Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Daisha Sanders et al. — U.S. District Court, W.D. Mo. PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE as to Daisha Sanders (1).… — USA v. Sanders et al (Dkt.…

Court filing

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE as to Daisha Sanders (1).… — USA v. Sanders et al (Dkt. 276)

Summary

An Order of Forfeiture as to Daisha Sanders in United States of America v. Daisha Sanders, Case No. 24-00029-01-CR-W-BP, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, dated April 23, 2025 as Doc. 276. It recites that on November 21, 2024 the defendant entered a plea agreement under which the defendant admitted the allegations of forfeiture and agreed to a money judgment of at least $40,832.50, to be ultimately determined by the Court at sentencing. The order directs the defendant to forfeit at least $40,832.50 under Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c). It states the order becomes final as to the defendant at sentencing. It is signed by Chief United States District Judge Beth Phillips.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court records for the Western District of Missouri and Western District of Washington
Filed2025-04-23

Cite this document

“PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE as to Daisha Sanders (1).… — USA v. Sanders et al (Dkt. 276).” U.S. District Court records for the Western District of Missouri and Western District of Washington, No. 4:24-cr-00029-BP, Doc. 276, filed 2025-04-23. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-sanders-wdmo-4-24-cr-00029/2025-04-23-gov-uscourts-mowd-174450-276-0-doc-276/, SHA-256 c472ebc9eb022a29f41491a937303a062d53245c18c7ac8cafd5d3322f769adc.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE  
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI  
WESTERN DIVISION 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
DAISHA SANDERS, 
Defendant. 
Case No. 24-00029-01-CR-W-BP 
ORDER OF FORFEITURE 
This matter is before the Court on the Motion of the United States for an Order of 
Forfeiture.  
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2024, the defendant Daisha Sanders entered into a plea 
agreement with the United States pursuant to which she admitted the allegations of forfeiture and 
agreed to a money judgment in the amount of at least $40,832.50, to be ultimately determined by 
the Court at sentencing.   
WHEREAS, the United States has filed a motion for an order of forfeiture which would 
consist of a personal money judgment against the defendant, Daisha Sanders, in the amount of at 
least $40,832.50. The Court will orally announce the final calculated money judgment amount at 
the time of sentencing, and will include the final calculated amount in the Judgment and 
Commitment Order, and  
WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) provides that “no ancillary proceeding is required to the 
extent that the forfeiture consists of a money judgment,” 
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that 
the defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of at least $40,832.50, to be ultimately 
Case 4:24-cr-00029-BP     Document 276     Filed 04/23/25     Page 1 of 2

determined by the Court at sentencing, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 
981(a)(1)(C), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c). 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction 
in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Order; and 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4)(a), this Order of Forfeiture 
shall become final as to the defendant at the time of sentencing and shall be made part of the 
sentence and included in the judgment; and 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p) 
and Rule 32.2(b)(3) the United States may undertake whatever discovery is necessary to identify, 
locate, or dispose of property subject to forfeiture, or substitute assets for such property; an
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States may, at any time, move pursuant to 
Rule 32.2(e) to amend this Order of Forfeiture to substitute property to satisfy the money judgment 
in whole or in part. 
SO ORDERED: 
Dated: April 23, 2025 
/s/ Beth Phillips _______________________ 
BETH
 
PHILLIPS
 
CHIEF
 
UNITED
 
STATES
 
DISTRICT
 
JUDGE
 
Case 4:24-cr-00029-BP     Document 276     Filed 04/23/25     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mowd.174450.276.0.pdf
Size
85,574 bytes
SHA-256
c472ebc9eb022a29f41491a937303a062d53245c18c7ac8cafd5d3322f769adc
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mowd.174450.276.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top