Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by James Cottle, Frederick……

Court filing

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by James Cottle, Frederick… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 15)

Summary

A Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, Document 15, dated May 6, 2020 in James Cottle and Frederick Schoeneman v. Plaid Inc., a Delaware corporation, Case No. 20-cv-03056-DMR, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The form asks the party, or the attorney for the party, to indicate by checking one of two boxes whether to consent to or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). It names Shawn M. Kennedy as counsel for Plaintiffs and carries a /s/ signature of Shawn M. Kennedy.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-05-06

Cite this document

“CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by James Cottle, Frederick… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 15).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 15, filed 2020-05-06. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-plaid-privacy-cand-359040/2020-05-06-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-15-0-doc-15/, SHA-256 6d1157b9c5557d38a25d845f3e7b0c88f6d6d1976fa2308b9c0c23aef787192c.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
JAMES COTTLE and FREDERICK 
SCHOENEMAN, individually and on behalf of all 
others similarly situated, 
Plaintiff(s) 
v. 
 
PLAID INC., a Delaware corporation 
Defendant(s). 
Case No. 20-cv-03056-DMR  
 
CONSENT OR DECLINATION  
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
JURISDICTION 
 
 
 
 
INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if you are the party) 
or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to consent or decline magistrate judge 
jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection. 
 
☒ Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a 
United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and 
entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 
 
 
OR 
 
☐ Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States 
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case 
be reassigned to a United States district judge. 
 
 
DATE: May 6, 2020 
NAME: Shawn M. Kennedy 
 
COUNSEL FOR  
(OR “PRO SE”):  
Plaintiffs 
 
 
 
/s/ Shawn M. Kennedy 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 15   Filed 05/06/20   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.15.0.pdf
Size
150,815 bytes
SHA-256
6d1157b9c5557d38a25d845f3e7b0c88f6d6d1976fa2308b9c0c23aef787192c
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.15.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top