[Proposed] Order — Gold Club SF, LLC v. United States Small Business Administration (Dkt. 25, N.D. Cal.)

Summary

In Gold Club SF, LLC, et al. v. United States Small Business Administration, et al. (Case 3:24-cv-04241-LJC; Case No. 3:24-cv-4241-LJC), U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, signed Document 25 on December 18, 2024. Entered pursuant to stipulation on the [Proposed] Order form, the one-page order directs Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint by January 21, 2025, and stays Defendants' deadline to produce the administrative record. The order requires the parties to propose a timeline for producing the administrative record as part of a joint status report due within 14 days of the Court's resolution of Defendants' motion to dismiss or the filing of Defendants' answer.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Case 3:24-cv-04241-LJC          Document 25       Filed 12/18/24      Page 1 of 1




 1                                    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 2                                 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 3                                        SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

 4   GOLD CLUB SF, LLC, et al.,                       ) CASE NO. 3:24-cv-4241-LJC
                                                      )
 5           Plaintiffs,                              ) [PROPOSED] ORDER
                                                      )
 6      v.                                            )
                                                      )
 7   UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS                     )
     ADMINISTRATION, et al.,                          )
 8                                                    )
             Defendants.                              )
 9                                                    )
                                                      )
10

11           Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
12           1.      Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint by
13                   January 21, 2025.
14           2.      Defendants’ deadline to produce the administrative record is stayed. The parties shall
15 propose a timeline for the production of the administrative record (or records) as part of the joint status

16 report to be filed within 14 days of the Court’s resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss (if such a

17 motion is filed) or the filing of Defendants’ answer.

18
19 DATED: December
          ____________
                   18, 2024
                                                           HON. LISA J CISNEROS
20                                                         United States Magistrate Judge
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

     [PROPOSED] ORDER
     CASE NO. 3:24-CV-4241-LJC

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.432603.25.0.pdf

Size

191,421 bytes

SHA-256

449619278cd78f401d4e43fdfc988cc1177bd1c337be9f0fb0cb4153d7924407

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.432603.25.0.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com