Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu:… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 146)

Summary

A Civil Law and Motion Minute Order, Doc. 146, dated 9/30/2021 in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation, Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Judge Donna M. Ryu, recording proceedings by Zoom video conference. The entry records that the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of a Class Action Settlement [Docket No. 137] was held and the motion is taken under submission. By no later than 10/7/2021, the parties are to submit supplemental declarations on the basis for the proposed administrator's estimate of a 1-4% claims rate, on the costs of sending class notice via U.S. Mail, and on Plaid's statement that it has never sold or provided the proposed class members' data to a third party.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
CIVIL LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER 
 
Date:  9/30/2021 
Time: 1:03-1:48 
Judge: DONNA M. RYU 
Case No.: 4:20-cv-03056-DMR 
Case Name:  IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION 
 
For Plaintiffs:  
Rachel Geman 
Shawn Kennedy 
 
For Defendant Plaid Inc.:  
Whitty Somvichian 
 
Deputy Clerk: Ivy Lerma Garcia 
 
Recorded in Zoom: 1:03-1:48 
 
 
PROCEEDINGS HELD BY ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCE 
 
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of a Class Action Settlement [Docket No. 137] – 
hearing held, motion is taken under submission 
 
By no later than 10/7/2021, the parties shall submit the following information to supplement the 
motion:  
 
1) a supplemental declaration(s) setting forth the factual basis for the proposed administrator’s 
estimate that the claims rate will be between 1-4% of the total class size, including addressing 
claims rates in comparable cases;  
2) a supplemental declaration by the proposed administrator that addresses the costs associated with 
sending the class notice via U.S. Mail to every proposed class member for whom Plaid has a 
physical mailing address, including addressing the estimated claims rate for emailed vs. mailed 
notice; and 
3) a supplemental declaration or interrogatory response memorializing Plaid’s statement that it has 
never sold or provided the proposed class members’ data to a third party. 
 
 
 
Order to be prepared by:  
(  ) 
Plaintiff 
 
(  ) 
Defendant 
 
(X) 
Court 
 
cc:  Chambers 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 146     Filed 09/30/21     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.146.0.pdf

Size

78,931 bytes

SHA-256

7d4b37c22098d7b878c7c46795082b2925f6940d9b6883353f6480b10a709ede

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.146.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)