Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Royce Newcomb case — U.S. District Court, E.D. Cal. Detention Order — United States v. Newcomb (Dkt. 11, E.D. Cal.)

Court filing

Detention Order — United States v. Newcomb (Dkt. 11, E.D. Cal.)

Summary

A detention order in United States v. Royce Newcomb, No. 1:22-cr-00287-ADA-BAM, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, filed December 5, 2022 as Document 11 and dated December 2, 2022. After a detention hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the court orders the defendant detained under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i). The form sets out the statement of reasons and findings of fact, based on the evidence and the Pretrial Services report, and commits the defendant to the custody of the Attorney General.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed December 5, 2022 in Royce Newcomb; one of 1 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Filed2022-12-05

Cite this document

“Detention Order — United States v. Newcomb (Dkt. 11, E.D. Cal.).” U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. 1:22-cr-00287, Doc. 11, filed 2022-12-05. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-royce-newcomb-caed-418776/2022-12-05-gov-uscourts-caed-418776-11-0-doc-11/, SHA-256 b50abe4980e2ada8cbb46522044224b87919a101f01c77fe4ff170b77ca3199e.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

UNITED STATES
              Case 1:22-cr-00287-ADA-BAM      DISTRICT
                                          Document      COURT
                                                   11 Filed 12/05/22 Page 1 of 2
                                   EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                    No. 1:22-cr-00287-ADA-BAM

                           Plaintiff,

         v.                                                   DETENTION ORDER

 ROYCE NEWCOMB,

                        Defendant.

A. Order For Detention
   After conducting a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court orders the
   above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i).

B. Statement Of Reasons For The Detention
   The Court orders the defendant’s detention because it finds:
    X    By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
         assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
         By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
         assure the safety of any other person and the community.

C. Findings of Fact
   The Court’s findings are based on the evidence which was presented in Court and that which was contained in the
   Pretrial Services Report, and includes the following:
    X     (1) Nature and Circumstances of the offense charged:
           X     (a) The crime, Wire Fraud, is a serious crime and carries a maximum penalty of
                 (b) The offense is a crime of violence.
                 (c) The offense involves a narcotic drug.
                 (d) The offense involves a large amount of controlled substances.
          (2) The weight of the evidence against the defendant is high.
    X     (3) The history and characteristics of the defendant including:
                 (a) General Factors:
                          The defendant appears to have a mental condition which may affect whether the
                          defendant will appear.
                          The defendant has no known family ties in the area.
                          The defendant has no known steady employment.
                     X    The defendant has no known substantial financial resources.
                          The defendant is not a long time resident of the community.
                          The defendant does not have any known significant community ties.
                          Past conduct of the defendant :
                          The defendant has a history relating to drug abuse.
                          The defendant has a history relating to alcohol abuse.
                     X    The defendant has a significant prior criminal record.
                          The defendant has a prior record of failure to appear at court proceedings.
                     X    The defendant has a history of violating probation and/or parole.




                                                          1

 Defendant: ROYCE NEWCOMB                                                   Page 2 or 2
          Case 1:22-cr-00287-ADA-BAM Document 11 Filed 12/05/22 Page 2 of 2
 Case Number: 1:22-cr-00287-ADA-BAM

            (b) Whether the defendant was on probation, parole, or release by a court;
                          At the time of the current arrest, the defendant was on:
                                 Probation
                           X     Parole
                                 Release pending trial, sentence, appeal or completion of sentence.
               (c) Other Factors:
                                 The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation.
                                 The defendant is a legal alien and will be subject to deportation if convicted.
                                 Other:
         (4) The nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release are as follows:
         (5) Rebuttable Presumptions
               In determining that the defendant should be detained, the court also relied on the following
               rebuttable presumption(s) contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), which the court finds the
               defendant has not rebutted:
                      a.         The crime charged is one described in § 3142(f)(1).
                                 (A) a crime of violence; or
                                 (B) an offense for which the maximum penalty is life imprisonment or death; or
                                 (C) a controlled substance violation that has a maximum penalty of ten years or
                                 more; or
                                 (D) A felony after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior offenses
                                 described in (A) through (C) above, and the defendant has a prior conviction of one of
                                 the crimes mentioned in (A) through (C) above which is less than five years old and
                                 which was committed while the defendant was on pretrial release
                      b. There is probable cause to believe that defendant committed an offense for which a
                          maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed
                                 in the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, et seq.,
                                 the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 951, et seq.,
                                 the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. App. §§ 1901, et seq., or
                                 an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b.
                                 an offense involving a minor under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1),
                                 2245, 2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2),
                                 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.

D.      Additional Directives
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that:

        The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility
separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

        The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; and

        That, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in
charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for
the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

     Dated:    December 2, 2022                                  /s/
                                                       UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE



                                                             2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.caed.418776.11.0.pdf
Size
110,571 bytes
SHA-256
b50abe4980e2ada8cbb46522044224b87919a101f01c77fe4ff170b77ca3199e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.caed.418776.11.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top