Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Shibley United States v. Eric Shibley — W.D. Wash., No. CR20-0174-JCC Memorandum Opinion - United States v. Shibley companion docket

Court filing

Memorandum Opinion - United States v. Shibley companion docket

Filed November 5, 2021 in Shibley; one of 140 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Filed2021-11-05

Full text

Honorable John Coughenour 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
) 
No. CR20-174 JCC 
) 
Plaintiff, 
) 
DEFENSE PROPOSED 
) 
VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 
v. 
) 
) 
ERIC SHIBLEY, 
) 
Defendant. 
) 
 
  
) 
 
Defendant Eric Shibley, through his undersigned attorney, respectfully requests 
that the following general questions be posed to potential jurors in this case : 
1
Eric Shibley is a 42-year-old man, a naturalized U.S. citizen originally from 
Bangladesh, now charged with wire and bank fraud and money laundering arising from various 
loan applications he made in the spring of 2020 in connection with the federal Paycheck 
Protection Program and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan program.   
 Alternatively, defense counsel respectfully suggests that these questions be posed to the 
1
venire panel, in advance of formal voir dire proceedings, in the form of a written 
questionnaire redacted of any pleading identifiers, with appropriate follow-up in voir 
dire.  The court and parties would benefit from far greater candor than we are likely to 
receive from questions originating in court from the bench or counsel.  Even in more 
normal times (without mandatory masking and Plexiglass barriers) summoned citizens, 
many of whom appear reluctantly, are asked to comment on sensitive matters, all in a 
very public forum amongst strangers.  A questionnaire would help avoid the fiction that 
we are getting heartfelt answers to important questions.  A suggested questionnaire is 
attached for the court’s consideration.
1
Michael Nance  
 
 
 Attorney at Law 
 
 
P.O. Box 11276 
 
 
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 
 
 
(206) 624-3211

1.  Have you read or heard anything about this case before coming to court 
today? 
    If so, what have you read or heard?   
2.  As a result of what you have read or heard about this case, have you formed 
any opinion or belief about the guilt or innocence of the defendant or about the way this 
case has been handled by the United States government?         
If so, please explain. 
   
   3.  Are you familiar with the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) under the 
CARES Act?   
 
a.  Have you or an immediate family member ever applied for a PPP loan? 
          b.  Or for a loan through the federal Small Business Administration (SBA)? 
       
 
4.  Do you have any particular thought or feelings on the government policy 
of providing loan assistance on very lenient terms?     
 
5.  Does anyone feel the government policy of, under certain conditions, 
loan forgiveness of government loans in which the borrower does not have to pay 
the money back?   
6.  Have you or an immediate family member ever been employed by or connected 
with: 
a.
 any state or local law enforcement agency? 
b. prosecuting attorney's office? 
2
Michael Nance  
 
 
 Attorney at Law 
 
 
P.O. Box 11276 
 
 
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 
 
 
(206) 624-3211

c.
a federal, state or local correctional facility?
d. U.S. immigration or U.S. customs enforcement? 
e.
any federal law enforcement agency? 
f.
any other federal agency? 
g.
any public or private entity as a security guard? 
h. any federal, state or local court system? 
i.
any court probation or parole office? 
j.
military police? 
          6.   Have you ever served on a state or federal grand jury? 
7.  Have you ever served as a trial juror?  Criminal or civil?  
8.  Have you ever testified at a trial or deposition or other legal proceeding? 
          9.  Do you have any opinions, either positive or negative, about how federal 
law enforcement agencies operate? 
       10.  Would you be able to judge the credibility of an FBI or other federal law 
enforcement agent witness or a police officer in the same way as any other 
witness? 
3
Michael Nance  
 
 
 Attorney at Law 
 
 
P.O. Box 11276 
 
 
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 
 
 
(206) 624-3211

      11.   Would you tend to give greater weight or credibility, even slightly, to the 
testimony of a law enforcement officer merely because he or she is testifying for 
the government? 
       12.  Are you or any immediate family members foreign-born who later became 
naturalized United States citizens? 
       13.  Does you have experience, either in your work or socially, with recent 
immigrants to the United States? 
       14.  Do you understand that the fact that a defendant has been indicted by a grand 
jury is not evidence of guilt and is merely the way a charge is brought to trial? 
        15.  Does anyone disagree with the principle that a criminal defendant is presumed 
innocent? Would you require the defendant to prove his innocence of the charges?
       
        16.  Do you feel it is unfair to the government to require it to prove every element of 
the charged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt?
  
       17. A defendant has no burden, nor is he required, to testify in his own defense. 
Would any prospective juror require that the defendant testify at this trial or produce 
other evidence to prove his innocence? 
18.. Would you be more comfortable answering any of the above questions out of 
the presence of the other jurors?
4
Michael Nance  
 
 
 Attorney at Law 
 
 
P.O. Box 11276 
 
 
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 
 
 
(206) 624-3211

19.  Do you have other significant feelings about the general subject matter of this 
case that you feel should be discussed with the court and parties?
20. Based on what you know at this point, do you have any concerns about your 
own ability to fairly judge the evidence in this case? 
         21.  Have you received a coronavirus vaccination? 
         22.  If not, what is the reason you have not been vaccinated? 
          23.  Other than hardship because of the expected length of the trial is there any 
reason why you would not want to serve as a juror in this case?   
 
Respectfully submitted this 5th day of November, 2021. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  Michael Nance, WSBA #13933 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Attorney for Eric Shibley 
5
Michael Nance  
 
 
 Attorney at Law 
 
 
P.O. Box 11276 
 
 
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 
 
 
(206) 624-3211

Certificate of Service 
I hereby certify that on the 5th day of November, 2021, I electronically filed the 
foregoing with the clerk of the court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing 
will be sent electronically to counsel of record for other parties. 
                                                            /s/ Michael Nance   
                                                           email: michaelnancelaw@gmail.com 
6
Michael Nance  
 
 
 Attorney at Law 
 
 
P.O. Box 11276 
 
 
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 
 
 
(206) 624-3211

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.96.0.pdf
Size
123,859 bytes
SHA-256
9ed0a59789ff5c434bb40019de1c636ac6b0d3ef0072c07304fa93617d1d52c0
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wawd.290910.96.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top