Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Alliance Hospice Care, LLC v. United States of America case — U.S. Court of Federal Claims Complaint — Alliance Hospice Care, LLC v. United States of America (Dkt. 1, Fed. Cl.)

Court filing

Complaint — Alliance Hospice Care, LLC v. United States of America (Dkt. 1, Fed. Cl.)

Summary

A complaint filed October 1, 2024 as Document 1 by Alliance Hospice Care, LLC, through attorney Venar Ayar, against the United States, acting through the Internal Revenue Service, in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Case No. 24-1547 T. It invokes jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1491 and claims a refund of form 941 employment taxes and refundable tax credits related to the Employee Retention Credit created by the CARES Act. The complaint describes employers' obligations to withhold and report FICA taxes on form 941 and how the credit is applied against those taxes, with any excess treated as refundable. It asks for judgment of $71,472.50 plus interest, costs and attorney's fees.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed October 1, 2024 in Alliance Hospice Care, LLC v. United States of America; one of 9 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. Court of Federal Claims
Filed2024-10-01

Cite this document

“Complaint — Alliance Hospice Care, LLC v. United States of America (Dkt. 1, Fed. Cl.).” U.S. Court of Federal Claims, No. 1:24-cv-01547, Doc. 1, filed 2024-10-01. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-united-states-of-america-uscfc-69218642/2024-10-01-gov-uscourts-uscfc-69218642-1-0-doc-1/, SHA-256 e8bee7e737fa7ef8e73f20666c2d40554ed7e628aa0afbd82bfb66ace623615f.

Full text

Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 1 of 9
                                                     Receipt number BUSFCC-9886669



                        UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                    IN THE COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS


ALLIANCE HOSPICE CARE, LLC,                   )
                                              )
      Plaintiff,                              )
                                              )     Case No.      24-1547 T
v.                                            )
                                              )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                     )
                                              )
      Defendant.                              )
                                              /

                                    COMPLAINT

      NOW COMES Alliance Hospice Care, LLC (hereinafter “Plaintiff” or

“Alliance Hospice") by and through its attorney, Venar Ayar, and files its

Complaint against Defendant, United States of America (“Defendant” or “United

States”), and alleges as follows:

                                    THE PARTIES

      1.      Plaintiff is a Massachusetts limited liability company with residence

and principal place of business at 36 Jaconnet Street, Suite 105, Newton,

Massachusetts, 02461.

      2.      Defendant is the United States of America, acting through its agency,

the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).

           Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 2 of 9




      3.      The Plaintiff has not begun any other lawsuits in state or federal court

dealing with the same or similar facts as this action.

      4.      A statement required under R.C.F.C. 9(m)(2)(B) is attached hereto as

Exhibit A.

                          JURISDICTION AND VENUE

      5.      This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491.

                             LEGAL BACKGROUND

                             Federal Employment Taxes

      6.      Plaintiff is claiming a refund of form 941 employment taxes and

refundable tax credits related to the Employee Retention Credit.

      7.      Employers are required by law to withhold federal income taxes and

Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”) taxes from their employees’ wages,

remit these withholdings, and report them to the IRS on tax form 941.

      8.      Employers are also responsible for paying FICA taxes and reporting

such taxes to the IRS on tax form 941. 26 U.S.C §§ 3102 and 3111.

      9.      Employers are usually obligated to file IRS form 941 on a quarterly

basis with the IRS. 26 U.S.C § 6011; 26 C.F.R. § 31.6071 (a) – 1.

                           The Employee Retention Credit

      10.     In response to the Coronavirus Pandemic, Congress passed the

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). Pub. L. 116-

         Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 3 of 9




136 (Mar. 27, 2020). Section 2301 of the CARES Act provided a refundable tax

credit called the Employee Retention Credit (“ERC”) to eligible employers on

qualified wages paid to their employees. Pub. L. 116-136, § 2301. The ERC

program was amended and extended under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of

2021, Pub. L. 116-260, § 206 (Dec. 27, 2020), and the American Rescue Plan Act

of 2021, Pub. L. 117-2, § 3134 (Mar. 11, 2021), and terminated under the

Infrastructure, Investment and Jobs Act, Pub. L. 117-58, § 80604, (Nov. 15, 2021).

See also 26 U.S.C. § 3134.

      11.    A business that is an eligible employer that pays qualified wages after

March 12, 2020, and through December 31, 2021, is entitled to claim the

Employee Retention Credit against its federal employment taxes on the applicable

form 941 tax return for that quarter.

      12.    Section 2301(b)(3) of the CARES Act states that if the amount of the

credit exceeds the amount of federal employment taxes for any applicable quarter,

then the excess is treated as an overpayment and refunded to the employer.

                         General Qualifying Requirements

                             (I) Threshold Requirements

        Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 4 of 9




      13.   An eligible employer is one that is defined as carrying on a trade or

business during calendar years 2020 and 2021 and, with respect to any calendar

quarter for which the business experienced one of the following:

            (a)    Its operations were fully or partially suspended due to orders

      issued by a governing authority in response to COVID-19 (“Full or Partial

      Suspension Test”) that limited commerce, travel, or group meetings or,

            (b)    The business experienced a significant decline in gross receipts

      (“The Gross Receipts Test”) for any calendar quarter of 2020 and/or 2021

      compared to the corresponding quarter of 2019. 26 U.S.C. § 3134(c)(2).

                               (II) Qualified Wages

      14.   If an eligible employer had not more than 100 average full-time

employees in 2019, wages that were paid to an employee during quarters in 2020

constituted qualified wages. Pub. L. 116-136, § 2301(c)(3)

      15.   If an eligible employer had not more than 500 average full-time

employees in 2019, wages that were paid to an employee during the quarters in

2021 constituted qualified wages. 26 U.S.C. § 3134(c)(3).

                            (III) Calculation of Credit

      16.   For 2020, the employee retention credit is limited to 50% of qualified

wages that an eligible employer pays to an employee in a calendar quarter. Pub. L.

         Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 5 of 9




116-136, § 2301(a). The maximum amount of qualified wages that the credit can

be claimed against is $10,000 per employee for the entire calendar year of 2020. §

2301(b)(1).

      17.     For 2021, the employee retention credit is limited to 70% of qualified

wages that an eligible employer pays in a calendar quarter. 26 U.S.C. § 3431(a).

The maximum amount of qualified wages that the credit can be claimed against is

$10,000 per employee per quarter in 2021. 26 U.S.C. § 3431(b)(1).

                           FACTUAL BACKGROUND

      18.     Plaintiff operates a business of providing palliative and hospice

services to elderly in the State of Massachusetts.

      19.     Plaintiff had an average of less than 100 full-time employees during

the calendar year 2019.

      20.     To the extent the Plaintiff applied and received loan forgiveness under

the Paycheck Protection Program, a Shuttered Venue Operators Grant or a grant

from the Restaurant Revitalization Fund, the Plaintiff did not include wages

included on those applications in its calculation of qualified wages in its claim for

the ERC.

      21.     Plaintiff did not include the wages of any individuals who directly or

indirectly owns more than 50% of Plaintiff or any relatives or spouses of any

        Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 6 of 9




individuals who directly or indirectly own more than 50% of Plaintiff in its

calculations of the ERC.

      22.    Plaintiff is not a party to any employee leasing arrangement and did

not otherwise lease employees.

      23.    Plaintiff is not a part of an affiliated service group within the meaning

contained in 26 U.S.C. § 414(m).

      24.    Plaintiff is not a member of a consolidated group of corporations and

is not under common control with any other trades or businesses.

                                     COUNT I

             Plaintiff Refund Claim on 941-X for Fourth Quarter 2020

      25.    On July 9, 2023, Plaintiff signed an amended IRS Form 941-X for the

taxable period ending December 31, 2020, claiming a refund of tax and an ERC in

the amount of $27,890.50 plus interest. Attached hereto as Exhibit B.

      26.    The return was mailed to the Internal Revenue Service Cincinnati

Service Center on July 10, 2023. Proof of mailing is attached hereto as Exhibit C.

      27.    The IRS Account Transcripts confirm the receipt of the claim on July

14, 2023, and reflects a forwarded for processing date of July 14, 2023. A true and

correct copy of the Account Transcript for fourth quarter 2020 is attached hereto as

Exhibit D.

          Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 7 of 9




        28.   More than six months have elapsed since the Plaintiff’s claim was

filed with the IRS.

        29.   There is currently no outstanding balance owed from the Plaintiff for

fourth quarter 2020.

        30.   Plaintiff qualified itself as an eligible employer for this quarter under

the Gross Receipts Test.

        31.   Plaintiff had gross receipts on or about $102,096.27 for fourth quarter

2019.

        32.   Plaintiff had gross receipts on or about $25,216.91 for fourth quarter

2020.

        33.   Plaintiff had about a 75.3% decrease in gross receipts from fourth

quarter 2019 to fourth quarter 2020.

        34.   Defendant has not rejected or accepted the Plaintiff’s claim for a

refund for fourth quarter 2020.

        35.   Plaintiff paid qualifying wages of $55,781 in fourth quarter 2020 and

calculated an ERC of $27,890.50 for fourth quarter 2020.

         Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 8 of 9




                                     COUNT II

              Plaintiff Refund Claim on 941-X for First Quarter 2021

      36.    On July 9, 2023, Plaintiff signed an amended IRS Form 941-X for the

taxable period ending March 31, 2021, claiming a refund of tax and an ERC in the

amount of $43,582 plus interest. Attached hereto as Exhibit E.

      37.    The return was mailed to the Internal Revenue Service Cincinnati

Service Center on July 10, 2023. Proof of mailing is attached hereto as Exhibit F.

      38.     The IRS Account Transcripts confirm the receipt of the claim on July

14, 2023, and reflects a forwarded for processing date of July 14, 2023. A true and

correct copy of the Account Transcript for first quarter 2021 is attached hereto as

Exhibit G.

      39.    More than six months have elapsed since the Plaintiff’s claim was

filed with the IRS.

      40.    There is currently no outstanding balance owed from the Plaintiff for

first quarter 2021.

      41.    Plaintiff qualified itself as an eligible employer for this quarter under

the Gross Receipts Test.

      42.    Plaintiff made an election under 26 U.S.C. § 3134(c)(2)(B) to use the

immediately preceding calendar quarter to qualify under the Gross Receipts Test.

          Case 1:24-cv-01547-EMR Document 1 Filed 10/01/24 Page 9 of 9




        43.    Plaintiff had gross receipts on or about $102,096.27 for fourth quarter

2019.

        44.    Plaintiff had gross receipts on or about $25,216.91 for fourth quarter

2020.

        45.    Plaintiff had about a 75.3% decrease in gross receipts from fourth

quarter 2019 to fourth quarter 2020.

        46.    Defendant has not rejected or accepted the Plaintiff’s claim for a

refund for first quarter 2021.

        47.    Plaintiff paid qualifying wages of $62,260 in first quarter 2021 and

calculated an ERC of $43,582 for first quarter 2021.

        WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Honorable Court award judgment in

favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $71,472.50 plus interest,

costs and attorney’s fees, and grant any further relief this Court may find

appropriate.

                                         Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: October 1, 2024

                                         By: /s/ Venar Ayar
                                         Venar Ayar
                                         Counsel for Plaintiff
                                         30095 Northwestern Hwy, Ste. 102
                                         Farmington Hills, MI 48334
                                         (248) 262-3400
                                         venar@ayarlaw.com

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.uscfc.69218642.1.0.pdf
Size
189,117 bytes
SHA-256
e8bee7e737fa7ef8e73f20666c2d40554ed7e628aa0afbd82bfb66ace623615f
Our copy
gov.uscourts.uscfc.69218642.1.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top