Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) — United States v. Solomon (Dkt. 67, D. Minn.)

Summary

An AO 247 order regarding a motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in United States v. Tequisha Solomon, Case No. 22-cr-131 (ECT/DTS), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, dated and filed May 20, 2024 as Doc. 67. On the pro se defendant's motion for a reduction based on a guideline range later lowered and made retroactive under 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and considering USSG §1B1.10 and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, the court denies the motion. All provisions of the judgment dated August 15, 2023 remain in effect. The order is signed by U.S. District Court Judge Eric C. Tostrud.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19)   Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

__________ District of __________

United States of America
)
)
)
)
)
)

v.

Case No:
USM No:
Date of Original Judgment:
Date of Previous Amended Judgment:
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)
Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of
u the defendant u the Director of the Bureau of Prisons u the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
u DENIED.
u GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) of
months is reduced to
.

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated
shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date:
Judge’s signature

Effective Date:
(if different from order date)
Printed name and title

(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Defendant  Tequisha Solomon  is  ineligible for a sentence reduction because the
amendment is not applicable to her, pursuant to USSG §1B1.10(a)(2)(A). Specifically, Ms.
Solomon was determined to have 14 criminal history points at the time of sentencing, and she
did not incur status points. Therefore, neither USSG §§4C1.1 or 4A1.1(d) (now (e)) apply.

              District of Minnesota

Tequisha Solomon
22-cr-131 (ECT/DTS)

08/15/2023

pro se

✔

✔

08/15/2023

05/20/2024
s/ Eric C. Tostrud

Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Court Judge

CASE 0:22-cr-00131-ECT-DTS     Doc. 67     Filed 05/20/24     Page 1 of 1


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mnd.201677.67.0.pdf

Size

206,002 bytes

SHA-256

c5158b6393bc2d8f176fbba0d8de9ce622febcbd9f9ce071f78578fe708f55d0

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mnd.201677.67.0.pdf

Original

archive.org