division INDRANEEL SUR (DC #978017)
N.C. Bar No. 13175 Attorneys
Room 233, US Courthouse United States Department of Justice
100 Otis Street Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
Asheville, NC 28801 P.O. Box 883, Ben Franklin Station
Phone: 828-271-4661 Washington, D.C. 20044
Fax: 828-271-4327 E-mail: james.gilligan@usdoj.gov
E-Mail: gill.beck@usdoj.gov Telephone: (202) 514-3358
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Counsel for Defendants
3
Case 1:23-cv-00129-MR Document 40 Filed 04/26/24 Page 3 of 3File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.ncwd.112035.40.0.pdf
- Size
- 183,167 bytes
- SHA-256
- f219201900990a88c782cebd602cd4918bc2c5527abcfc8e75f4e83f8a67e6be
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com