Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Request for Judicial Notice re 108 Opposition/Response to Motion,, filed byCaroline… —…

Court filing

Request for Judicial Notice re 108 Opposition/Response to Motion,, filed byCaroline… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 110)

Summary

Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation, Master Docket No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division, before Hon. Donna M. Ryu (Doc. 110, dated November 17, 2020). Under Federal Rule of Evidence 201, plaintiffs ask the Court to take judicial notice of materials supporting their opposition to Plaid Inc.'s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 78). Exhibit 1 to the Geman Declaration is the complaint filed October 14, 2020 in Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Plaid Inc., No. 20-14424 (D.N.J.). Exhibits 2 through 7 are legislative materials on California Senate Bill No. 355, codified as the California Anti-Phishing Act of 2005. The signature blocks carry /s/ for Rachel Geman, Shawn Kennedy and Christopher Cormier.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-05-04

Cite this document

“Request for Judicial Notice re 108 Opposition/Response to Motion,, filed byCaroline… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 110).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 110, filed 2020-05-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-plaid-privacy-cand-359040/2020-05-04-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-110-0-doc-110-995/, SHA-256 c35061fae06e4f12fa23908c463d97fb71819e0971f1a745fbe9ca2f21fc4c7c.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
2055405.3  
 
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472) 
skennedy@herrerapurdy.com 
Andrew M. Purdy (SBN 261912) 
apurdy@herrerapurdy.com 
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826) 
bhembd@herrerapurdy.com 
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500 
Newport Beach, CA 92660 
Tel: (949) 936-0900 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332) 
nherrera@herrerapurdy.com 
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891) 
lseidl@herrerapurdy.com 
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600 
Oakland, CA 94612 
Tel: (510) 422-4700 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
Rachel Geman (Pro Hac Vice) 
rgeman@lchb.com 
Rhea Ghosh (Pro Hac Vice) 
rghosh@lchb.com 
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor 
New York, NY 10013-1413 
Tel: (212) 355-9500 
Fax: (212) 355-9592 
Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &  
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857) 
msobol@lchb.com 
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096) 
mgardner@lchb.com 
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 
Tel: (415) 956-1000 
Fax: (415) 956-1008 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
Warren T. Burns (Pro Hac Vice) 
wburns@burnscharest.com 
Russell Herman (Pro Hac Vice) 
rherman@burnscharest.com 
900 Jackson Street, Suite 500 
Dallas, TX 75202 
Tel: (469) 904-4550 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
Christopher J. Cormier (Pro Hac Vice) 
ccormier@burnscharest.com 
4725 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 200 
Washington, DC 20016 
Tel: (202) 577-3977 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY  
LITIGATION 
Master Docket No.: 4:20-cv-03056-DMR
 
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR 
JUDICIAL NOTICE  
 
Hon. Donna M. Ryu 
Action Filed: 
May 4, 2020 
Trial Date:  
None Set 
 
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:  
ALL ACTIONS 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 110   Filed 11/17/20   Page 1 of 4

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
2055405.3  
- 1 - 
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 
 
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, Plaintiffs hereby 
respectfully request that the Court take judicial notice of the following materials in support of Plaintiffs’ 
Opposition to Defendant Plaid, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 78), filed concurrently herewith.   
Exhibit 1 to the Geman Declaration is the Complaint filed October 14, 2020 in the action 
Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Plaid Inc., No. 20-14424 (D.N.J.). “A court may take judicial notice of 
undisputed matters of public record, which may include court records available through PACER.”  U.S. 
v. Raygoza-Garcia, 902 F.3d 994, 1001 (9th Cir. 2018), citing Fed. R. Evid. 201(b).  Courts may take 
judicial notice of court records filed in other actions, “to establish the fact of the litigation,” as well as 
any undisputed facts reflected therein. Petrovich v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 15-00033, 2016 
WL 555959, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2016), aff'd, 716 F. App'x 614 (9th Cir. 2017).  See also, e.g., 
Lodgepole Invs., LLC v. Barsky, No. 15-00549, 2015 WL 1306849, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015) 
(judicially noticing complaint in other litigation); Boisvert v. Li, No. 13-01590, 2014 WL 279915, at *3 
(N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2014) (same). 
Exhibits 2 through 7 to the Geman Declaration are legislative materials concerning California 
Senate Bill No. 355 (2005-2006 Regular Session), codified as the California Anti-Phishing Act of 2005 
(“CAPA”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22948 et seq.  Specifically, these materials include publicly 
available committee reports and versions of Senate Bill 355, all of which are well-recognized subjects of 
judicial notice. See Anderson v. Holder, 673 F.3d 1089, 1094 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012) (“Legislative history is 
properly a subject of judicial notice”).  Alternatively, these materials concern “only legislative facts,” 
which the Court is free to consult, and “for which ‘[j]udicial notice ... is unnecessary.’” Blumenthal 
Distrib., Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc., 811 F. App'x 421, 422 (9th Cir. 2020), quoting Von Saher v. 
Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, 592 F.3d 954, 960 (9th Cir. 2010); citing Owino v. Holder, 
771 F.3d 527, 534 n.4 (9th Cir. 2014); Fed. R. Evid. 201 advisory committee notes. 
Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the Court take judicial notice of, and/or consult, the 
following Exhibits to the accompanying Geman Declaration:  
1. Complaint (Dkt. 1) in Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Plaid Inc., No. 20-14424 (D.N.J., filed October 
14, 2020), attached as Exhibit 1. 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 110   Filed 11/17/20   Page 2 of 4

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
2055405.3  
- 2 - 
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
2. Assembly Committee on Appropriations Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (July 13, 2005), 
attached as Exhibit 2. 
3. Assembly Committee on Judiciary Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (June 28, 2005), 
attached as Exhibit 3. 
4. Senate Rules Committee Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (August 25, 2005), attached as 
Exhibit 4. 
5. Introduction of Senate Bill 355 by Senator Murray (February 16, 2005), attached as Exhibit 5. 
6. Assembly Committee on Business and Professions Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (June 
21, 2005), attached as Exhibit 6. 
7. Senate Judiciary Committee Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (April 5, 2005), attached as 
Exhibit 7. 
 
Dated: November 17, 2020 
 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
 
/s/ Rachel Geman 
 
 
 
Rachel Geman 
 
Rachel Geman (Pro Hac Vice) 
rgeman@lchb.com 
Rhea Ghosh (Pro Hac Vice) 
rghosh@lchb.com 
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor 
New York, NY 10013-1413 
Tel: (212) 355-9500 
Fax: (212) 355-9592 
 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857) 
msobol@lchb.com 
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096) 
mgardner@lchb.com 
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 
Tel: (415) 956-1000 
Fax: (415) 956-1008 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 110   Filed 11/17/20   Page 3 of 4

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
2055405.3  
- 3 - 
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Dated: November 17, 2020 
 
HERRERA PURDY LLP
 
/s/ Shawn Kennedy 
 
 
 
Shawn M. Kennedy  
 
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472) 
skennedy@herrerapurdy.com  
Andrew M. Purdy (SBN 261912) 
apurdy@herrerapurdy.com  
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826) 
bhembd@herrerapurdy.com  
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500 
Newport Beach, CA 92660 
Telephone: (949) 936-0900 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
 
HERRERA PURDY LLP
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332) 
nherrera@herrerapurdy.com 
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891) 
lseidl@herrerapurdy.com 
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600 
Oakland, CA 94612 
Telephone: (510) 422-4700 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
Dated: November 17, 2020 
 
BURNS CHAREST LLP
 
/s/ Christopher Cormier 
 
 
 
Christopher J. Cormier 
 
Christopher J. Cormier (Pro Hac Vice) 
ccormier@burnscharest.com 
4725 Wisconsin Avenue, NW 
Washington, DC 20016 
Tel: (202) 577-3977 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
 
BURNS CHAREST LLP
Warren T. Burns (Pro Hac Vice) 
wburns@burnscharest.com 
Russell Herman (Pro Hac Vice) 
rherman@burnscharest.com 
900 Jackson Street, Suite 500 
Dallas, TX 75202 
Tel: (469) 904-4550 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
 
Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel  
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 110   Filed 11/17/20   Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.110.0.pdf
Size
26,850 bytes
SHA-256
c35061fae06e4f12fa23908c463d97fb71819e0971f1a745fbe9ca2f21fc4c7c
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.110.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top