Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Eric Shibley Indictment - United States v. Eric Shibley

Court filing

Indictment - United States v. Eric Shibley

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Filed2021-12-17

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington · No. 2:20-cr-00174-JCC · Doc. 140 · 2021-12-17 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Motion for Combined Orders of Forfeiture - 1 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET. SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
The Hon. John C. Coughenour 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 
AT SEATTLE 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
ERIC SHIBLEY,  
 
Defendant.  
NO. CR20-174-JCC 
 
 
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A 
COMBINED PRELIMINARY 
ORDER OF FORFEITURE AND 
ORDER OF FORFEITURE 
 
NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: 
December 31, 2021 
 
The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, moves pursuant to 
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“Fed. R. Crim. P.”) 32.2(b) for entry of a Combined 
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and Order of Forfeiture, seeking to forfeit, to the 
United States, Defendant Eric Shibley’s interest in the following property (collectively, 
the “Subject Property”): 
1. 
$49,500.86 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 29, 2020 from Navy 
Federal Credit Union account #******7528, held in the name of Eric R. 
Shibley MD PLLC (“Subject Property 1”); 
2. 
$100,000.00 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 29, 2020 from Wells 
Fargo account #******2378, held in the name of ES1 LLC (“Subject 
Property 2”);  
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 140     Filed 12/17/21     Page 1 of 6

 
 
 
 
Motion for Combined Orders of Forfeiture - 2 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET. SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
3. 
$804,816.63 in U.S. funds, seized on or about May 27, 2020 from Wells 
Fargo account #******3536, held in the name of The A Team Holdings 
LLC (“Subject Property 3”);  
4. 
$114,440.00 in U.S. funds, seized on or about June 30, 2020 from Verity 
Credit Union account #***5390, held in the name of Dituri Construction 
LLC (“Subject Property 4”);  
5. 
$114,743.59 in U.S. funds, seized on or about June 30, 2020 from Verity 
Credit Union account #***5320, held in the name of SS1 LLC (“Subject 
Property 5”); and 
6. 
A sum of money in the amount of $254,199, reflecting the remainder of the 
proceeds the Defendant personally obtained from the offenses (“Subject 
Property 6”). 
This motion is based on the following facts, which are reflected in the record. 
I. 
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture 
The United States submits that entry of a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture 
regarding Subject Properties 1-5 is appropriate because: 
A. 
Wire Fraud: 
• 
The Defendant has been convicted of Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 
U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2, as charged in Counts 1 – 7 of the Indictment 
(Dkt. No. 31 at pp. 9 – 13); 
• 
Property that constitutes or is traceable to proceeds of a Wire Fraud 
scheme is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 
by way of 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); 
• 
The evidence presented at trial established that Subject Properties 1 
– 5 constitute or are traceable to proceeds of the Defendant’s Wire 
Fraud scheme; 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 140     Filed 12/17/21     Page 2 of 6

 
 
 
 
Motion for Combined Orders of Forfeiture - 3 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET. SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
• 
The evidence in the record established the requisite nexus between 
Subject Properties 1 – 5 and the offense of conviction (Wire Fraud), 
pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“Fed. R. Crim. P.”) 
32.2.(b)(1)(A)-(B). 
B. 
Bank Fraud: 
• 
The Defendant has been convicted of Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 
U.S.C. §§ 1344(2) and 2, as charged in Counts 8 – 10 (Dkt. No. 31 at 
pp. 14 – 15) of the Indictment; 
• 
Property that constitutes or is traceable to proceeds of a Bank Fraud 
scheme is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2); 
• 
The evidence presented at trial established that Subject Properties 
1 – 3 constitute or are traceable to proceeds of the Defendant’s Bank 
Fraud scheme; 
• 
The evidence in the record established the requisite nexus between 
Subject Properties 1 – 3 and the offense of conviction (Bank Fraud), 
pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2.(b)(1)(A)-(B). 
C. 
Money Laundering: 
• 
The Defendant has been convicted of Money Laundering, in 
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1957 and 2, as charged in Counts 11 – 15 
(Dkt. No. 31 at p. 16); 
• 
Property involved in Money Laundering is subject to forfeiture 
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1); 
• 
The evidence presented at trial established that Subject Properties 
4 – 5 are involved in, or traceable to property involved in, one or 
more of the Defendant’s Money Laundering offenses;  
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 140     Filed 12/17/21     Page 3 of 6

 
 
 
 
Motion for Combined Orders of Forfeiture - 4 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET. SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
• 
The evidence in the record established the requisite nexus between 
Subject Properties 4 – 5 and the offense of conviction (Money 
Laundering), pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2.(b)(1)(A)-(B). 
 
II. 
Order of Forfeiture 
The United States submits that forfeiture of all proceeds the Defendant obtained 
from his Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud schemes – $2,821,200 – is appropriate.  To the 
extent any of these proceeds have not been recovered by the United States and the 
Financial Institutions, entry of an Order of Forfeiture forfeiting a sum of money reflecting 
these unrecovered proceeds is appropriate.  The United States submits that entry of an 
Order of Forfeiture in the amount of $254,199, reflecting the unrecovered proceeds of the 
Defendant’s Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud schemes, is appropriate because: 
A. 
Wire Fraud: 
• 
The proceeds of Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 
2, are subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), by 
way of 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); 
B. 
Bank Fraud:   
• 
The proceeds of Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344(2) 
and 2, are subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2); 
C. 
Based on the evidence presented at trial: 
• 
The Defendant obtained proceeds of approximately $2,821,200 from 
his Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud schemes; 
• 
The Defendant withdrew approximately $200,000 of these proceeds 
in bulk cash; 
• 
The United States seized a total of approximately $1,183.501 
(Subject Properties 1 - 5) with seizure warrants; 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 140     Filed 12/17/21     Page 4 of 6

 
 
 
 
Motion for Combined Orders of Forfeiture - 5 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET. SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
• 
Financial institutions recovered a total of approximately $1,383,500; 
and 
• 
A sum of money in the amount of $254,199 reflects the remaining 
unrecovered proceeds received by the Defendant. 
To comply with the timing requirements of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(B), the 
United States now moves for entry of a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture forfeiting the 
Defendant’s interest in Subject Properties 1-5 and an Order of Forfeiture forfeiting the 
Defendant’s interest in Subject Property 6.  A proposed Combined Order is submitted 
with this motion. 
DATED this 17th day of December, 2021. 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
 
NICHOLAS W. BROWN 
United States Attorney 
 
s/Krista K. Bush 
 
 
 
BRIAN WERNER 
KRISTA K. BUSH 
Assistant United States Attorneys 
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 
Seattle, Washington 98101 
Telephone: (206) 553-7970 
E-mail: brian.werner@usdoj.gov 
Email: krista.bush@usdoj.gov 
 
JOSEPH BEEMSTERBOER 
Acting Chief, Fraud Section 
 
s/Laura Connelly 
 
 
 
LAURA CONNELLY 
Trial Attorney 
U.S. Department of Justice 
1400 New York Avenue NW 
Washington, D.C.  20005 
Telephone: (202) 307-1423 
E-mail: laura.connelly@usdoj.gov 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 140     Filed 12/17/21     Page 5 of 6

 
 
 
 
Motion for Combined Orders of Forfeiture - 6 
United States v. Shibley, CR20-174-JCC 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
700 STEWART STREET. SUITE 5220 
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 
(206) 553-7970 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I hereby certify that on December 17, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing 
with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which automatically serves the 
parties of record. 
 
s/Hannah G. Williams 
 
 
HANNAH G. WILLIAMS 
FSA Paralegal II, Contractor 
United States Attorney’s Office 
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 
Seattle, Washington  98101 
(206) 553-2242 
Hannah.Williams2@usdoj.gov 
 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00174-JCC     Document 140     Filed 12/17/21     Page 6 of 6

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wawd.290911.140.0.pdf
Size
214,990 bytes
SHA-256
e70c914efa9cc31d93e1a932870f546a85acfc7cbf3a2380c340d416124d78ff
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wawd.290911.140.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top