Court filing

Declaration of Rachel Geman — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 108.1)

Summary

The Declaration of Rachel Geman in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 108-1, in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation, Master Docket No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division. Geman states that she is an attorney at Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, counsel for the Plaintiffs and the proposed Classes, and that she makes the declaration in support of the opposition to Plaid, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 78). Exhibit 1 is the Complaint in Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Plaid Inc., No. 20-14424 (D.N.J.), filed October 14, 2020, and Exhibits 2 through 7 are Assembly and Senate committee Bill Analysis documents and the introduction of Senate Bill 355, all dated 2005. The declaration is executed November 17, 2020 at New York, New York.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2020-05-04

Cite this document

“Declaration of Rachel Geman — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 108.1).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, filed 2020-05-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-plaid-privacy-cand-359040/2020-05-04-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-108-1-doc-108-1/, SHA-256 7633514c6374d7bff454edc4de0c200e76915da13fd00c4ca0788b1b356e74ee.

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
2061035.1  
- 1 - 
GEMAN DECLARATION
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472) 
skennedy@herrerapurdy.com 
Andrew M. Purdy (SBN 261912) 
apurdy@herrerapurdy.com 
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826) 
bhembd@herrerapurdy.com 
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500 
Newport Beach, CA 92660 
Tel: (949) 936-0900 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332) 
nherrera@herrerapurdy.com 
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891) 
lseidl@herrerapurdy.com 
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600 
Oakland, CA 94612 
Tel: (510) 422-4700 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
Rachel Geman (Pro Hac Vice) 
rgeman@lchb.com 
Rhea Ghosh (Pro Hac Vice) 
rghosh@lchb.com 
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor 
New York, NY 10013-1413 
Tel: (212) 355-9500 
Fax: (212) 355-9592 
Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &  
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857) 
msobol@lchb.com 
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096) 
mgardner@lchb.com 
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 
Tel: (415) 956-1000 
Fax: (415) 956-1008 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
Warren T. Burns (Pro Hac Vice) 
wburns@burnscharest.com 
Russell Herman (Pro Hac Vice) 
rherman@burnscharest.com 
900 Jackson Street, Suite 500 
Dallas, TX 75202 
Tel: (469) 904-4550 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
Christopher J. Cormier (Pro Hac Vice) 
ccormier@burnscharest.com 
4725 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 200 
Washington, DC 20016 
Tel: (202) 577-3977 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY  
LITIGATION 
Master Docket No.: 4:20-cv-03056-DMR
 
DECLARATION OF RACHEL GEMAN 
IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' 
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO 
DISMISS 
 
Hon. Donna M. Ryu 
Action Filed: 
May 4, 2020 
Trial Date:  
None Set 
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:  
ALL ACTIONS 
 

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
2061035.1  
- 2 - 
GEMAN DECLARATION
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
I, Rachel Geman, declare and state as follows:  
1. 
I am an attorney at Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, counsel for the Plaintiffs 
and the proposed Classes in the above captioned litigation.  I am a member in good standing of the State 
Bar of New York.  I am older than 21 years of age and am not a party to this action.  I make this 
declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant Plaid, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 78).  
If called upon to testify, I could and would testify competently to the truth of the matters stated herein.   
2. 
Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Complaint in Toronto-
Dominion Bank v. Plaid Inc., No. 20-14424 (D.N.J.), filed October 14, 2020. 
3. 
Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Assembly Committee on 
Appropriations Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (July 13, 2005).  
4. 
Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Assembly Committee on 
Judiciary Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (June 28, 2005).  
5. 
Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of Senate Rules Committee Bill 
Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (August 25, 2005).  
6. 
Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Introduction of Senate Bill 355 
by Senator Murray (February 16, 2005).  
7. 
Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of Assembly Committee on 
Business and Professions Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (June 21, 2005).  
8. 
Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of Senate Judiciary Committee 
Bill Analysis regarding Senate Bill 355 (April 5, 2005).  
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.  Executed this 17th day 
of November, 2020, at New York, New York. 
 
 
 
       /s/ Rachel Geman                 
 
Rachel Geman

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.359040.108.1.pdf
Size: 12,184 bytes
SHA-256: 7633514c6374d7bff454edc4de0c200e76915da13fd00c4ca0788b1b356e74ee
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.359040.108.1.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)