Exhibit 5 — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 108.6)

Summary

Exhibit 5, filed November 17, 2020 as Document 108-6 in Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, the Plaid privacy case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, reproduces California Senate Bill No. 355, introduced by Senator Murray on February 16, 2005. The legislative counsel's digest says the bill would state the Legislature's intent to enact legislation to improve the security of the Internet, and that existing law, the Consumer Protection Against Computer Spyware Act, protects consumers' computers against certain types of software.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

EXHIBIT 5 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 108-6     Filed 11/17/20     Page 1 of 2

SENATE BILL
 No. 355
Introduced by Senator Murray
February 16, 2005
An act relating to the Internet.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 355, as introduced, Murray. Internet security.
Existing law, the Consumer Protection Against Computer Spyware
Act, provides specified protections for the computers of consumers in
this state against certain types of computer software.
This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation
that would improve the security of the Internet.
Vote:   majority. Appropriation:   no. Fiscal committee:   no.
State-mandated local program:   no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1
2
SECTION 1.  It is the intent of the Legislature to enact
legislation that would improve the security of the Internet.
O
 
99
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 108-6     Filed 11/17/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.108.6.pdf

Size

510,537 bytes

SHA-256

f399bbabc58f93c54d6a3884f8e5308ed1dd7c2db16cbae55da45f9f33ce27d3

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.108.6.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com